X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 240785 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsIND ENG CHEM RES
ISSN0888-5885
E-ISSN1520-5045
h-index197
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.600.8781.033
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q154 / 336
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemical Engineering (all)
Q153 / 279
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Chemistry (all)
Q184 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)12.30%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/iecred
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume2145
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0888-5885%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 10:18:00
5Submission 17, August 13 returned to minor repair, only one opinion.Return to the revised draft on the 16th.There is no news until now.Minor repairs are accepted for 10 days, and 10 days are also drafted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-14 17:06:00
2 Month kind of a piece
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-26 12:05:00
Why can't I find the manuscript guide, the specific format of the article is not given?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-13 09:43:00
The experiment done in February this year, after finishing the data and articles in one and a half months, submit the manuscript in late March, and then wait, the review comments will be returned at the end of May, overhaul, and the content of the reviewer will be written.About 8 pages or so, I also read a lot of documents carefully during the period. After the overhaul, I dropped it in late June and waited for about 3 weeks to tell me to accept.Now wait for the final final proofreading.Thanks to the support of the small woodworm.In addition, one was selectd at Powder Technology and was being reviewed; another was in Chemical Engineering Science, which was rejected for three and a half months.The review comments are very useful to me. Come on, I believe everyone will have some gains. I support the time of the first submission of each scientific research worker and the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-22 15:58:00
, about 1.5 months later., review comments, 3 reviewers, 21 questions, of which about 7 are about the details, can be ignored.The decision given by the editor was to reject the manuscript, but gave the choice of re-submitment, the time limit was 3 months, and it was considered as a kind of overhaul on the Internet.The other things were delayed for one month. It took a month to make up the experiment and answer. The word for replying to the review comments was longer than the original text. It was re-submited on May 6 and received directly after 1.5 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-01 23:54:00
How to say it, I always wanted to comment, but I haven’t made a pen.This article is really tortuous.At the time, when I chose journals, I was very upset.(1) There is no similar research between the students.Professors don't care.Although our college has a laboratory for cattle, the research direction is too far, and between teachers, it is really "more than learning to help."(2) The experimental part, really can't catch up with those national key laboratories, key laboratories of the Ministry of Education (for example: HZKJDX, HDLGDX, ZJDX, HNLGDX, XAJTDX, etc.).So simple analysis seems too naive for these schools.I started to choose EF journal. The editor is directly influenced by that. I switched to
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-15 10:43:00
to compare the journals that focus on innovation. As long as the ideas are novel, there is the possibility of acceptance after revision. In 2012, it was changed to weekly publication and accepted.It should be easier, let's cheer!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-09 15:15:00
11Invested in December, overhauled in early February, and completed in early April. After a month, there were several minor problems. After 3 days of revision, I accepted it. I feel the environmental hit rate.Very high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-27 21:33:00
The article submitted at the beginning of the year, reviewing the manuscript for 3 and a half months, the editor is the teacher of Li of Zhejiang University. The opinions of the two reviewers are better, or they have been overhauled and carefully revised for two weeks.Voted in and received it two weeks later.I feel that the efficiency is still very high. After all, it is the three major chemical journals. Although the impact factor is lower, it feels better than cej.The reviewer is more professional and responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-19 23:57:00
Submission in late November 2011, received revisions in mid-January, and the three reviewers praised the article for its interestingness, but also proposed a small opinion, which means that I would simply answerA few small questions, make up a little data.At that time, the winter vacation had been dragged and changed.Recently revised the draft.I selectd out on Tuesday and saw just accepted articles online on Saturday night.It is estimated that the editor accepted it directly and did not look at the reviewer again.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-11 22:21:00
IECR is one of the TOP3 journals of chemical industry, and it is also the fastest in the three journals.I submitted the manuscript at the end of December 2011. About 25 days later, around January 25, I received the preliminary review.On the third day of the first month, the editor is Professor Li of Zhejiang University. The holiday is still working, praise one.Two overhauls, one minor repair, and an overhaul by the editor.The revised draft was submitted in mid-February and the minor revision was returned on April 9.Since there were basically no major problems, the revised draft was returned on April 10 and the receiving letter was received on April 11.Quite efficient, like one.The overall feeling is not difficult, the general editor will give the opportunity to modify, for the initial submitment SCI, and the urgent need for SCI, ICTRL is a good choice.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-27 10:26:00
I learned before the first draft that this IECR is also a top journal in the chemical industry, but the boss did not recognize it at the time.I had to work hard to persuade the boss to graduate, and it was a long wait after the submission.During the Christmas period, the time was delayed and I waited for almost 4 months.The review comments are revised and the reviewers' comments are also pertinent and meticulous.The revised manuscript was submitted 10 days later, and it is almost 2 weeks until today, and I am still waiting for the editor's opinion.Personally think that iecr pays more attention to industrial applications, as long as there is no major problem with innovation.Compared with the higher impact factor of CEJ, it is better to look at the quality of the IFFT.I will try hard to try CES and I wish you and everyone a successful graduation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-21 23:40:00
Process system engineering, the overall feeling is not bad, the editor is responsible, the reviewer is more professional, the overall efficiency is more efficient, after the proof also gives you to modify the text, very systematic engineering.There is a relatively innovative research work recommended to ensure the overall quality of the IECR.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-15 07:03:00
My first post was published on this.As the three major journals in the chemical industry, the relative difficulty of the IFFT is worth a try.Mainly reflected in two aspects, first of all, as a journal of ACS, the requirements of ITRI for mathematical analysis are slightly lower, and many articles that do not emphasize engineering calculations will also be included (this is the result of the emergence of various materials and processing technologies in recent years.In the new situation, many classic cows have been published in the history of ISOR.At the same time, due to the applied chemistry background of the IECR, the discussion of the chemical mechanism in the ACS series is not particularly emphasized.So if your research is just decent in both mathematical and chemical analysis, and the work system is solid and slightly new, then IECR is a good choice.But in general,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-11 21:23:00
is a good journal, and the reviewer must be in Europe and America. The first reviewers recommended that the reviewers are older, have no response, and later re-Recommended, I wrote back in 10 days, 2 people listed a total of 15 questions, in general, the evaluation of my article is good, there is no special error.I dragged on for a few days, or later edited me, and I quickly submitted the revised comments.The feeling for me is speed, we are the first to push the thermodynamic calculation Fluid Phase Equilibria, followed by it, but because of the high status of the ICTRL, the boss is very happy to select for this, but it must be innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-09 09:07:00
finally accepted!(mainly can apply for a reply, huh, huh) Share the process: submit on January 5, return to overhaul opinion on February 2 (27 days): Reviewer 1 mentions some issues that are relatively easy to be sharp; reviewers2 said that there are problems in the mechanism part, how should it be? Some theories are suitable, but they are a bit old and how should they be.After careful examination, I found out that the second reviewer was to quote and promote his theory.However, I can accept the theory in his article.After making revisions and answers, the revised draft was submitted on February 29.One week later, on March 6th, I returned to the minor repair opinion: Reviewer 1 said that it can be accepted according to the following modifications (basically all are word errors); Reviewer 2 said that no doubt can be accepted.March 7
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-06 09:08:00
Report to everyone that my submission experience was submitted on October 7, 2011, in the field of chemical reaction engineering, and entered the review stage after two or three days (after 4 months)) Received comments on February 5, 2012 Papers accepted on March 5, 2012
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-29 20:16:00
My IECR was received today, very happy, share your experience with you.I was the first draft of the submitment on August 24 last year. I received the revised opinion on October 27 last year. One reviewer suggested receiving it directly. The second one appreciated the innovation of the article. It is recommended to receive it after revision. It gives a very detailedThere are a lot of opinions that are quite professional and sufficient. The third one seems to be a big cow. It gives a rejection opinion. It only gives the article 40 points. It raises a lot of very sharp questions and strongly reveals the overhaul.I discussed with the instructor, overhauled the article, and submitted the article that was overhauled on December 31 last year.On February 20 this year, I received a comment from Xiao Xiu. It seems that the article after the overhaul only re-examined the second and third reviewers, and received two amendments. This time, the third review draft
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-21 17:27:00
12.4 selectd... 1.29 review back, 4 people, the first 3 questions, the second 11 questions to overhaul, the third to a theoretical summary, the fourth directly OK.The editor made the overhaul, the revised manuscript has been submitted, waiting...Feb. 20 Submission of the manuscript, Mar. 5 Received... The editor will make a serious change, there must be a chance~ Also wish you all the futureSubmitted smoothly~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-15 20:48:00
My first article, submitted on November 24, 2011, received revised comments on January 11, 2012, three reviewers, one rejected, one directly published, oneMinor repair, the editor gave the revision.Received a week or so after the modification.The journal feels very fast.Generally, after more than one month after the repair, no news is given, and the possibility of rejection is greatly increased.Hope it helps you.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-10 16:46:00
Chemical Engineering Journal is higher grade?Should not be!There is no such thing in the three major chemical journals, although its IF is higher!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-10 14:35:00
This journal is actually more general. It is estimated that 60% will not be rejected and the manuscript will be reviewed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-07 21:31:00
1 is delivered on the 10th of the month and is currently waiting anxiously.What I am doing is the practical application of nano-functional materials, partial application, and engineering.This journal is a requirement of our group, so I will work harder and pray for myself.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-04 18:12:00
I also selectd for an article. After the overhaul, I have already returned, my heart is awkward, and I am praying for it...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-04 10:28:00
11 On October 2nd, the select was received, and on November 24th, the revised opinion was received. After one week of revision, it was submitted. On January 6th, it returned the second revision opinion (some minor errors), January.Received on the 11th.It lasted for more than 4 months, the amount is considered to be generally fast...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service