My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanoscale

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanoscale]Hello, you are Visitor Number 303248 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanoscale
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOSCALE
ISSN2040-3364
h-index176
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.172.3961.338
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q137 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/nr
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nr
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaCHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume2439
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2040-3364%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 81%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanoscale】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on Nanoscale: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-05 21:43:00
1 submission on the 4th, February 11th received the conclusion, one refused, one big change, the editorial conclusion refused.After reading the review comments, I felt that some of the review comments were biased. I wrote to the editor, and I was waiting for the news.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-05 11:29:00
1 Submitted on the 9th of the month, returning comments on January 29th, a minor repair, a direct acceptance, after the revision, the revised draft will be submitted on February 2nd, and the editorial reply will be accepted on the 4th.Very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-04 08:01:00
is getting harder and harder now, and the manuscript that feels good is actually not given.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-31 12:39:00
1月21日投稿,到Now 10 days, or under review status, I don’t know if I have submitted it for review. Please give suggestions to the journalists who have published this issue, will the Spring Festival affect?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-24 19:56:00
Today, just a cup, tears, and comfort.Submitted on November 22 last year, and returned to review on December 17th. Two reviewers, one suggested receiving after minor repairs, and the other raised two questions..One of the problems is better solved, we made up the experiment, but another question, let us do the in vivo experiment of the mouse, this we can't do, and the genetic drug we made is directed at people.On December 25th, I re-submited and received comments today. The previous reviewer still insisted on the internal experiment and gave the overhaul. The editor directly refused the manuscript. Hey, sometimes it depends on luck, and he encountered a slightly better review.The chances of receiving a human article are greatly increased.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-13 15:03:00
just acceptd an article. After submitting the manuscript, it will be overhauled one month later. The data will be uploaded after one month, and it will be received in less than twenty days (intermediate Christmas New Year). I feel that this journal is quite efficient.of.Regarding the impact factor, using the data of web of science, the impact factor of 5.81 in 2011, the official final release is 5.914, and the calculation in 2012 is 5.72. It is estimated that the final official announcement will be around 5.8, due to the 2011 issue.The number of articles is almost double that of 2010, and the impact factor has not dropped much. This shows that the journal is still able to control the article.In 2012, the journal was changed from a monthly journal to a half-monthly journal. The number of articles included in the year was almost double that of 2011. The 2012 article was
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-10 09:21:00
Thank you for your recent submission to Nanoscale.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-18 14:15:00
Soon, the editor is quite responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-29 19:43:00
Article just selectd, prayed in
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-24 17:47:00
The article was submitted in the past month and there was a result, a reviewer, gave a major repair.Seriously wrote the response letter, made up the data, and gave it a major repair two weeks later.Continue to change, this time just got the comments for half a month, the editor began to remind me to reply, only to rush to fill a data back.Fortunately, reviewer had no comments, and he gave a minor repair two weeks later.After replying for more than a month, during various periods of anxiety, I thought that I had found a new reviewer. Finally, I was very happy and acceptd.I hope my experience will help the insects!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-21 09:05:00
has a manuscript, which was rejected by JMC and JPCC directly. After rethinking and overhauling, he selectd NanoScale. It has been two days, waiting for the result.I hope there is a strong result.....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-16 23:02:00
I personally recommend not to choose luwei that guy is very abnormal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-08 20:36:00
This journal is reviewed very quickly, from submission to acceptance for 25 days, after 17 days of submission, editLet the overhaul, return to the draft after 5 days, and accept it directly in 2 days!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-01 23:07:00
just returned to an overhaul, is being revised, and soon, 22 days to come back to overhaul.Half a month to fix it, and accept it directly after 20 days.I returned to proof again in half a month.I am also not sure what the taste of this journal is. My book was directly given by a journal without him, and I switched to it here, although the overhaul cost a lot of effort.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-28 17:18:00
Reviewing is very fast, personally feel that it is innovative, almost able to..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-14 18:58:00
nanoscale Although the impact factor is high, it is still only SCIE is not SCI. My boss told me today that SCIE is not good, I am dizzy.When will the journal be included in the SCI? I don't know if SCIE will have a sense of God.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-07 08:36:00
My select was rejected by JMC after I was rejected. The 11th day of the submission was rejected. The reason isOnly materials are synthesized without applied research, and the feeling is very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-07 01:49:00
Returned 45 days later, a Major Revision, twice Minor revision, finally received ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-25 04:59:00
after the submission was rejected on the ninth day, no trial,The truth is getting higher and higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-12 17:05:00
Seeing that many people say more than one month from submission to recruitment, and my select is on June 6th, and I am still reviewing it. The article type is paper, this reviewIs time normal?Is it fierce?Please have experienced people to analyze, thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-12 15:15:00
nanoscale Soon, the select and the modification were received in less than a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-12 11:59:00
No external trial, tragedy...Said to make significant progress, the editor of Hong Kong..Now ask for such a high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-10 11:08:00
how difficult is this journal submission, have you selectd?How long does it usually have news?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-29 13:02:00
IF 5.9, just selectd for a 10 day waiting...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-29 11:54:00
haha, not bad, rose to 5.9, hope to keep it, likeACS NANO see Qiha
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [Nanoscale]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy