A very disappointing submission. The editors and reviewers were not professional. There were two reviewers, and it took three months to receive their feedback. The overall comments were positive, but each reviewer had 1-2 very unprofessional issues, such as not reading the article carefully or having a knowledge gap. From my understanding, only minor revisions were needed, at most major revisions. However, the editor decided to reject it. I have published dozens of articles and am a PI myself, but I encountered such a bizarre journal for the first time. I initially wanted to support domestic SCI journals, but I have decided to blacklist this journal in the future as it wasted my time.

(0) Thank | antifoamer

May I know more regarding the page charge?
What is this about?

I want to choose close-access only, not going to pay. But during submission, where I am required to do some confirmation ticks, I have to tick on a page charge option. Which is do not understand. Does it mean that I have to pay per page?

(0) Thank | jlsp

What is the current status? Has it been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | Nice Goals

It has been two weeks since I applied, and I have been in the "pending allocation" status all along. I sent an email to urge them, but they just told me to keep waiting. Sigh, it's another day of envying those with connections.

(0) Thank | Gutduaner

It has been a week since the application was submitted, how is the progress of your process?

(0) Thank | 奉天向卉

How is it going? Any updates? It's been two weeks and I still haven't been assigned an editor.

(0) Thank | 坂田高原

Hello, I just wanted to ask if you received the message in the end. It's been a week since I sent it to you.

(0) Thank | 清华小姐姐

1-29 Submission
2-14 Review feedback
2-20 Revision
3-8 Pre-acceptance
3-13 Formatting revision
3-14 Accepted

(0) Thank | dmj1998

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Focused research areas: Neuroscience; Aging; Memory
Timeline for submission: Submission by 1-29, Review feedback by 2-14, Revision by 3-8, Pre-acceptance by 3-13, Final acceptance after formatting revision by 3-14

(0) Thank | 震雷艺诺

What's your current status?

(0) Thank | 无妄摄提格

Research focus: Sharing of experiences with schizophrenia: It has been almost a week since submission, but the manuscript has not been assigned to an editor yet. I plan to use it for my graduation. Can any experts share their experiences with submissions? Thank you

(0) Thank | 八荒建玲

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":":

需要？

(0) Thank | Ina Gregory

Do we need to provide the raw data for this journal in the later stage?

(0) Thank | 金蛇红运

Do you need to provide original data for this journal?

(0) Thank | 金蛇红运

The first full paper in life
Submitted in September 2021, results came out at the end of October, major revisions required.
Revised and resubmitted after one month, minor revisions completed by the end of December.
Received acceptance in mid-February, with even more additions than the first major revision.
Hope this journal continues to improve!

(1) Thank | henryhkust

I have the same question!

(0) Thank | 初柳超级甜

Do you need to upload the original image of WB?!

(0) Thank | Albert Morley

Choose the topic for in-depth discussion; discuss the selected topic from multiple perspectives in a structured manner, with logical reasoning, clear explanation, and thorough analysis

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Highlight the innovation of your research, demonstrate significant characteristics that differentiate from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue, the key is to have a distinction, as long as there is a difference, it is innovation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a profound discussion? How to deepen the depth of discussion?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

How to highlight the innovation of the article in the discussion?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

How is the progress of this magazine this year? Why has no editor been assigned for a week?

(0) Thank | Griselda Ingersoll

How is the progress of the magazine this year? Why hasn't an editor been assigned even after a week?

(0) Thank | Griselda Ingersoll

Do you charge a page fee?

(0) Thank | 铁头翠槐

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: When submitting in 2017, I felt that the review process was quite strict and the requirements were high. The review speed was about one month, slightly longer compared to what I found online. It took about three months from submission to acceptance, with repeated reminders for revisions. Without reminders, it would probably take four months, and publication would require nearly half a year. This journal is getting better now and may improve further

(0) Thank | 傲寒平卉