Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

Sustainability

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[Sustainability]Hello, you are Visitor Number 84582 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSustainability
Journal Title AbbreviationsSUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
ISSN2071-1050
h-index53
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.010.5491.169
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Q153 / 288
Category: Social Sciences
Subcategory: Geography, Planning and Development
Q155 / 629
Category: Energy
Subcategory: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Q159 / 153

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)38.90%
Official Websitehttp://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://susy.mdpi.com/
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume4814
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Social Science Citation Index
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2071-1050%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher: 17.72 Day(s)
Data from Authors: 17.72 Day(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Sustainability】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Sustainability: Write a review
Author: 小Paper


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-25 21:28:13
2018.09.24 submitted; 2018.10.01 Received major revision comments, a total of 2 reviewers, 1 major revision, 1 acceptance; 2018.10.12 resubmitted after revision; 2018.10.15 2 reviewers’ comments received; 2018.10.22 accepted; 2018.10.24 Published online. The advice given by the reviewers was very pertinent and helpful. The journal gave 10 days for revision, but I was afraid it would not be enough so I requested another 10 days. Took 7 days to revise the paper and then polished the language. On the 12th, we submitted the revised manuscript in the evening. Reviewers returned their comments on the 15th, then the status became pending editor decision. I was anxious, checking every day, and finally received the editor's acceptance mail on the morning of the 22nd. Then it was the proof step, but you can sign a payment statement first so the paper can be published online. Now you have to send the payment directly to the Swiss account. On the 24th, the paper was published online. Sustainability has high standards for novelty. The assistant editors are all very nice and responsible, whether rejection or sending to peer review is all fast, highly efficient. If the paper is sent out to peer review, and you can carefully revise according to the reviewers’ comments, there is a good chance that the paper will be accepted. I hope the journal is getting better and better. I am very grateful to this journal because now I have met our institute’s requirements for graduation. I also appreciate that this platform makes it possible to find a lot of journal information so conveniently. I hope my second paper will be accepted with much trouble.

(92) Thank | 小Paper

Author: 省略号君


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 16:09:52
Can also be very fast Open source 1400 chf
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 省略号君

Author: ByPass


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-28 10:54:01
Super fast, see a journal in 20 days.But when I checked the web of sciences today, I didn't find the article in 2019. Was it removed by SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ByPass

Author: 小茶人


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-23 19:21:19
18nian November 2nd, 3rd, 3rd reviewers return comments, 23Rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小茶人

Author: Guojin


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-02 09:53:00
The speed is extremely fast, and the reviewer returns a quicker opinion.I selectd for one, minor repair, and direct accept.Also included in the SSCI.However, submission is still difficult, many people are rejected by the second, so in order to facilitate peer exchange, a qq group has been established: Welcome to the penguin group discussion: 658902184
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Guojin

Author: wangleixi


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-30 21:01:29
Our theme is catastrophe risk pricing... um... yes, the theme isNot suitable, so it was rejected in half a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | wangleixi

Author: Bigstar


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-25 14:05:27
12-1 Under review12-17 Pending Decision12-24 Reject4 reviewers, refused, good-hearted
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Bigstar

Author: dwqjz


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 10:34:09
Submitted on August 12th, after the select was made on August 12th, the next day, August 13th, edited and wrote a letter asking for the WORD version of the manuscript, because the submission was not suitable, soI feel that editors and external review experts are very serious.On August 15th, I received the revised opinions of two external auditors. One of them basically had no opinions. The other mentioned a lot of very pertinent amendments. I asked for 10 days to renovate. I think it takes 30 days to modify the time. The result is not edited.After agreeing to be so long, I gave 25 days to modify the time. In the end, I used 20 days to modify it. I received a small revision opinion soon. The external review experts were satisfied with the revised comments and raised several minor questions, such as adding English documents.And they are all documents provided by external auditors.Received a notice of acceptance on September 12 and published online on September 18.About 10,000 yuan.The overall feeling is that the external review experts and editors are very serious and the opinions are very pertinent.There is no recommended reviewer, so I feel that the quality of the article is king!
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | dwqjz

Author: 齐德隆东墙


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 09:34:36
It can be said that it is fast, and the reviewer returns a quicker opinion.I selectd for two articles and recorded one.Not bad.In order to facilitate peer exchange, a QQ group has been established: Welcome to the penguin group discussion: 785268896
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 齐德隆东墙

Author: 一水一木


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-19 21:23:57
Our school does not need to pay any fees for MDPI articles, but there are very few people around, which is a waste of resources.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 一水一木

Author: 蚂蚁学步


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-01 17:22:32
2018.07.12 Submission;2018.07.31 Received overhaul comments, a total of four reviewers, 2 overhauls, 1 minor repair, 1 reception;2018.8.15 Return the manuscript after modification;2018.08.18 Received minor repair comments, 1 minor repair, 3 receptions;2018.8.31 Recruitment.The overall feeling is relatively smooth, the reviewers' opinions are very professional, the quality of the papers is obviously improved, and the editors are very responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 蚂蚁学步

Author: paper


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-24 08:43:15
Found that the wos search is very slow now, and still stay in the fifth issue, you must know that September is now,
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | paper

Author: dreamdoit8888@aliyun.com


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-22 18:51:47
The review speed is very fast, and the second day of submission is the status of under review.Three comments after one month, two overhauls and one minor repair.After a round of going back, it was another overhaul.After the second round of repairs, it was a minor repair and was finally acceptd!The reviewers are very good, and many of them have already played a significant role in improving the level of the article.Special mention is to edit nice!Received: 29 May 2018; Accepted: 18 August 2018!
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | dreamdoit8888@aliyun.com

Author: luckyman


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-21 14:25:47
In 2017, I submitted two articles to Sustainability with the same door, and the results were rejected within one day.I sent an article this year, and I feel good about myself because the first draft has been selectd for top journals. Although it has not been accepted, the review comments all consider the article "has potential". For the structural modification of the article, adding a lot of data and supplementing the site research, the Sustainability finallyRecruited.Three reviewers, two overhauls, and one minor repair; the review comments are very professional and are experts in the industry.After the overhaul, the reviewer suggested that Xiao Xiu publish, but the academic editor carefully read and suggested the overhaul article.After finally submitting the manuscript in two months, the article went through two major repairs. After a minor repair, it was acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | luckyman

Author: zhibin1@ouc.edu.cn


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 16:52:43
Everyone feelsHow is the recent speed, is it very slow?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhibin1@ouc.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 11:39:46
reviewers are very professional and high level.I am very happy with the recruitment of this article. It is a representative and an international authority.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1066638523


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 17:18:59
The review speed is fast, but the innovation is very demanding, and there must be a good idea.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1066638523

Author: yezi_king@163.com


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-02 16:09:39
is still very difficult to think. The Chinese editors are quick to review and respond to the contents of our journals in two days.Not suitable enough, refused to draft.Transferred to other journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yezi_king@163.com

Author: yc004009@gmail.com


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-24 00:53:42
Received Date 1 June 2018Revised Date 19 June 2018Accepted Date 23 June 2018The speed is very fast, the reviewer and editor-in-chief are very nice.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yc004009@gmail.com

Author: outsider


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-22 13:41:21
Submitted on May 15th, received on June 13th.The speed is very fast, and the three reviewers have positive opinions.Received after a major overhaul.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | outsider

Author: 本杰明


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-07 11:31:25
The speed is a bit scary:2018.5.25 Submission2018.6.2 Review comments, minor repairs2018.6.4 Second draft handed in2018.6.7 AcquiredAt first I was worried that the junk publication was cheated.Understand a bit, the journal is not bad, SSCI, the impact factor is not low.Although the layout fee is very expensive, it does not mean that there is a problem with the journal.It is not possible to pay money.It is necessary to have high quality articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 本杰明

Author: Wisdomdou


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-05 19:58:08
Manuscript InformationReceived Date25 January 2018Revised Date29 March 2018Accepted Date5 April 2018Fast speed, rework advice is more professional, the layout fee is about 10,000 yuan
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Wisdomdou

Author: 鑫鑫


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-20 10:58:38
modify the recruitment process is more tortuous, two2017 12.23-1.17 pending decision-pending major revision A reviewer agreed to publish, and the other two gave a lot of revisions to give 10 days of overhaul time.
         1.26-2.1 Resubmit after modification, and received the revised major revision. The two reviewers agreed to publish this time. The third insisted that the first proposal was not directly resolved.10 days to modify the time and solve the problem one by one.
          2.9 Returning to resubmit At the same time, it is ready to be rejected. Perhaps the reviewer receives the modification in time, and the feedback evaluation is validly resolved. It is recommended to publish, and this will receive the paper accepted. The fee is 9256 yuan.There are specific guidelines.
        There are only two major opportunities for major reforms. The key is to make the structure logically reasonable, to make clear the details, and to fully resolve the opinions of the reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 鑫鑫

Author: King


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-18 22:42:16
This journal is a journal of MDPI. The review of MDPI journals is very fast, about a month.I submitted the manuscript at the end of November 2017. I received a minor notice in early January 2018 (about one and a half months, probably because I experienced various festivals during the period). I returned to the revised draft two days later (requested to return within 5 days) and received the notification every other day..Open source journals, the fees are very high (about 10,000 CNY).In 2017, the self-citation rate is too high and it is really dangerous.However, the journal is very formal and the editors are not bad. I wish you better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | King

Author: spring


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-18 20:55:17
is really fast.Give comments in 3 weeks in the first instance, and give more opinions in 2 weeks in the second instance.The reviewers’ comments are also very professional, and one of them is very strict.Although it is a legendary water journal, it is not easy. It needs to be taken seriously. The manuscript profession can hopefully be acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | spring

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Sustainability]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*