My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanoscale

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanoscale]Hello, you are Visitor Number 303246 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanoscale
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOSCALE
ISSN2040-3364
h-index176
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.172.3961.338
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q137 / 439

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/nr
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nr
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaCHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume2439
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2040-3364%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 81%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanoscale】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on Nanoscale: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-29 09:37:00
wrote a review article in October about semiconductor photocatalytic materials. Since the content is related to Nanoscale, it was sent to this journal.After 25 days, I came back to review the comments. Three reviewers, two directly received, one small change, is to add some references and sentences.He was repaired two days later and received two days later.In the received mail, the editor attached the comments of the reviewer who had made a small change. The original two days had been edited and submitted for review.The article was online 4 days later.Overall, it’s okay, the first time to write a review, and not a draft, it’s a freelance submission.It took a lot of time before and after, including collecting literature, sorting, summarizing, writing articles, and summarizing the outlook.Looking back at this review, more than 14,000 words, repeated revisions a lot of
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-21 21:40:00
7 submitted at the beginning of the month, waited for nearly two months before returning to the first-instance opinion, overhaul.I am very anxious to repair it in 10 days.I thought that there would be news soon, and the results were nearly two months after the second trial.I decided to accept it after I found the arbitration.However, the editor felt that the language problem still needs to be changed, so he found a retouching agency.Received smoothly.Four months before and after.But anyway, I am very happy to receive it!However, waiting for proof has been waiting for more than 10 days.A little anxious.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-21 09:13:00
Our article has been rejected four times before and after it has been through for half a year. Finally, the journal was changed to submit the journal from submission to rework for about 4 weeks and 27 days. Three reviewers, one overhaul, a minor repair, a direct receiving editor gave the opinion overhaul after two weeks, repaired and second trial for about three weeks and 19 days yesterday, the reception is relatively fast and fair. I hope everyone can wait and feel good.The message of the blessing everyone
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-16 09:59:00
was originally thought to be very fast, the result is 70 days to write a letter asking whether to find a reviewer, the editor wrote back to say that he is waiting for a reviewer's opinion.Originally thought to be arbitrated, 80 days to receive the news, only one expert reviewer's opinion: The authors claimed phase transformation of.... with increasing.... The authors have an appropriate amount of visual characterization data to support their conclus
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-14 11:48:00
I am fighting for another one in 2014. I used to read the blog and I have set up my own door. I don’t know if I have this ability.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-14 11:40:00
From submission to rejection, less than a month, the opinions of the three reviewers all said that it was my introduction, and there was a problem in the sentence: "There is a lot of people doing this.The research, and then each reviewer gave me a few examples, so the sad reminder was rejected, but the speed of review is still very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-05 19:46:00
7 Submitted on the 25th of the month, the review comments on August 29th came back, overhauled, and selectd over three days later, and waited for another month, received the mail directly on September 0, orVery fast.It’s much faster than my SNB. It’s been applied for 4 months, and there’s no news yet.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-02 15:29:00
9.23Submission, 9.24 submitted permission, 10.2 was directly rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-30 09:31:00
The submitment on the 12th of August is now 7 weeks, and there is no news yet.Excuse me, can you remind me?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 12:34:00
has selectd three times.The first 40 days According to the + major change, write a letter to appeal, the editor is not a bird.The second 30 days.The third time 40 days According to + small change (about equal to receiving), edit the data.But gave the opportunity to re-attend.Decisively modify and re-submit, 3 weeks minor change 7 days after the revised draft is received.Note that under the recent article, it seems that there are more articles on CNT+GO+ battery.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-17 22:14:00
One month to return a comment One minor repair and one overhaul Another refusal Editor-in-Chief Jie Liu gave a rejection....哎
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-17 17:25:00
just submitted a review article, about the Nanotube network, sprinkled more than 20 pages, changed several times, selectd for nanoscale, one and a half months were rejected...It’s not that the draft is really difficult. Is it true that this journal is not free to submit?By the way, I recommend a journal that can be reviewed...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-11 19:32:00
has been looking forward to one!The first time, for more than a month, the editor gave a refusal to select again, and then ruthlessly refused, want to appeal, but considering the future to select, decisively give up.The second time directly in the hands of the editor was smashed.This is the third submission and I hope to have a good result...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-10 09:05:00
If it is related to nanomaterials, the content is relatively new and practical, and it is generally easier to receive.Personal experience is that communication is best to hang in this direction of the big cow, because many editors of this journal are Chinese, everyone knows... And I suggest that you don’t choose others to study the bad work, if you study something,There are tens of thousands of articles on the Internet. Who are you willing to review your manuscript?Unless you do it very well.If the content of your research SCI is not much, hundreds of articles may be even less in China. I think that people may have some interest in the trial, and the direction is very important!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-26 09:43:00
Research the first article.The journals that were previously selectd were relatively high and have been rejected. The bitterness and impulsiveness directly submitted nanoscale.2013-7-11 submitted, 2013-8-1 Two reviewers, a major repair, a minor repair.The opinions involved are basically insignificant issues, no need to supplement the data, just a little explanation.2013-8-1 re-submitment, 2013-8-8 reception.Now wait for proof.The overall feeling is that the review speed is faster. By the way, the editor I assigned is Prof. Jianfang Wang, which is very efficient.The IF of 2012 is over 6, and it feels like it is going up.I hope to catch up with small as soon as possible
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-20 09:19:00
first selectd for JMCA and was rejected. I didn’t send it to the editor of Europe who switched to nanoscale in mid-June and then transferred to CMU’s Professor Jin Rongchao.At the beginning of July, I received the comments of the two reviewers in early July. After the small repair was uploaded, the week after receiving the two weeks, the proof checking
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 10:15:00
3.24 was submitted, the review was quick, and 4.8 returned.A minor repair, a rejection, the editor gave the opportunity, overhaul 4.16 repair, re-find a reviewer, 5.3 return, overhaul revised draft 5.28 repaired, 6.12 comments returned, reviewers also let Xiao Xiu, editor directly accept.I have edited it back and forth 3 times, the editing is very good, the review is very fast, and there is usually news within 15 days.The journal requirements are quite high. Many articles are not submitted for trial, and they are directly rejected. Many teachers have selectd here, and they are very tragic.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-13 17:34:00
Submitted on July 31st.On September 16th, I returned to review the comments, minor repairs.A revised draft will be submitted on September 18.Received on September 22.I feel that the review cycle is not as fast as I imagined.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-11 19:25:00
Submitted 15 days after the direct tragedy, did not submit for trial, the speed is not as fast as the legend ah
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-01 17:51:00
6 26th contribution, has been under review until now, already aMore months, the RSC speed is very fast, why not now...Waiting for egg pain
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-18 15:09:00
7 on the 10th select, the publication permission submitted on the 12th, there is still no movement, it is estimated that it is submitted for review, selected Liu Jie to edit, feel related to research,prayer..The journal that selectd for rsc is fancy his speed..
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-18 08:31:00
is very fast...I have submitted for review..At that time, I thought it would not be submitted for review!!Selected white spring ceremony...The last decision letter was issued by Liu jie 2 reviewers, 25 days, the first reviewer overhaul, the second reject!But the second reviewer felt as though he was not doing gas adsorption....The last edit was given to reject!!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-04 18:06:00
Requirements are quite high, many articles are not submitted for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-25 18:59:00
4 At the end of the month, after more than 20 days, I came back to the first-instance opinion, and one overhauled a minor repair.They are all small problems, because they face graduation defense, so they dragged on for half a month until early June.Come over 2 days, come back and receive it directly.The speed is really fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-25 08:57:00
2.22 Submission, 3.26 received a minor repair for a minor repair.The problem of minor repairs is very demanding, and the overhaul is a supplement to regular experiments.Revised the revised manuscript in 4.26 for one month.5.28 Received review comments from two reviewers and also made minor repairs, but the editor accepted them directly.We submitted the revised manuscript, but the publishing editor replied that it was already in typesetting, and these minor repairs were modified in proof.The requirements of all aspects of the article are very high, and the routine experiment can not satisfy the appetite of the reviewer, regardless of the synthesis or characterization.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [Nanoscale]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy