Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | CANCER LETTERS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | CANCER LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0304-3835 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1872-7980 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 2.40% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/506050/description#description | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://ees.elsevier.com/can/default.asp?acw=3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, ELSEVIER HOUSE, BROOKVALE PLAZA, EAST PARK SHANNON, CO, CLARE, IRELAND, 00000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Biweekly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1975 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 426 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0304-3835%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 3.3 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 52.27% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 8.3 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on CANCER LETTERS: | Write a review |
Author: 1562811340@qq.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-21 15:00:00 I’m wondering if anyone who has submitted to Cancer Letters can provide some details on their experience(s). I’m researching cell identification. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 346132356@qq.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-24 22:49:52 Two reviewers agreed to accept the manuscript, but the editor consider it contains too many language problem, even after three times language editing by Elsevier, under recommendation of editor and journal, and Elsevier considered it well written. Editor reject it for language problem. Editor-in-Chief ask me to re-submit, then was reject for not reaching standard for peer-review.Are you kidding me ?!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 2225312559@qq.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-21 10:07:07 Go through the decision in process, what happens! ![]() ![]() |
Author: NZ Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-01 15:47:11 This journal 3500 word limit includes title and abstract? ![]() ![]() |
Author: wy111 Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-12-27 11:50:35 basic and translational oncology ![]() ![]() |
Author: Bjn Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-11-10 10:46:37 rejection process is quite fast, and quickly turned to other ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-19 17:45:34 What should I do?Submitted on April 28, underreview after three days, but received the review comments on August 5.Two reviewers, one raised a small question, the other had no problem, gave a month to modify, but the boss said to get back in a week.For more than three months, the results were somewhat blurred. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-04-04 00:56:00 two days to receive a rejection letter,It is said that their journal acceptance rate is only 40%, so unfortunately they did not meet their evaluation criteria. In fact, the article is still very innovative. Because of the time, the whole project has not been completed. After returning to China, there is no way to add experiments. MaybeThe content is not rich enough.It feels quite difficult.Now the article has been submitted to another journal with more than 4 points of influence factor. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-23 12:54:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-04-21 00:27:00 involves some aspects of the mechanism,It's easier to be accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 肿瘤相关均可 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-08-24 22:27:00 The medium difficulty is medium, but the entry point is relatively new. The chances are quite large. When you submit the manuscript, you should recommend several reviewers for free review. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |