3.3, it was transferred from ChemcatChem; around 3.6, Energy Technology sent an email to us for confirming the submission; around 4.15, the first review required a major revision, two reviewers gave us 10 days for modification. I applied for an extension of 10 days in the middle (it was wasted); 5.13, revision submitted for the second review. The previous second reviewer had no further questions, and the first reviewer asked three questions; 5.19, about 4 pm, second revision submitted; around 8 pm, we received the acceptance notification from the editorial office via email. Summary: The review time for the first review was about 40 days. The submission process was always under consideration. I hope it will help the friends afterwards.

(12) Thank | 七秒钟的记忆a

The real-time impact factor is 3.164. The basic version in December 2019 is still the official one, and this trial upgrade version is only a reference. The real transition will take two or three years. I hope the journal will get better and better.

(9) Thank | ZERO-I

2018.12.29 Submitted; 2019.1.11 With editor; 2019.1.12 Under review; 2019.3.6 Major revision; 2019.3.14 In revision; 2019.3.20 Under review; 2019.3.26 Accepted.

(3) Thank | 水熊虫

My paper is on lithium battery material synthesis and numerical simulation of electrochemistry. We first submitted to Chemsuschem but was rejected without review, and it was transferred to Energy Technol. It was under review after 5 days, and we  received the review comments in 20 days later. The evaluations from the reviewers were good, and the suggestion was acceptance with minor revision. We added the electrochemical data and physical characterization, as well as citations, and submitted the revised version after 5 days. The paper was accepted 10 days later, and we were invited for cover art suggestion. A total of about 40 days. Next time before submission, the experiments should be complete, and the result analysis and discussion should be in depth and comprehensive, because some reviewers are really critical, and they pay attention to every detail. I respect that. I’m optimistic about this journal!

(1) Thank | wildcallbingo@gmail.com

The questions raised by the journal reviewers are very professional, and the review speed depends on the editor's progress. I submitted my paper on December 13th and received the first review in mid-January of the following year, which may have been delayed due to the Christmas holidays. The feedback in late February required minor revisions and one major revision, with a turnaround time of around 20 days. Finally, my paper was accepted! The journal's efficiency and the overall experience with the editors and reviewers were excellent, making it a good choice for submission.

(0) Thank | 小瓜0o

Is there no email notification when the submission is under review now? Can we only check the progress on the website?

(0) Thank | 不吃香菜（爱吃香菜版）

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 4.6 accept

(0) Thank | khrislee

2.6 accept

Please translate the following passage into English: 2.6 accept

(0) Thank | khrislee

Brother, how are you doing? Any updates?

(0) Thank | Yaoguojia1

Submitted on the 20th. It's also in this state.

(0) Thank | Yaoguojia1

Submitted on March 13th, it has been half a month and the status is still "submitted", without any "with editor" update. Is this journal progressing so slowly? Any recent submission buddies to exchange experiences with?

(0) Thank | 瓜娃子-guagua

Rework with editor 3.14

(0) Thank | khrislee

2.24 major revise

(0) Thank | khrislee

Is the manuscript submitted according to the format requirements of the official website?

(0) Thank | khrislee

Can you please clarify if the submission of the manuscript should follow the format requirements on the official website, or if it is free format?

(0) Thank | khrislee

January 13th major Revision
February 7th revised manuscript submission
February 17th under review

(0) Thank | HPYNB

Hello, I also submitted to this journal. Can I ask you a few questions and maybe add you as a friend?

(0) Thank | HPYNB

Hello, may I ask how to change the reference format of this journal?

(0) Thank | BreezyChan

Submitting an article is not easy, everyone, keep up the good work!!!

(0) Thank | 锂电池冷却

10.29 submission
11.4 editing
11.12 reminder for submission
11.14 under review (0/0/5)
12.12 revise
12.24 revision requested
1.6 resubmission
1.26 acceptance. It took 89 days, with a break for Christmas in between
2.5 proofreading
2.10 (online)
Overall, the speed is acceptable, it is considered a reputable journal. The feedback provided is professional. It is also free of charge. The only downside is that they may scare you during the final proofreading stage, trying to get you to purchase their print version journal. You can simply ignore this. In general, it is worth submitting to this journal.

(0) Thank | 锂电池冷却

It has been almost a week since UR.

(0) Thank | 小瓜0o

11.24 submit
12.1 under review
1.11 under review

(0) Thank | khrislee

This journal is like this, it took me two weeks to submit and one week with the editor.

(0) Thank | 000021

I submitted my manuscript one day before you, and now I am also with the editor!

(0) Thank | 各位院士发发发

I submitted on December 13th and it is currently with the editor.

(0) Thank | 小瓜0o