The journal is very efficient. It was under review three days after submission, a major revision was submitted in one and a half months, and one week later a minor revision was required. Then it got accepted on the same day the minor revision was resubmitted.

(0) Thank | 当年万里觅封侯

It was revised for 7 rounds in the system, I couldn’t help but want an acceptance letter, and they gave it to us. Currently we are revising the grammars on round 8 (R8).

(4) Thank | dongchunwang

The review and acceptance are quick, but there will be a long period for format revision afterwards, and it will be officially accepted after the editor is satisfied with the revision.

(8) Thank | 猜猜我是谁呀

I envy you so much. I submitted mine in early November last year, and it is still under external review after revisions.

(0) Thank | 刘LPL

The paper has been submitted for review. We are considering whether to withdraw it, but we are not sure if we will be back to zone 1 next year.

(0) Thank | 狂奔的皮皮虾

Nature has aged, what else is there to say?

(0) Thank | Sci收收收

I just feel that it definitely won't drop, everyone invested in it, and this is the result?

(0) Thank | 我吃小饼干

Is it really raining? I can't believe it.

(0) Thank | 骑鱼过海的猫

Has it dropped to the second tier?? Not even a top journal anymore?? Isn't this a domestic journal? Isn't it edited by academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences? What's going on?

(0) Thank | 狂奔的皮皮虾

The submission process took 4 months, which is relatively long. The editor took 2 months, and the experts have strict requirements.

(0) Thank | 喜刷刷

About a month after submission, the first revision opinions were provided by three reviewers, all of which suggested major revisions. Approximately a week after responding to the first revision opinions, the second revision opinions were received. Two out of three reviewers agreed to accept the submission, while the other two provided minor suggestions. The next day at noon after the second revision opinions were submitted, the acceptance notification was received. This submission process went smoothly, taking about one and a half months from submission to acceptance.

(0) Thank | 无念1994

It has been 10 days without any movement.

(0) Thank | 凝思

Is it very slow recently? It has been 10 days and there has been no movement.

(0) Thank | 狂奔的皮皮虾

When can the original data be uploaded?

(0) Thank | SDUDS

Hello, may I ask if you are 1.13ur, 14, which means two reviewers complete the review in one day?

(0) Thank | hanhangonggong

25.2.2. Xiao Xiuxiu returned,
25.2.3. accepted
Jiang's editing efficiency is super high, and very user-friendly, thumbs up.

(0) Thank | 小吃货

12/24/31 Three reviewers have completed their reviews, and the editor has requested major revisions.
01/25/21 Revisions made
01/25/27 Minor revisions, requested resubmission by 02/10
The editor is very good. The speed is very fast, and possibly because of the Chinese New Year, there will be plenty of time given for revisions. Great praise.

(0) Thank | 小吃货

Hey buddy, is time passing by quickly for you? Or is it dragging on slowly during the Lunar New Year?

(0) Thank | Sci收收收

In less than two months, the article has been accepted! Hope FBIO gets better and better!!

(0) Thank | 土土

Finish
minor revision: 01.16
resubmit: 01.17
accept: 01.20
Thank you very much to the editorial team and reviewers for their selfless dedication.

(0) Thank | 科研界素研

Does anyone have friends who have submitted manuscripts to the special issue on plant polysaccharides? How is the speed of the editing? I just submitted my manuscript today.

(0) Thank | lijfya

Did you also invest in the special issue?

(0) Thank | llbbbl

Is there anyone who has already received it? I would like to ask if there are three review comments in the email, but the journal only provided one review expert opinion attachment. What should I do? Can I copy the questions raised by the expert to Word and answer them myself?

(0) Thank | aaalzll

24.12.19 Submission
24.12.25 Under review
25.01.15 Major revision

(0) Thank | aaalzll

I would like to ask, all three reviewers recommended major revisions. However, the English revised version only includes the comments from the third reviewer and not the other two. How should I reply? I have checked the email attachments and author page but could not find them. I wanted to ask you, the original poster.

(0) Thank | aaalzll