Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444250 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 15:20:00
Is it SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 16:29:00
PLOS ONE What papers are received?I see an article with a differential evolution algorithm and no biological problems, can I?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-27 16:42:00
The article on ecology, I heard that the submission will be easier, but a related professional article that has been recognized is rejected after reviewing the manuscript.In the 12th year of November, the manuscript was overhauled in January, and it was given 45 days. After the detailed revision of the year, I sent it abroad to find a co-author to help with the language. After returning to school in the Chinese New Year, I will submitted the official revision, halfway because of a technical reason.Returned to repair once, then the editor directly reviewed the manuscript (not externally reviewed), and gave a minor repair in two weeks.It took only one day for the minor repair, but it was given for 45 days, so I waited a few days for the submission, and accepted it after more than a week...It is quite smooth...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-26 09:59:00
2012-12-13Submission, 28th day, 1-5 days with editor, 1-7under review, 2-2 repaired overhaul, gave 45 days, modified 3-14 submissions, 3-17with editor, until today is still in this state, I do not know what the situation, the first trial 3with editor 3 days after the under review, I look forward to a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-09 16:38:00
submitted an article a year ago, before the ethical review was very strict, the plants had to write clearly, and then the language problem, due to the Chinese New Year delay, selectd back on February 23, has been EditorInvited, March 9, with editor, after ten minutes, became under review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-06 09:06:00
Editor Invited It’s been almost a month, so I’m still not moving.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 21:38:00
Ask everyone a question, I selectd for an item on the 1.28, and now I accepted it, but the boss asked me to modify the fund funding project. I haven’t found a place to change it for a long time.Where do you write the funding when you submitted the manuscript?Thank you very much for your help.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-21 09:03:00
has been submitted for two months, and has been under review, this is how it happened.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-20 22:11:00
This journal many people say that irrigation is serious, butAfter my daughter-in-law was rejected, I saw that the editors were also very responsible. On the contrary, some people in China were not responsible for speaking. When people published articles, you said that people were flooded. I am afraid that there are problems with motivation. As far as I am concerned, I am here.The transposon article sent above is quite horizontal. After all, PLOS ONE is a comprehensive journal. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some journals of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of interest to others.The quality of the article is also ok. I don't believe that you can't send the journal at the level of 2 points. If you can help everyone graduate, don't say so much cool.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-15 09:41:00
12/02/2013 Manuscript Submitted14/02/2013 Editor Invited19/02/2013 With Editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-02 12:27:00
1 Submitted on the 29th, 4 days passed, even the manuscriptThe registration number has not been obtained yet, and the efficiency is too low now?Two years ago, I selectd for an article. The editor was very serious and responsible. After repeated two times, I passed the technical review and got the registration number.The reviewers' comments were also in place, and the manuscripts were revised twice, and the quality of the manuscripts improved a lot.As a result, the manuscript was cited by peers after being published for 3 months, and the influence of the journal is evident.However, it is not optimistic that the impact factor for 2012 will be reduced to around 3.8 due to the surge in publications.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-13 00:32:00
selectd for a month or editor invited This is because the editor did not update the system information in time. In fact, it has been submitted for review. This is the editor who told me
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-28 23:20:00
The review process is very seriousThe reviewer's question is very good and professional. After the first revision, he answered the professional question. The reviewer asked to continue to modify the English expression. I carefully submitted it and submitted it. The reviewer and the editor thought it was not appropriate. I asked for a foreigner.The foreigner helped to polish English and submitted the third time for employment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-17 14:14:00
Let me talk about my submission progress and feelings: I submitted a draft in August, I need to read the instructions for submitting the manuscript in advance, and I have a request for the picture. Of course, the picture has problems and it is ok. After receiving it.It is also possible to change it again.When submitting a manuscript, you need to fill in a lot of content, such as animal experiments, or moral proofs.If it fails, the review editor will ask for a refill.Each time you refill the content, it will be delayed by about 1 week.So be sure to fill in as much as possible.After the review, the manuscript will be sent to the editor and begin the three-month external review. At the end of November, the results of the external review are minor repairs. The three reviewers made some suggestions from different angles. The smoothness of the language is the most important.The problem needs to be treated carefully.The editor will notify you within 45 days
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 20:59:00
No matter how many papers are sent by PLOS ONE, the first thing that can be affirmed is that it is absolutely not like some rubbish papers in some domestic conferences, reviewers and editors.The quality of the paper is still strictly controlled.As for some people who think that there is more irrigation, some people think that the quality of the article is very high, and it is understandable. After all, the level of each person is different.Another point is that we can guarantee that we don't go to SCI journal to water it!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 20:37:00
Up to now, 21626 articles have a layout fee of 21626*$1280=$27681280, which is equivalent to RMB 200 million. I don’t know how much I contributed to Greater China....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-03 21:59:00
The only thing that surprised me is that the annual volume of the journal has approached 20,000!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-21 20:34:00
No.8 submitted on the 8th, and later found that the picture was not qualified, rebuilt, officially submitted on the 12th, thanks to the reminder of the previous bug, the ethical review is very important, so after the submission, the editor will be successful.But my with editor process is also very long, has been in mid-October, looked at it, or with editor, but did not remind, just think about it, the result arrived on October 30, directly received mail, minor revision, 2 reviewers, 4 suggestions per person, a total of 8 articles, 4 of which are about the symbols in the picture, the numbers in the table, and the ABC used to explain the picture should be consistent with the article (the article usesAbc), the other 3 are about normal in introductio
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-24 13:35:00
, now the speed of this journal is not as fast as before, I have also been to the letter, saying that it is for a faster review, in the choice of trialIt will take some time for the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-23 23:11:00
selectd for a month or is the editor invited?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-12 20:30:00
Reviewer must be on the top, specifically to find the mailbox!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-07 22:31:00
The first article, submitted on April 26, 2012, "minior revision" on June 3, three experts put forward a lot of opinions, but they are more pertinent.Since I was not in a hurry to write an article, I just went to Jiadong to play in the summer vacation. I submitted the revised version 3 days before the deadline requested by the journal. I didn’t expect to receive the “accept” email on the third day. The article was accepted smoothly. At the end of August.Has been published.The second article was submitted on July 6th, and on August 18th, “major revision”, or three experts, put forward a lot of opinions, especially the experts in statistics, and made 15 comments. Submitted on September 20th.After receiving the second revision opinion "minior revision" on October 3rd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-27 14:17:00
, the submission was rejected for one month, and my article was not biologically motivated.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-24 10:16:00
After three days of submiting, I immediately became an under review. I waited for the result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 23:02:00
has been submitted for 2 months, 1 month passed.Technical review, 1 month has been the editor invited... depressed, today is finally with the editor.....September 28th: ​​Finally, it is UNDER REVIEW, and wait for news.....December 3rd: The three reviewers are all minor repairs. The editor's opinion is Xiao Xiu. The editor will remind you: In the case of Xiao Xiu, it is recommended to repair it within 4-5 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.