X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Energy & Environmental Science

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Energy & Environmental Science]Hello, you are Visitor Number 233492 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleEnergy & Environmental Science
Journal Title AbbreviationsENERG ENVIRON SCI
ISSN1754-5692
E-ISSN1754-5706
h-index279
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
51.6014.4864.922
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q11 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q11 / 122
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Q11 / 66
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Q12 / 195

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)2.30%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ee
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ee
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2008
Annual Article Volume268
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1754-5692%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 44%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Energy & Environmental Science】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on Energy & Environmental Science: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-13 18:08:00
I would like to ask the insect friends who sent EES four months to the news. Is your message for exactly four months still more than four months?I have been submitteding an article for four months. I have no news until now. I am considering whether to send emails to remind me/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-13 10:41:00
This journal should specify the editor?How did the article I just selectd go all the way to the under review state.Do not know if it is submitted for review?Or is the editor not assigned?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-09 04:18:00
submitted a review, after one and a half months, the boss sent a letter to remind, one day after receiving a reply, four reviewers, three comments received a small change, a direct rejection, the editor recommended to publish.However, there were a lot of opinions on the small reforms, and more than 30 pages were written one by one.In general, the journal's draft rate is getting higher and higher, it is estimated that with the if water long ship is high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-05 09:27:00
original submitment energy enviromental science review manuscript three months two minor repair one repairThe problem is 5, and the result is rejected by the so-called senior reviewers. If you don't want to break down, you will compress CC into CC, review the draft for 13 days, and receive two (should be the original EES reviewer), a minor repair, upload two days later.Received on the same day, it is a bit regrettable.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-29 20:56:00
9.2 contribution, 10.8 return, 4 reviewers, two minor repairs, one overhaul, one without mentioning the problem, then editIt is recommended to transfer to JMC and be exempt from review.Not reconciled, 10.13 rebuttal, so far more than half a month, it is estimated to be re-examined..Pray for success ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-01 14:02:00
contribution for two months, five review drafts, minor repairs. Return, retrial, return, minor repair. Return. Request strict.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-26 21:01:00
optimistic about thisJournals are now very strict, and it is getting harder and harder to select. There will be a big increase in the impact factor next year.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-24 09:10:00
The thief boat, oh, for a few days, even the license is wood.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-03 21:46:00
The review speed is very slow, and it is accepted in four months for
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 22:24:00
710, and has been under review.On August 27th, the status changed to "transfer", and it is still in this state. What is the situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-28 16:00:00
Seeing the comments of the insect friends, basically after 2013, I was rejected. My article was selectd for 50 days without any news. It is estimated that it is also fierce.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-12 05:48:00
After the submission is under review, it has been about 50 days later, the results, 2 reviews are said that the work is not innovative enough for this level of journals, it is recommended to switch to other journals of RSC, editor-in-chief recommended transferTo RSC ADV, hey, don't want to change, or try another publisher. It feels that it is getting harder and harder now. As long as the work is done more comprehensively last year, it is still very easy. It seems that I still do my own work.Ok, keep up the good work and continue to cheer!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 15:59:00
Very good journal, although rejected, I still appreciate the opinions of reviewers, which is very instructive, good journals are not the same~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 15:21:00
submitted an article in mid-March, and then waited around 50 days for review comments.The tragedy is the situation of the former brother.Among the three reviewers, two of the reviewers raised a question and recommended it. The other reviewer was very serious. He raised three questions and pointed out some problems in the article. The comments were revised.Published.Then they were vetoed by a person they called "Adjudicator". The reason given by this person was that the question mentioned by the reviewer was justified. The article did have these problems, so that the article was rejected!Then the editor gave me a recommendation to PCCP~ After I saw the review comments, I only thought that it would be awkward!What the horse does not say ~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-02 10:40:00
Thirteen days give the results, did not submit for review, refused, said the article grade is not enough, but recommended to select Green Chemistry.In fact, I know that my article is not suitable for publication on this because the product yield is relatively low, although the method is very new and environmentally friendly.A little bit reluctant to switch to Green Chemistry, I feel that this method will open up a new field and is very practical.Look at the boss's meaning.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-17 14:30:00
Please note that the rejection rate for EES is currently~85% of submitted manuscript. EES continues to enjoy great success as a journal, attracting much attention and publishing important articlefrom world-leading research groups.Send
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 23:04:00
submited an article at the beginning of the year, reviewed the draft for about 40 days, received the review comments, all three reviewers agreed to publish, only minor repairs were required.But EES recently added a flat Senior referee.This Senior referee has no bounds and has a comment on my manuscript. It lacks innovation and has no substantive opinions.In the end, the editor-in-chief rejected the manuscript, which is really puzzling!Write Rebuttal letter representation, reply after about 3, to maintain the original judgment.Therefore, please think about everyone who wants to submit in EES.Since EES makes decisions directly based on the opinions of Senior referee, why not let them review first and then send them to other reviewers?I have also been a reviewer of EES before. As it seems, serious
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-20 14:01:00
has been throwing out for one month, and is currently under reviewing the status. The quality of the manuscript is indeed up, and the review period has also become longer.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-16 16:35:00
I have been 51 days, or under review!After
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-26 09:17:00
was submitted, it was released for just 30 days, and was directly rejected by the editor Dr Michael Spencelayh.The quality of the manuscript is not high, but you can't do it anyway!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-19 10:35:00
Like EES!The editor was very nice, and after receiving the review for one month, he did not receive the feedback from the reviewer. The editor took the initiative to apologize and accepted it directly after the revision.I sincerely hope that EES will be better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-16 10:44:00
Reviewing just one month, both reviewers said that they were very interesting but the results were not good, the final tragedy!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-10 16:36:00
EES was submited in the previous period. The first reviewer gave no comments, and the second person thought it might not be with this journal.After finding the third person, the result is even more uncomfortable. The reason for rejecting the manuscript is that our value is not the largest in the whole field. However, the highlight of our article is to reveal a law.I was very upset and ran into a troublesome reviewer.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-10 12:25:00
Previously, the lab selectd twice, all of which were tragedy. One of them was recommended to be changed to JMC after reviewing the manuscript.Recently selectd for an article, about 40 days in the first trial, two minor repairs, the editor gave a major repair.21 days after overhaul, receive directly.The speed is still ok, not fast or slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-05 17:28:00
communication has been submitted for 40 days, and there is no news yet.In the end, what is the situation of God horse?Blessing ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [Energy & Environmental Science]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service