Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444249 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: sicence1


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-01 23:16:50
It’s Christmas, this journal is more than everReply a little slower
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | sicence1

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-29 00:40:00
good journals I publishedThe reviewer of a disease-ecological model article is very professional and the comments made by the manuscript are very serious, which greatly improves the quality of the article
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-28 16:26:00
If you publish two plos one, u will never finda job^^ There are a lot of articles that don't go down...
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-19 09:53:00
I didn't think I joined the PLOS ONE team...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 18:05:00
Doing this in bioinformatics is not as fast as the journal in the computer field!!!The reviewer is more professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-07 15:15:00
10 The 20-month draft, the current state of Editor Invited, has been for more than half a month.Newcomers to English submissions, do not know what this state means?Can anyone tell me what state changes will follow?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-29 14:11:00
Editor Invited has been in the state for more than half a month~攒攒人品, hurry up~~~ Even drop a god~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-29 11:01:00
I selectd with the colleague, the article we feel more water, want to try luck, the results returned a month or so, an editor, two reviewers, a full three pages, all the questions are very professional and demanding, there areThe problem is directly fatal, and the article was directly changed to other journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-27 16:03:00
is very unpleasant.All along, everyone else is plos one. The speed is super fast. I resolutely gave up other TOP journals and chose to submit plos one, just to make it faster.As a result, the submission was given 5 days later, the editor was invited for 18 days, and then with the editor is still 9 days!This rhythm is also called fast!!?I haven’t sent an external trial until now, is this speed??If the external trial has been dragged on for a long time, it can be understood. It is only this month that I have not sent out the external trial. I really cannot understand it..I am really disappointed with this journal.Before the select, there were teachers and classmates who advised me not to select for this...I really regret it now.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-08 12:53:00
The calendar is close to four months
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-19 19:04:00
The review speed is very fast, the reviewer is more serious and compares NICE
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 16:35:00
4On the 16th of the month, I selectd out, about half a month later, under review, it was almost 4 months, and there was no news. I was really anxious. Anyone who selectd for me was fierce or Jiduo
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-12 14:26:00
I just dropped an article yesterday and joined the ranks of plos one. I am looking forward to good luck~~~~8.29 Supplement: 8.11 day submission, 15th to manuscript number, 19th with editor, until now this stateFor the delay, I will not give me a review~~~急啊~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-10 17:15:00
Garbage data collection station, the rejected journals have no place to select, the acceptance rate of this standard is 75%, official website introduction
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 马桂伶


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 19:12:57
Review faster, higher receiving rate
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 马桂伶

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-17 18:34:00
Help you heroes: Plos one seems to be very strict with the ethical review, I wrote in the method that the survey protocol was approved by...And ...After conducting the study. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects at the time of the first examination. The editor still returned the manuscript and asked to explain the following questions: Please amend your current ethics state
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 20:30:00
7月11Submission, August 28th major revision; October 12th, resubmit; October 15th, with editor; October 24th, under review; November 13th, minor revision; look forward to good luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: cell


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 14:26:19
this year's influenceThe factor has dropped, but it is still worthy of attention. After all, the number of published articles is very large.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | cell

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-29 22:55:00
was cheated by the foreigner so much money, but also very happy
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-29 18:18:00
rotten journal, kicked out SCI early.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-23 21:41:00
IF3.7, fell out of 4
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-19 14:05:00
first trial for more than two months, overhaul, reviewer gave advice very professional and very detailed,Rehabilitated in 45 days and received two weeks later.Happy!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-15 08:36:00
The first trial was more than 50 days. After the overhaul, the second trial was more than 20 days. After the minor repair, it was received more than 20 days.Still relatively strict, four reviewers.The editors basically don’t give their opinions, and all the reviewers have the final say.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 14:51:00
charges, but the review is also very serious.The materials and methods are required to be written in great detail and the amount of data is large.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-08 11:49:00
Submission Requires overhaul
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.