Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444251 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-22 22:21:00
Reviewing is faster, the article has been accepted, but has been modified many times!Feeling reviewers and editors are very responsible.Publishing editors are very demanding!!!!For our direction, the impact factor is very high, very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-05 08:00:00
is not SCI, see the official website authority http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/ just checked the results
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-27 16:04:00
looks like PLOS ONE in 2012SCI was removed from the year!!!!!!Http://www.sci-thomsonreuters.org/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-17 21:45:00
It is recommended not to select for this journal in the future. The irrigation in one year is too big. We may not calculate this journal when we are in the assessment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-04 08:41:00
The recruitment rate is less than 100%, and it is impossible to be so high. The review of plos one is still very strict.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-21 16:24:00
It would be much better if you don’t charge!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-21 12:27:00
My boss is also very contemptuous of this journal, he said that many big names now look down on this journal.The article is very watery.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-19 17:25:00
A good journal, the review speed is fast, but a bit expensive: the publication fee is US$1350.The research on biomaterials and cell behavior, the methods and drugs I use are relatively new.After submitting the manuscript at the end of March 2012, I returned to the revised opinion after 3 weeks. Both reviewers said that my results were very interesting, the writing level and logic were good, but they all said that there was no mechanism understanding, and the editor gave me a major overhaul.With reference to the review comments, I carefully carried out supplementary experimental verification and consulted the literature for mechanism analysis.The revised manuscript was sent back to retrial, and one month later today (June 18), the article was received directly.Feeling to answer the reviewer's review comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-30 15:37:00
A paper on the purification, properties and application of fungal proteins, the workload is very substantial, the results are small and innovative, and the language has been modified on foreign websites.BT was rejected, AEM was rejected, and the reason was somewhat far-fetched.The boss is keen on the reputation of the factors and journals and insists on going to high submitment.After plos one, he was trained to receive it, less than two months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-26 07:03:00
3Submission No.19, on April 25th, the two review comments were returned, and the results of the review were all good. The editor's opinion was “minor revision”, which is under minor repair. Overall, theThe review speed of the journal is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-11 13:55:00
issued an article at the beginning of the year. The process of summarizing plos one is: October 20, 2011, 21, Editor Invited, 25, under review,November 23, Required Reviews Completed, 25th overhaul decision, submitted revised version on December 15th, accepted on January 2nd, 2012, reviewer recommended 3, but may only be used for one, editor recommended 1However, I didn't use him. I used to have two IF6 or so. I selectd because I was preparing a doctoral thesis, so I wrote a shorter one. When I discussed it with my boss, I thought it might be possible to select for IF>5, but the boss thinks PLoSOne is also a good journal,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-26 13:06:00
PLos one's review speed is still very fast, the first trial is almost one and a half months, two reviewers, one medium repair, one minor repair, no need to supplement the experiment.People are recommending themselves and feel at least one reviewerIt was recommended by us. After half a month of revision, I went back and received it in two weeks. After one month, I saw it very quickly. The paper was purely bioinformatics. Without experimentation, BMC Plant Bilogy was directly rejected.I selectd for PLOS ONE. I feel that this journal prefers bioinformatics papers. The level of reviewers is still very high, and the impact factor will remain at this level. The journal is good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-23 09:14:00
Tiantou, today sent me the article number, and I look forward to having a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-21 15:39:00
1 Month submitted, overhaul, is being revised.....good and bad, too tortured.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-21 09:18:00
Excuse me, what is the probability of accepting plos one after overhaul? Recently, my article has been reviewed for one month, the editor has made a major overhaul, and the reviewer asked Xiao Xiu, but the problem is more
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-09 21:24:00
PLoS The biggest advantage of ONE is that it does not require significantity and only cares about science. Therefore, it is more cost-effective for some non-hotspot research. After all, there are more than 4 points of journals. I doPure base of archaea-associated proteinResearch, and pure in vitro research, there have been two papers about 5 points in the journal due to the significant problem of the cup directly, after the PLoS ONE is small repair reception.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-01 10:31:00
todayCasting, praying
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-25 00:53:00
This journal is now quite a bit. The article that was previously drafted by a 3-point journal is easy to accept. Now it is directly drafted by the same article.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-20 20:49:00
The article is now very large, with hundreds of articles per day.It is very likely that IF has experienced a sharp decline.The speed of reviewing this journal is uncertain, and some editors will deal with it very quickly. With the reviewer reviewing the time, I will reply as soon as possible.But sometimes I will have not responded for three months.So I want to hurry up and suggest everyone:
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-03 00:27:00
Overhaul, there are results in 2 and a half months after the select.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-31 11:20:00
After the impact factor is out, it is obviously stricter, the level is higher than before, but it is slower!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-13 18:42:00
Submitted on November 3rd, accepted on January 7th, happy!Pay today!1350 knife!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-06 22:26:00
1 Received the letter received on the 6th of the month.Let's talk about the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-06 10:12:00
submission. I received it directly without modification. It was unexpected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-05 19:18:00
Review is very fast The judges are very professional and highly efficient. Submitting to accept less than 2.5 months is a bit of a charge.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.