During the epidemic period, all main journals received articles very slowly. It has been more than ten days since New Submission. It has been delayed too much for students due to this epidemic. Submission and review have slowed down, which seriously affected the graduation.

(0) Thank | 天堂鸟5349

To correct a few errors: 1. This journal is issued in Japan and published by Springer in Germany, which is a Japanese academic journal. 2. The full name of the journal is "Earth, Planets and Space", and the ISO standard abbreviation format is "Earth Planets Space".

(0) Thank | Flaire_liu

6/7/2019, the manuscript was submitted to a special issue. The editor is a guest (editor), who didn’t process in time. It was sent for external review at the end of September, and it was reviewer assigned; 03/1/2020, minor revision; 28/3/2020, accept. The reviewers were very professional, and the revision comments hit the nail on the head. The innovation and fun were highly affirmed, and it was accepted after minor revision. In general, it is a pleasure submission experience.

(4) Thank | 李老师

May 26 Submitted. Manuscript processing is very fast, and the journal has risen to Q3 in 2018. Many published papers are on earthquakes. June 07 to July 09 First review: two reviewers, major revision and minor revision, and increasing data processing time. Aug. 19 to Oct. 16 Second review: two reviewers, major revision and minor revision, plus improving the language. Nov. 26 to Dec. 9 Third review: acceptance after minor revision. The editor and reviewers were very responsible, especially the editor, who was very patient.

(4) Thank | 好久不见

12.09 minor revisions, returned after modification on the same day, accepted on 12.10. It took a total of four and a half months from submission on 7.29 to acceptance on 12.10, with one major revision and two minor revisions during this period. The major revision was given one month, and the minor revisions were given three weeks each. Due to personal delays during the first two revisions, I only returned the revised manuscript close to the deadline. If I had been more efficient, it would have been possible to complete the process in three months. Overall, the feedback on the EPS (manuscript) was good, with careful and thorough review. It is indeed a well-recognized journal in the third zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Tips: Adding or removing co-authors can be complicated, so it is recommended to determine the number and order of authors before submitting the manuscript.

(2) Thank | Shawn001

7.29 submit; 8.6 under review; 9.15 review completed; 9.19 major revision; 10.17 sent back; 11.04 minor revision; 11.24 sent back; It has been 4 months now, the minor revision was sent back, still waiting for the results. Overall, the reviewing speed of EPS is quite fast, and the raised questions are quite detailed, and the reviewing experts are also quite professional. Hopefully, there will be a good outcome soon. Let's encourage each other.

(1) Thank | Shawn001

Magazine is OK, the review comments are relatively pertinent, the journal editor is very responsibleBut this journal is from Japan, not Germany

(4) Thank | waal334@163.com