submit: June 13, 2020; under review: June 17, 2020; reviewers revision: Aug 28, 2020, minor revise (2 reviewers); 1st minor revised: Sep 22, 2020; under review: Sep 22, 2020; Oct 5, 2020; Required reviews completed: Oct 26, 2020; 2nd reviewers revision: Nov 01, 2020, minor revise (4 reviewers); 2nd minor revised: Nov 04, 2020; Accept: Nov 06, 2020; Online: Nov 12, 2020. Best wishes for everyone!

(102) Thank | 无极六九

It was submitted in mid-to-late September, and sent for review on October 5. Then it was under review, and this status lasted for 40 days. It has been two months now. I hope there will be a reply at the end of the month.

(0) Thank | 一旺百旺

This journal has now become the most authoritative journal in the redox field, and it has high requirements for innovation. Several articles have been submitted to this journal and rejected after 2 days, which were later published in an IF 5 journal. The accepted one here was previously rejected by PNAS after sending for review. We made appropriate revisions based on the reviewers’ comments and submitted it to Redox Biol.

(14) Thank | 南国

This journal is on a hot topic. ROS is a highly discussed area of research today (or in the past 20 years). The impact factor of this journal is therefore very high. However, I think this is because the journal is open access; the quality of the papers is not that high. The IF will probably be steady at 7. According to the ranking by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, not good enough to be ranked Q1.

(0) Thank | 北溟鱼

The resubmission was accepted, and it took a month for revisions. The reviewers took a couple of months to review it, and then it was accepted. It was still reviewed by the original reviewer.

(0) Thank | 求求了只想上个岸

12/24/17 transferred to Redox Biology
12/24/18 sent for external review, accepted by 2 reviewers
12/31/18 received first review
02/18/19 major revisions
03/14/19 resubmitted after extensive revisions
03/27/19 accepted after second review
This was my first time submitting to this journal, and both the editor and reviewers were very friendly. Although I had to add nearly half of the content, it did lead to a substantial improvement in the article. Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | 長安

How many reviewers are needed in total?

(0) Thank | lulu

How is the situation with the boss? I submitted on February 17th, and all reviewers finished on February 26th, but I still haven't heard anything. I'm very anxious.

(0) Thank | paper dream

The reviewer is overdue for the review, so we can only wait for the additional review.

(0) Thank | 長安

May I ask if the second reviewer has replied? I have been waiting for 20 days. Generally, journals require comments to be submitted within 10 days. I wonder what happened ?.

(0) Thank | 豆豆cy

Have you got any results? I have also encountered another reviewer who has not responded yet. The journal typically requires completion within 10 days, but it's been almost 20 days now. I'm worried that the reviewer might have disappeared.

(0) Thank | 豆豆cy

12/24/17 transferred to Redox Biology
12/24/18 sent for external review, with 2 reviewers accepting the review
12/31/18 one review has been received
Updates will follow, hoping for a positive outcome.

(0) Thank | 長安

Topic: Neurodegenerative Diseases
On December 22, 2024, the manuscript was transferred from Elsevier to Redox Biology.
On December 23, 2024, 7 review invitations were sent out, and 1 review was accepted.
Further updates will follow.

(0) Thank | Rottadam

Just invested yesterday, recording the status.

(0) Thank | Zyzpkilly

Boss, how is the situation now? Do we need to upload WB three times? Do we need to revise the whole paper? Did the new reviewers raise a lot of new questions?

(0) Thank | 求求了只想上个岸

Do WB results need to be repeated three times? Do they need to be quantified? Looking forward to your answer!

(0) Thank | 00lin99

Do you need 3 repetitions for the WB result? Do you need the entire membrane? Looking forward to your response!

(0) Thank | 00lin99

Do WB results need to be repeated three times? Do they need to be analyzed as a whole film? Looking forward to your answer!

(0) Thank | 00lin99

Excuse me, do you need to upload three repeated WB results?

(0) Thank | Tess Sawyer

Excuse me, is it necessary to upload the WB that is repeated 3 times?

(0) Thank | Tess Sawyer

No, we are conducting makeup experiments.

(0) Thank | 求求了只想上个岸

On September 19th submitted, on September 20th under review, updated three times on September 25th, October 3rd, and October 9th. Are we unable to find reviewers?

(0) Thank | 重阳绿柏

Have you re-invested? How is the situation?

(0) Thank | 派大星在修行

Boss, I would like to ask, I am currently also revising and resubmitting rejected manuscripts. Did you resubmit your manuscript to the original editor and reviewers? If not, did you resubmit to new individuals who then raised many new issues, leading to another round of revisions before resubmission?

(1) Thank | 求求了只想上个岸

The external audit experience lasted nearly two months, and the comments finally came back on September 30, 2024. There were two reviewers, and their comments were all right. There were not many experiments that needed to be supplemented. I wonder if there is any expert who can help me with this confusion: What should I do if, after completing the supplementary experiments and resubmitting, a new set of issues are raised by the new editor and reviewers, leading to rejection and resubmission again? Isn't it a waste of time to keep doing this? After all, graduation is approaching.

(0) Thank | 求求了只想上个岸