This journal belongs to the top journal in the field of construction machinery. The article was submitted in January 2020, the comments on major revision were returned in mid-March. It took more than one month before the submission of the revised article in mid-April. The comments on minor revision were returned at the end of May, and it was accepted in June. The comments raised by the reviewers were every professional, especially the details of the article were very strict.

(59) Thank | 惊蛰

Submitted on January 27, 2019, reviewers invited for 40 days, then it was sent for review for 20 days. The results of the first review returned in about two months, requiring major revisions within two months. I spent forty days revising and resubmitted. It was sent for external review again for 26 days. The results were received then, requiring minor revisions. After revised submission and sending for review for another ten days, it was accepted on July 5th, and online on July 17th. The requirements for innovation are relatively high, and the reviewers are quite strict.

(5) Thank | lhkitty

The review speed is OK – not fast or long. From my experience as well as my colleagues, the total review cycle is between 9 and 12 months. The main research focus is civil engineering; however, the journal also publishes articles on programming content, such as automation, and articles that are related to improving the efficiency of algorithms.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Please update the latest situation.
Received feedback from the editor at the end of July and returned on the same day.
Accepted at the beginning of August, celebrating the completion.

(0) Thank | Wbbbb

Good news, that reviewer at least recommended major revisions.

(0) Thank | karna

Jul 31 1-1-21 Under Review

(0) Thank | Linkinw

It took two months to prepare before the first reviewer returned on July 29, 2025.

(0) Thank | Linkinw

July 23, 2025 0-1-17. Are all the reviewers on vacation? Why is nobody responding?

(0) Thank | Linkinw

2025-7-19 拒绝
根据编辑要求修改后再次提交
2025-7-19 编辑审核中

(0) Thank | littlebee

July 18, 2025 With Editor

(0) Thank | littlebee

July 16, 2025 UR

(0) Thank | karna

Share my timeline, please.

Submitted in February 2025, no one accepted the review for 1-2 weeks, will be expedited.
Major revision in early April 2025.
Returned for revisions in early May 2025.
Minor revisions in early June 2025.
Returned in mid-June 2025, currently under review. Status shows that the reviewer has completed their review, but the editor has not processed it. It has been one month since it was returned.

(1) Thank | Wbbbb

July 07, 2025 0-1-13

(0) Thank | Linkinw

It's a bit slow. Or is it WE?

(0) Thank | karna

7.6 hired, a total of over eight months before and after.

(0) Thank | 8888

Two rounds of reviewers have been added, but still no one has accepted the review. Could it be that the content written does not meet the scope of the reviewers or the journal?

(0) Thank | Linkinw

Thank you for your answer.

(2) Thank | 陈木东100

The deputy editor has reviewed it and submitted it to the editor-in-chief. You will receive feedback from the editor-in-chief in two days.

(2) Thank | 8888

I am also dip after with editor, do you know what's going on, any updates?

(0) Thank | 陈木东100

Today only the chief editor made revisions for rework.

(0) Thank | 8888

It's the same for all, the average review period on the official website is six months.

(0) Thank | 科研小蚂蚁~

Why hasn't this journal had any reviewers assigned for over a month?

(1) Thank | Linkinw

After the minor revisions, "dip" was changed back to "with editor". What does this mean?

(0) Thank | 8888

May I ask who your handling editor is?

(0) Thank | wujiemc

6.30, waited for 32 days, finally dipped.

(0) Thank | 8888