Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444247 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: rabbitzxy@163.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 06:24:32
2019, submitted on April 3, the revision of the draft in early May, repaired soon after the revision, and received the acceptance notice on May 17.In general, it is still very smooth. The key is to indicate the recommended reviewers to facilitate the positioning of the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | rabbitzxy@163.com

Author: Riven


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:29
Waiting is really a torment, the first trial is not easy to end, I did not expect to come to a second trial, but also in the foreseeable, it has been almost a month.......
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Riven

Author: Riven


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:23
Waiting is really a torment, it is not easy to get a trial.At the end, I didn't expect to have a second trial. It was still in the foreseeable future. It has been almost a month.......
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Riven

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 16:43:28
also encountered journal editors inaction, reminded and reminded.Admit that his level is limited, the paper can only be degraded to this journal, but the process is extremely testable, patient experience, experienced a year, six reminders, each reminder.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: tmdztr


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-30 11:46:57
俺 is almost 4 months old, and today the academic editor told you that 10 invitations for review were declined, no one tried.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | tmdztr

Author: pffwfp@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-13 08:13:34
I submitted PLOS ONE on October 30, 17th, and the status update was under review on January 2, 2018. In the middle two months, I said that I was conducting academic quality review and looking for editors, then went to 2018.On April 13th, it is still under review. I sent an e-mail on April 4th to ask what the situation said. The editor said that the academic editor was unavailable, and said that once an academic editor is available, the review comments will be sent back.Give it to me, because without academic editors, because of confidentiality issues, you can't directly return to the reviewed opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | pffwfp@163.com

Author: aaaa


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-10 09:15:02
submitted for more than one month to enter the external audit, the external audit has been three months, and the e-mail editor has not yet found the external auditor, in a pseudo-external state.Then I received an apology letter from the academic editor, hoping to have a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aaaa

Author: y


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 16:11:00
heard that it is one of the four major water issues.The monthly publications are over 1000, which is a bit exaggerated.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | y

Author: 972639419@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:54:02
is too pitted. After one month, I went into the under review. After two months, I was notified that the academic editor could not use it. I have to find an academic editor again!I haven't sent it out for so long.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 972639419@qq.com

Author: 4117


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:40:46
is normal.It’s only 50 days later, Under Review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 4117

Author: LA


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-10 22:45:08
would like to ask, submitted for 4 weeks, or editor invited, normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | LA

Author: pls8151


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:46:53
俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general journals, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption submitigations.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | pls8151

Author: pls8151


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:45:58
俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general journals, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption submitigations.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | pls8151

Author: Hank


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-23 03:17:39
Submission is simple and smooth, minor repair is on
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Hank

Author: yuanyue284@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 18:53:57
7 submitted at the end of the month, revised in mid-September, revised for one and a half months, accepted in early December.Still very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yuanyue284@163.com

Author: 1234


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 16:29:13
The whole process is more than 6 months, overhauled once, minor repairs, and happy to receive.The original 9-point nucleic acid study was originally planned. People said that the methodology was too special and could not be examined.Later, he selectd for plos computer, and people said that the expert library experts did not have plos one more. They had to select for this. There are suitable experts, and the reviewers are very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 1234

Author: 41056009@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 13:57:21
I also talk about this journal.Submitted on February 2nd.I got a major repair in late June.The first trial was nearly five months.The two reviewers can say that the responsible person has to do not want to, 60 questions, big and small.Response to Reviewers wrote 20 pages, and the manuscript has been basically changed beyond recognition.After overhauling for three months, it became a minor repair, and there were ten problems in minor repairs.The reviewers basically agreed to make serious changes, and the articles were greatly improved.The editor gave the minor repair and indicated that the revision could not be read by the reviewer.Finally relieved.Received half a month after minor repairs.It lasted for 9 months.Let me talk about this publication. I don't say how good it is or how bad it is.It is true that this publication is not very demanding on innovation, so everyone said that he is a good mix of water journals. It is mainly to make clear the whole idea of ​​scientific research.But I just want to say that the reviewers of this journal are indeed very bullish, and it is really difficult to meet the insiders and want to mix them.I met the two reviewers. I just asked the papers all the best, and I didn't have the possibility to get away with it. I made a lot of suggestions.In addition, for each analysis process of the data, the detailed operation of the data behind each graph must take a screenshot of each process, even if it is a software operation, not just the problem of the original data.I feel that after they reviewed the manuscript, my article sent a score of about 2 points and no problem.Thanks to the reviewers, thank you for their hard work.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 41056009@qq.com

Author: 朗格里格拉


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 02:01:03
This journal is rubbish, water journal.Whoever submitteds is not to cherish his academic reputation, in order to send papers to send papers
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 朗格里格拉

Author: 查尔莫斯


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-03 09:45:26
I don't know why, my review period is a little over a five-month notice overhaul, compare and break
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 查尔莫斯

Author: 11


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-02 23:52:42
is faster and easier.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 11

Author: 934001560@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-24 16:36:48
is faster and the editor is very responsible.Too much water?Personally feel that it is more rigorous
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 934001560@qq.com

Author: 管理小菜


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-27 16:16:26
This journal has become more and more strict.The paper was co-operated with the external director. The result was two major overhauls and one minor repair.The first submission to return to the overhaul is 2 and a half months. It is one and a half months to return to the revision and return to the overhaul. The third time to return to the minor repair is 1 month. Finally, the return is modified to receive one month. After receiving and editing, it is edited.Two format changes were sent.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 管理小菜

Author: 计生科


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-22 14:08:46
PLoS one can't change the 7-year continuous decline.Now the impact factor has fallen below 3 points, but once it breaks 3 points, it is a watershed and will fall sharply in the future.Because of the 3 points or less, the quality of the manuscript will be seriously degraded. There will be a lot of retraction.And some units have clearly banned PLOS ONE in terms of job title, project review, and rewards.Sci Rep dropped from 5.2 to 4.2, and this trend is basically 3 points or more next year.This is the next PLOS ONE.
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | 计生科

Author: hunanyan@aliyun.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-25 10:29:11
would like to ask, submitted for 2 weeks, or editor invited, normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hunanyan@aliyun.com

Author: sszs@sina.cn


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-21 12:05:22
This is not easy now, the impact factor is relatively high, the proportion of Chinese is only 24%.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | sszs@sina.cn

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.