Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | IEEE Wireless Communications Letters | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | IEEE WIREL COMMUN LE | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2162-2337 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2162-2345 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 5.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5962382 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/wcl | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 737 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2162-2337%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on IEEE Wireless Communications Letters: | Write a review |
Author: allan Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-11-27 15:11:01 It is because that the number of articles to be published and submitted is large recently, the processing speed of this journal was a bit slower than the process shared by previous net friend. The main process is as follows: 1) Submission, 2019-06-02; 2) Result of first review: 2019-08-20, it turned out to be rejection (resubmission allowed); 3) Resubmission after revision: 2019-10-03 to 2019-10-04; 4) Accepted directly: 2019-11-26 (during the period, awaiting decision lasted for nearly three weeks. There were three reviewers and all of them were professional, and the questions were very targeted. May you good luck! ![]() ![]() |
Author: jack.hidden Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-04-25 10:31:52 The first review lasted for two and a half months, and the manuscript was rejected and then resubmitted. The rough revisions were completed and I wrote a 24-page reply. The second review took two months and responded requiring minor revisions. One agreed to accept and the other appreciated my meticulous and comprehensive response, and then asked some little questions about sentences and symbols. Accepted after one month of resubmission. It feels a bit slower than others. Maybe the journal receives too many manuscripts in that time. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Roaling Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-04-15 15:32:08 It was submitted at the end of September, and the first review took about one and a half months. It got rejected but allowed to resubmit. We revised it carefully and re-submitted in early January. After a few weeks, a minor revision was required. It was accepted within a day or two after returning the revised manuscript. The speed is very fast and the journal requires a high degree of innovation. Good luck to everyone. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 红鲤鱼 Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-20 18:05:36 This journal is relatively new. The current IF is 2.494, which is relatively high. It belongs to Science Citation Index Expanded. I am not very clear about the relationship between SCI and SCIE. The teacher said that SCI and SCIE are both SCI. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-17 15:32:19 Update: 2025.6.15 Resubmitted 2025.7.3 Awaiting decision 2025.7.9 Accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研打工人! Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-10 18:59:56 Has the OP finished the small repairs yet? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-21 20:39:38 There is a dedicated section for you to upload your response letter, called Author Response, located below the Main Manuscript. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研打工人! Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-19 22:28:04 Hello, should I combine the reply letter and the paper into one file for upload, or upload them separately? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-12 21:48:39 2025.6.12 Minor Revision ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-12 14:35:29 2025. 6.12 Awaiting Decision ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-06 19:41:06 That is a resubmission, and when resubmitting, just indicate the number of the first submission. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研打工人! Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-06 19:35:48 Hello, if the decision letter for rejection and resubmission is titled "Rejected", but the email states that resubmission is allowed. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept多多 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-06 15:32:48 2024.12.22 submission 2025.2.10 reject and resubmit allowed 2025.3.24 resubmission 2025.4.21 reject and resubmit allowed 2025.5.14 resubmission There are two reviewers in total. Reviewer 1 provided friendly comments, and only raised two minor issues in the second round. Reviewer 2 was a bit too harsh, focusing on the simulation section. After adding a lot of simulation content in the first resubmission, the second round of comments asked for more simulation. Due to the five-page limit, I could only add simulation content in the response letter. Hopefully, this time will go smoother. The timeline is too long, two resubmissions should be enough! If it gets rejected in the end, I will really have nothing to say! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研打工人! Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-16 08:44:16 First time submitting a letter, waited for a month and a half for initial review. Received a rejection email with an edited subject line, but the email mentioned that resubmission was allowed. Two reviewers, one provided constructive feedback while the other's feedback was not as good. Is there still hope? Can any experts provide some advice? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 加油GOGOGO Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-27 10:05:06 Hello, OP. How long have you been waiting for Editor Assignment? I have also submitted for a week, and still in Awaiting Editor Assignment... Too slow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Sci aaaaa Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-23 12:38:18 Have you ever encountered a situation where your submission was rejected after a month and a half without receiving any email or feedback from the reviewers? ![]() ![]() |
Author: djx666 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-20 20:28:21 The system will provide the details. ![]() ![]() |
Author: jjj中中中 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-20 15:00:37 Can you please tell me what is going on if it has been 10 days since awaiting reviewer assignment? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Nephalem Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-19 20:16:51 Reject (Resubmission Allowed), will he directly indicate (Resubmission Allowed)? ![]() ![]() |
Author: djx666 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-17 10:45:45 In addition, because there was no option for uploading the blue version in the new system, I didn't know how to upload the blue draft at that time. I searched online before, but couldn't find any similar experiences. Here I share that I submitted the blue version latex file directly in the main file option, without submitting the non-blue version file. ![]() ![]() |
Author: djx666 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-17 10:42:11 Provide a sample Submission on October 1, 24 Under review (editor) on October 6, 24 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment on October 15, 24 Under review (external) on October 26, 24 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment on November 8, 24 Under review (external) on November 15, 24 Awaiting Decision on December 6, 24 Rejected on December 22, 24 (Resubmission Allowed) Resubmitted on January 22, 25 Under review on January 23, 25 Awaiting Decision on March 1, 25 Accepted on March 5, 25 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Sci aaaaa Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-13 12:54:15 How to deal with the slowness compared to others, awaiting Editor assignment also takes many days. ![]() ![]() |
Author: QKQ1028 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-27 07:25:49 Just add a note, there are no options in the system, just add a note to the final PDF version. ![]() ![]() |
Author: accept-congrat Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-26 16:35:22 May I ask if the letter allows co-authorship? ![]() ![]() |
Author: QKQ1028 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-13 09:54:35 Submission on August 14 Waiting for decision on September 8 Rejected on September 12 but allowed to resubmit Resubmitted on October 21 Accepted on December 12 The second review took a bit longer, almost two months, but luckily it was accepted directly. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last (To Page |