My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 87224 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL ENVIRON MICROB
ISSN0099-2240
E-ISSN1098-5336
h-index293
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.181.6631.272
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Immunology and Microbiology
Subcategory: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Q114 / 98
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
Q122 / 273
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Ecology
Q132 / 336
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q142 / 257

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)5.10%
Official Websitehttp://aem.asm.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://aem.msubmit.net/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY, 1752 N ST NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036-2904
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1976
Annual Article Volume612
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0099-2240%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 60%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY: Write a review
Author: GHG


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-10 16:33:09
AEM has been published for more than 100 years and has been selected as one of the 100 most influential journals in the world. This journal is recognized in the microbiology field at home and abroad, and most of the authors that get published in this journal are well-known European and American scientists.  The review speed is super-fast, but the reviewers can be tough. I submitted in March 2016 and received comments in 18 days – about 5 pages of comments from three reviewers. The three reviewer’s opinions were very positive, but it was recommended that I re-do my entire experiment. The editor gave the re-review opportunity, although I refused to accept the comments from the reviewers about my manuscript. Overall, I was very impressed regardless of the final result. The reviewer's opinions were very constructive.

(3) Thank | GHG

Author: Zirui


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-19 13:50:42
1 select SBB, 2 shots EM are rejected by the second, 3 submitted AEM, entered the review, and began to hope, but the process is extremely rough: the first reviewer's comments are pertinent, 1The reviewer's approval is nothing, but the editor encourages re-submitment; overhaul for two and a half months, the response and the argument together are nearly 30 pages; after the re-submitment, two reviewers are re-introduced, plus the previous reviewerBefore the reviewer re-reviewed, he said that the first reviewer of the new reviewer said that the response was good, and that the reception was received. Another new reviewer said that the article was not innovative and rejected.But the editor gave the change this time, and wrote nearly 15 pages of response, which was finally received.The following is a review process, I hope to be useful to everyone.2018.9.17 Submission2018.9.18 Under review2018.10.28 Rejected but the editor encourages re-submitment2019.1.17 Submission2019.1.17 Under review2019.1.30 Accept2019.2.13 ProofI am very grateful to Prof. Hideaki Nojiri for editing the journals. The articles are innovative and linguistically demanding, and I hope that I will be able to do so later.
Show Review in Original Language
(31) Thank | Zirui

Author: 123


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-01 12:28:23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology is a good journal. The research team has submited in several articles, but frankly speaking, there is still a big gap compared with Environmental Microbiology.
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 123

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 19:00:23
The reviewer's request is very strict, overhauled three times, minor repairs twice, and then directly acceptd.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: sound


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 21:04:49
4.27 Submission4.27 under review6.15 Give the review comments, send the two reviewers, come back one, very positive, raised a few questions, the editor also raised several questions;6.30 repair7.2 under review7.9 acceptTo sum up, this is the first AEM. The article has strong innovation, and a model is proposed. The reviewer asked me to verify it with other data, so I verified it when I repaired it and received it directly.The reviewer is very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sound

Author: leshuai2004


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 15:33:39
A journal that was soon and very fast, submitted during the day, and saw the under review the next day.In the first instance, two reviewers are quite positive, but they still need to make up some small experiments, and other journals are minor repairs.The result is that the editor rejects the draft, but encourages the revision and then submitteds.This is a magical place for AEM, and it is rejected for trials.Therefore, the published articles are reviewed very quickly.After half a month, I will select again and under review will accept it in 15 days.Received 24 May 2018 Accepted 11 June 2018Accepted manuscript posted online 18 June 2018Innovation is paramount, and it is ok to delve into a little bit of research.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | leshuai2004

Author: micro


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-26 21:40:45
The number of articles in the professional field is well-received. The number of articles has dropped from more than 1,000 to several hundred per year. How can the impact factor continue to go up?It’s almost time to announce the latest impact factor, and see if you can get 4 points this year.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | micro

Author: 食品安全


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-10 21:18:27
Very professional journal, according to the reviewer's comments, the overall level of the article has been greatly improved, more rigorous.The first time I selectd for a month, a minor repair, a major repair, a major overhaul or rejection, the editorial attitude is very good to recommend a re-submitment.The supplementary data was revised for two months, and the re-submitment went back to reviewing the manuscript for another month, minor repair, and returned to receive it one day later.The editing process is very fast, and the review is professional. If there is a suitable article, it will continue to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 食品安全

Author: gherkinbb


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-06 21:15:03
17.11.27 contribution18.01.08 Rework, the opinions of the three reviewers are relatively pertinent, but some places still need minor repairs.18.01.29 repaired back18.01.30Receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | gherkinbb

Author: 332627872@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 10:41:46
connectedFeeling: Before submitting a manuscript, think about whether your article's innovation and workload have reached the requirements of this journal, and then submit it and review the manuscript's request even if it is rejected.The reviewer is not always correct, and it is reasonable to see if his request is reasonable and whether he can meet the requirements within his ability.I was rejected because of the lack of a model validation, the model itself is very large, so I think the workload is sufficient, and I have not verified.As a result, the reviewer hit me with a single point of data to verify that this is helpful to help the reader apply my model.I originally planned this, and it took me more than a month to add data.I don't have the data to do it, but the data of the published article.After doing a good job and then returning, returning to two supportive one month later is not optimistic.I am not optimistic about the meaning of not fully understanding me, so I argued a bit.Then I will submit a revised draft after 1 week and receive it on the third day.Therefore, we must persist in observing the situation and carefully analyzing and thinking.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 332627872@qq.com

Author: 332627872@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 10:41:28
total: good journal, super responsible editor, super responsible reviewer, each submissionIt is not more than one month to give advice.After the refusal, it is recommended to re-attend, re-attack after overhaul, and receive it in 32 days.The total time from the first submission to the reception is 152 days.timeline:Manuscript accepted 2018-02-01Under Review 2018-01-31Reviewing Editor Assigned 2018-01-31Initial QC 2018-01-30Manuscript Submission Incomplete 2018-01-30 Submit a modified version2018.01.22 Give revisions2017.12.12 Under review2017.12.10 Submit an articleOverhauled for two monthsManuscript Rejected 2017-10-11Under Review 2017-09-01
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 332627872@qq.com

Author: Leona


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 11:13:15
It is said that EM is better than AEM. I think comparing these two journals depends on the direction.Pure environmental microbes, EM may be better, but in general, AEM is good.In the field of partial molecular biology, EM reviewers do not have AEM reviewers.My article selectd for EM according to the opinion of our boss, and refused for 17 days. I feel that the review comments submitted by EM are not very professional. Some basic concepts of the profession are obviously not very understandable.Of course, the main reason for rejecting the manuscript is that the logic I wrote at the beginning of my article is relatively difficult to understand. This is the first time I wrote a essay. Although I did this, I have not written it before.Our laboratory is an environmental microbe and does not do molecular biology.Therefore, the idea of ​​the article from design, to experiment, to writing articles are all my own.Due to lack of experience, the overall logic of my writing may be difficult to understand, because the signal transduction of molecular biology is a bit of a circumstance. Although it costs money to polish the language, it is directly rejected.To be honest, EM's review comments have nothing to learn from, but I know that my article is not well written, I will try hard to change, they put forward some opinions clearly indicating that they did not understand, and then I almost rewritten it once.Due to the large amount of work, I deleted some of the results that they did not understand why they were placed in the article.Then directly submitted AEM.After 20 days, I received a review opinion from AEM. One of them said that the article language is good, the results are reasonable, and the work is very good and comprehensive.However, because the other two reviewers made up the experiment, the editor gave the rejection and suggested a re-submitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Leona

Author: Leona


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 11:11:03
Overall, the editing of AEM is very efficient and very responsible.AEM reviewers are very professional.After resubmission, in addition to the previous three reviewers, and again to find a new reviewer, AEM is really very strict, which shows that the quality of the above articles is very high.Since my experiment is basically getting started from the beginning to the end, this time I can get an AEM, I think I can be very proud to say that I have initially established a foothold in my field.Attached below is my submission time:2017-01-27 One submission2017-02-17 rejection2017-03-26 re-submitment2017-05-03 received review comments2017-05-06 minor repairs go back2017-05-09 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Leona

Author: Leona


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 11:10:41
(Continued from the previous one) I carefully studied the reviewers' opinions. I found that most of the experiments that make up the supplements are my EM, reviewers.I don't understand why I did this experiment, so I deleted it.So, I put those experiments back, and then added two more experiments. These two experiments were not thought of by me. The reviewers were really special. I felt that the articles were particularly complete.After returning to the game again, this was reviewed for 37 days. At that time, my heart was cold. I think that it is not good for reviewers to feel that time is so long.I really can't stand it, I wrote to the editor and asked about the situation.The editor said that he has received the review comments.It takes a day to sort out.Later, I received the review comments. The two original reviewers all expressed that they were particularly satisfied. The new reviewers only mentioned six minor questions, all of which were to modify some small languages. This shows that my experiments have been compared.It's perfect.In fact, AEM's editors are particularly efficient. They basically go out at night and have already dealt with it the next morning. The reason why this review was 37 days is that I submitted the manuscript because he sent the original three reviewers.A new reviewer was sent.As a result, the new reviewer replied, but only three of the original reviewers responded.The editor is waiting for the original third reviewer, but because I have drafted it, AEM has three review opinions in theory, and the three reviewers have good opinions, so the editor will not wait any longer.I sent it back.I changed a few minor questions according to the new reviewer, and I received the receipt letter three days after I returned.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Leona

Author: Leona


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 11:10:02
Overall, the editing of AEM is very efficient and very responsible.AEM reviewers are very professional.After resubmission, in addition to the previous three reviewers, and again to find a new reviewer, AEM is really very strict, which shows that the quality of the above articles is very high.Since my experiment is basically getting started from the beginning to the end, this time I can get an AEM, I think I can be very proud to say that I have initially established a foothold in my field.Attached below is my submission time:2017-01-27 One submission2017-02-17 rejection2017-03-26 re-submitment2017-05-03 received review comments2017-05-06 minor repairs go back2017-05-09 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Leona

Author: maidou


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-04 19:06:46
转: AEM was founded in 1912 and is one of the leading journals of ASM.AEM is committed to publishing important results on all aspects of applied microbiology research. In the 2014 Chinese Academy of Sciences Document Information Center Division, AEM was the 2nd Division.In the ESI database of Thomson Reuters in 2015, AEM ranked 5th in the Biology Biochemistry category. In 2014, the total number of citations was 91,772, ranking first in both disciplines.AEM, along with Nature, Science, and PNAS, was named by the US Special Libraries Association as one of the "100 Most Influential Magazines of the Past 100 Years."
 Admirable microbiology journal
 (1) AEM is committed to publishing important achievements in the field of microbiology and is strict in terms of innovation.There is no prejudice against the contributors. It is not because the author is a grassroots refusal to reject the manuscript, nor will it be released because it is a big cow.
 (2) Dedicated editorial team.Edit the best microbiologists from all over the world.Communicate with the author during the review, proofreading, and publishing process and make professional revisions to the article.Improve article readability and professionalism.
 (3) Influence.As a TOP journal for microbiology, AEM has published a research paper on the comprehensive quality evaluation, professional title evaluation, and application of the National Excellent Youth/Jieqing Fund.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | maidou

Author: Saccharomyces cerevisiaee


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-10 09:17:37
Directly acceptd one month, no review comments?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Saccharomyces cerevisiaee

Author: shucheng1991@126.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-14 12:29:35
Published on May 25, 2016, under review on May 26, rejected on July 5, and gave comments to three reviewers.The journal is very responsible, the reviewers are very professional, and the opinions are very pertinent and detailed.The review speed is still very fast, but the content of the article is hard.The next time you have the right article, you will first consider this
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | shucheng1991@126.com

Author: dasa


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-28 15:27:56
Although the journal is very bullish in the field of environmental and applied microbiology, why the Chinese Academy of Sciences has always identified him as a 3 district journal?
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | dasa

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 08:59:00
environmental microbiology, 2012.12.17 contribution, 2013 1.31 overhaul, 2013.3.7 repairedAccepted the same day, the speed is very fast.Two reviewers
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-09 17:44:00
What is the journal fee for this journal?Thank you
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-11 16:20:00
The journal's influence is very high in the field of microbiology, and the article emphasizes applicability.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-27 18:41:00
For more than two months, the three reviewers agreed that the article was not very applicable and the cup was used.However, I have put forward a lot of useful opinions and suggestions. After the revision, the journals that have been selectd for have gone smoothly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-26 08:29:00
Submission within 3 weeks, lack of innovation requirements or quite high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-13 12:53:00
old-fashioned journals in the field of microbiology.If you are a microbial application, the first consideration is the journal.Of course, there are better journals, Nature biotechnology and PNAS, but this is a high level and it is generally difficult to meet the requirements.From the perspective of impact factors, the same level of bias applications such as metabolic engineering, bioengineering and biotechnology, etc., but the impact is still slightly lower, we still recognize this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy