Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444246 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: 柯若


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 15:55:46
This journal is quickly growing into a popular choice from scientists in many fields. Warning: the reviewers can be very tough re: the quality of the English writing; if you are an international researcher you better make use of an editing service or you may very quickly receive a desk rejection. The reviewers are very strict and thorough.

(2) Thank | 柯若

Author: hugo


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 21:52:41
People’s Google academic influence is very high. The editors of science all look at his articles. Don’t understand, don’t talk about it, the volume of publication is not the cause of water, and the trouble is submitigated.#
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hugo

Author: 匿名123


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 17:49:47
The review speed is slow, no reviewers can be found, and two reminders are sent.The three reviewers made a lot of very practical changes, not as watery as others said.Received after half a year.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 匿名123

Author: 垂涎木渎


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 12:57:45
There is also an article about Daniel on the above. You have to know that Da Niu has been generally flowering in authoritative journals. Occasionally throwing a piece of rubbish on it does not explain the problem.And you, the mainstream journals can't send, can only spend money on this to buy, to explain your cow?Do you feel the same?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 垂涎木渎

Author: 月色朦胧


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 12:52:17
After identification, the basics of foreign scholars sent to the above are passed.The study, because they want to send which; the Chinese author sent it to this, because there is no place to send it, so it was sent to this, if I graduated and continue to engage in academics, I will not succumb to the boss’s kinky hair.This, although he is willing to give me this money...Listening to many people said that it is an academic stain to publish articles on this or a communication.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 月色朦胧

Author: uiywqruiwe


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 22:23:15
There is no reference value for this journal impact factor. Unexpected publications, water journals, and money journals are undoubtedly impossible to speculate..Do you think that a large biological journal 2.7 is very high?Not to mention the so-called research that is not a biological one. It is foolish and foolish...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | uiywqruiwe

Author: uiywqruiwe


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:11:40
It doesn't blow black, where academic speculators look, the first Chinese authors of Plos one are typical representatives...The problem is coming. It must be a lot of people to spray. If you have the ability, you can submit in a professional journal. Anyone can think of the data...Ok, I am one of them..
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | uiywqruiwe

Author: 屏风秋色


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 15:59:29
Notorious, a thousand miles.Those who want to engage in academics, the papers on this are all self-destructive, sad..I regret it..What is the three districts and four districts, Plos one is a big stinking ditch..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 屏风秋色

Author: linna


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-09 12:15:07
Editors and reviewers are very serious, I have changed 9 times, and the review comments gave seven pages, who said the water
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | linna

Author: perfect77


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-18 14:51:56
Is this a water journal???Is there an experienced god to teach?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | perfect77

Author: 卢伟


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 19:02:21
This is not easy now, the impact factor is relatively high, and the proportion of Chinese is only 24%.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 卢伟

Author: prof


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-13 17:22:28
Although it was in the middle, I felt that it was a journal that was considered to be a lot of water in the country.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | prof

Author: dinga aoteman


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-12 20:57:24
Just write it, it’s boring.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | dinga aoteman

Author: 不服评价指标


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-10 17:59:25
These days, Google’s H-index data was released, and plos one’s influence ranked 23rd or more, even surpassing the super-premium journal Nature Chemistry, which is more than the sci impact factor indicator.Shocked...The large amount of documents can also affect Google's new generation of index system?
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 不服评价指标

Author: 494212953@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-12 14:10:55
Four months after receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 494212953@qq.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 18:40:20
The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly acceptd after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: zhjyq129


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 09:19:22
decision in progress After 40 days of recruitment
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhjyq129

Author: zhjyq


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 09:54:59
minor review After becoming decision in progress 1 month, what is the situation, is not to be rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhjyq

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-14 03:04:46
The famous Big Mac water journal, more than 20,000 articles a year, is a general journal 50-80 yearsArticle volume
Show Review in Original Language
(61) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Hu


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 14:28:37
This journal is not bad. I selectd for two articles, one was rejected, one was overhauled, and many opinions were revised. It is very professional and I have improved my document.At the same time, the publication was not long before the paper was cited many times by other journals, which made me feel that the influence of this journal is still good. At least I personally feel more exposed than traditional non-open source journals...I feel more able to show my research results to my colleagues at home and abroad...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Hu

Author: tmd1880


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 01:52:08
A manuscript of 俺 was rejected by arXiv and asked to be published in the physical review:Dear xxxxxxxx,Our moderators are not willing to reconsider this decision unless this article is first published. They suggested first publishing in Phys Rev A, and after that has occurred, you could resubmit for reconsideration.-----arXiv moderationCan you select for Plos One?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tmd1880

Author: wxling07@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-30 06:56:33
This journal does not want the legendary water, it is indeed very fast.Submitted on January 20th, February 21st, minor revision, returned to revision on April 8th, April 29th, accepted.The review comments were very strict and academically strong, giving a full three-page opinion.Every little detail in the paper, editors and reviewers are not overlooked, very strict.But it is not the legendary failure to pay attention to the original innovation, the scientific significance and innovative requirements of the paper is still quite high!Refueling Plos one
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wxling07@163.com

Author: 1111


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-29 15:50:38
Waited for 5 months, and the school actually did not count the journals. There is no way to retract the papers. When you submit the papers, you must look at the school’s requirements. Is there any?Pull down the school blacklist.The water journal is well mixed, but the school does not necessarily recognize
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | 1111

Author: zhjyq


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 08:26:00
Seeing that there are a lot of retraction notices, what is the situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhjyq

Author: paper123


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-18 08:47:07
period modification and modification, it took a year to finally accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | paper123

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.