My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 180183 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsENVIRON SCI POLLUT R
ISSN0944-1344
E-ISSN1614-7499
h-index82
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.500.8451.114
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q128 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q132 / 134
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q240 / 122

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)14.00%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11356
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ESPR
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1994
Annual Article Volume3097
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0944-1344%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-11 14:10:00
The editor of this journal is still very nice, that is, the reviewer is very irresponsible. I swear that he never used more than 5 minutes to see my article, and he used a sentence to send it off..I have also tried a lot of manuscripts. Generally, I have to use at least 1-2 days to review the manuscripts word by word, from the framework to the language.I think this is the minimum respect for the hard work of the author.But this time I was rejected very embarrassed!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-30 10:46:00
is not bad, 3 reviewers, one according to, 2 major repairs, the opinions are relatively pertinent, the recommendation method is very useful, it is very helpful to me, the response has written 9 pages, and the modification is accepted..Haha, in addition, color page free is also a highlight.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-08 12:35:00
reviewed the above several manuscripts, the quality of the manuscript is general, personally feel that the quality of the above article is in the middle of the middle of the environmental journal, in view of the EP in the middle, the quality of the manuscript is generally lower than the EP.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-07 16:37:00
I selectd for an article, showing the first state after a week, With Editor.A week later, October 9th, it shows as under review.We look forward to good news!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-26 15:45:00
Published in September 2012, 4 days later, under review, October 11th, review, 3 reviewers, 2 minors, one manuscript, the final editor, very nice, gave me a major overhaul, November 9 last.Accepting the submission experience is that the review speed is good. The editor is also very good. After a good return, I suddenly found that ESPR has recently issued a lot of albums with more than 60 articles in each issue and there are more than 300 online first.Can it be officially published in more than a year?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-26 22:31:00
12In January, I selectd for an editor and stayed for more than a month. I began to review the manuscript for three months. I changed the reviewer and tried it for another month. The result was directly rejected.Opportunity for repair
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-22 15:32:00
attitude decides everything
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-14 08:57:00
General 2-3 reviewers, recently submitted an article, 40 days for review comments, to be repairedThe overhaul was carefully revised according to the review comments, and the attitude was the most important. The revised manuscript was received 10 days after the return.From submission to receiving more than 2 months, the speed is still quite fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-22 14:17:00
Originally selectd for a journal of about 3.5 was rejected, and later changed the journal, but the article was modified before re-submitment, so it was accepted smoothly.The height is still relatively fast, almost a month and a half, not as slow as the online said.The two reviewers were also relatively responsible. After the overhaul, they asked three conceptual questions for me to explain, and then directly accepted them. It took about two months.The comprehensive evaluation is still a good environmental science comprehensive journal, but unfortunately this year, IF has also risen a bit, and it is approaching three.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-02 19:11:00
recently submitted an article, based on the number, estimated the next year's contributionThe amount is around 650, the editor directly rejects 1/3, and then rejects 1/3 in the review process, and finally only about 200 can be sent out.In the first phase of 2010, the editor-in-chief wrote an editorial, saying that Chinese people contributed 1/5 of the contributions, but many articles were directly rejected and did not review the manuscript.This journal is generally like how it is so difficult to select. Some time ago, I selectd for Science OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. I was rejected by a BT reviewer. The editor told me that the acceptance rate is 25%.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-23 14:52:00
I feel that I have reviewed the manuscript and I have two articles in this journal.One of them, a reviewer didn't understand it at all, and I did a very strict rebuttal (the reviewer actually denied the statistical method), and the result was accepted directly!However, personal feeling journals have higher requirements for details, such as references, punctuation, table format, etc.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 环境Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-15 23:32:00
(1) Someone needs to be recommended before submitting the journal, that is, after the article is published, the articleResponsible Editor of the homepage; (2) The journal receives research papers and reviews; (3) The review cycle is relatively long, and I publish two papers in the journal, the first review cycle is 6 months.The second chapter is nearly one year (from submission to reception); (4) usually three reviewers, the review is more rigorous, and the opinions are more pertinent; (5) the editor of the journal is better to speak, if three reviewers are among the threeIf there is a comment that is not very positive, you can take the initiative and the editor to fight for it. If you carefully modify it, you still have the hope to publish it (personal opinion, for reference only);
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service