X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

POWDER TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[POWDER TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 128805 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePOWDER TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsPOWDER TECHNOL
ISSN0032-5910
E-ISSN1873-328X
h-index119
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.701.0791.773
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q130 / 279

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)18.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/504094/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/POWTEC
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume941
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0032-5910%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 11 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 32%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【POWDER TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on POWDER TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 15:10:00
Asia Pacific editing for Yu Ai Bing, I don't know how efficient
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-29 15:49:00
6 Submitted at the beginning of the month, with editor14 days, 1 month review cycle, required reviews completed statusIt lasted for 14 days, and the final opinion was directly acceptd, which may be better luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-29 15:00:00
2 Submitted in the month, communication, a reviewer, after the review, after one month, the editor gave the opinion, minor repair, returned after ten days, one week review ended, and againAfter a month, the editor gave advice and accepted.In short, the journal is too slow, from submission to acceptance, after more than five months, the impact factor should not rise.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-29 09:14:00
Flight Combustion of the Agglomerate Powders Containing Energy (APCE) in Making New Hollow Multiphase Ceramic Microspheres by Self-reactive Quenching TechnologyReference:PTEC9687Journal title:Powder TechnologyReceived at Editorial Offic
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-06 09:23:00
seems that my luck is still relatively good, even for a month of minor repairs, almost three and a half months to get, Li academician is very good, praise one, the reviewer did not mention any big problems, thank you very much.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-08 17:36:00
has been modified 5 times in 1 year and finally acceptd!The first major overhaul, followed by minor repairs, but minor repairs are also more than 10 opinions.The journal is still very responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 16:54:00
The first trial was quite fast for more than a month. The review comments only allowed the English to be modified. After the translation company was revised, it was submitted. After half a month, there was no news. It was really depressed!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-15 08:14:00
Nov 30, 2012 Initial date submittedDem 16, 2012 Under ReviewJan 31, 2013 Major Revision(R1)Feb 30, 2013 Initial date submitted(R1)Mar 07, 2013 Under ReviewApr 11, 2013 Required ReviewsCompletedApr 13, 2013 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-22 18:29:00
From submission to now, with editor for more than a monthI haven't submitted it yet, 哎
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-11 09:29:00
Under Review has been 2 months..., still waiting
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-02 11:41:00
CupThe reason is that the number of manuscripts is too much, and it is directly rejected... No. 11.24 submission, No. 12.1 rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-28 18:42:00
Received at Editorial Office: 8-AUG-2012UnderReview: 10-AUG-2012Major Revision: 24-SEP-2012Article revised: 14-NOV-2012Accept for publication: 21-NOV-2012
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-01 10:02:00
first praise one!The review speed is still very fast!I solved it in a month, not as everyone said, I chose Professor Li.Being revised, I hope to be acceptd earlier.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-28 11:26:00
The draft submitted in mid-September, the next day is under review, but it is still in this state, do you want to draft?I also chose Professor Li, can't find a suitable reviewer.I have been under review, I can't see the details, I don't know what's going on.Added: The time for the under review suddenly changed on November 13th, before September 17, and now changed to November 13.Didn’t you find a reviewer before, but now I’m starting to review?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-26 00:15:00
Published on July 23, 2012, and under review on the 25th, but it has been in this state for 3 months, and it was urging once in 2 months. No reply, anxious, rushingI will graduate in May next year!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-10 17:46:00
just submitted, expecting good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 15:35:00
My article has been used for 14 months from submission to acceptance!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-17 15:16:00
Selected Professor Li to be an editor, very powerful!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-03 14:14:00
Submitted to accept for 2.5 months.It feels not very difficult. After all, it is a half-monthly journal. The amount of water is relatively large. As long as the data system has an opportunity, the innovation requirements are not very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-09 15:30:00
Feeling is still relatively fast. On May 14th, the technical review failed, and after May 17th, it was re-submited. On June 27th, the review comments came back, minor repair, changeAfter that, the revised version will be uploaded on July 9th, and I hope to receive it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-01 08:54:00
Mar 1, 2012 Initial date submittedMar 16, 2012 Under ReviewMay 12, 2012 Major Revision(R1)Jun 02, 2012 Initial date submitted(R1)Jun 07, 2012 Under ReviewJun 25, 2012 Required ReviewsCompletedJul 07, 2012 Accept. Written
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-24 19:28:00
Feeling is still slow system information is under review for a long time. Even the date is not suitable for worms who are eager to send articles. I don’t know if this year’s IF can pass.2 Previously, this article submitted a journal editor just over 1 to make the overhaul too troublesome. I chose to refuse to modify it. This is to gamble on its IF. 2 No way to define a high-level journal is IF>2 to publish several SCIs.Journals below 2 are not as important as a 2+. Upstairs comments have said that the reviewer quickly feels that it is only an individual phenomenon. Look at the articles published in the journal. The majority of the processing period is 3 months or more.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-01 15:46:00
has selectd for this journal after a few turns. Before the select, I saw that the comments of the small woodworm did not depend on it. The review period was too long, but the person in charge of me had to say that this was not the case.Weekly review comments, accepted one week after the revision.Very efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-20 08:54:00
came back from the time of the select to the revised opinion for almost 2 months, then after overhaul, minor repair and reception, a total of 3 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-07 20:14:00
Submission to acceptA total of 8 months, the middle is very anxious, but did not dare to remind, after waiting for a period of time after overhaul!Anyway, it is good news and very satisfied!I hope that everyone can have good news!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [POWDER TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service