Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

Food & Function

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[Food & Function]Hello, you are Visitor Number 54158 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleFood & Function
Journal Title AbbreviationsFOOD FUNCT
ISSN2042-6496
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.62Food Science (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
22 / 255

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)8.40%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/fo
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/food
Open AccessNo
Publisher
Subject AreaBIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2010
Annual Article Volume444
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2042-6496%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: Average 1 Month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Food & Function】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Food & Function: Write a review
Author: 小面鱼


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-07 10:03:45
I feel the review process is fast. Some people say that the review time is long, may be because their papers are on different topics than mine. The initial review is took one month, and the decision was major revision, no deadline. However, I felt I shouldn’t wait too long to resubmit, so I set a timeframe of 45 days for myself. However, something happened and I felt I wouldn’t be able to finish on time so I wrote to the editor. The editor quickly responded. Eventually I used months to revise the paper. The editor was very nice, replied soon, and accepted the paper about one month after my re-submission. Very efficient, I think.

(1) Thank | 小面鱼

Author: 我是31235


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 15:48:13
Fancy the reputation of RSC, submitted it for 4 days and have not submitted it for review. Expect good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 我是31235

Author: 23145736@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-15 21:53:37
Junk Journal!!!In October last year, the first trial took more than six months to overhaul. The problem was not a lot. It was also seriously revised. After the repair, I continued to wait. After 4 months, I was rejected. I did not explain why.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 23145736@qq.com

Author: han


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 16:15:31
The submission speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too strong.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | han

Author: han


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 16:15:10
Submitting the review speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | han

Author: 来了


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 22:38:04
Check the weight before submiting?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 来了

Author: sunyifan529@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-29 10:21:21
submitted in February, acceptd in May, the interim trial time is relatively long, the editor is super nice, and it is so patience to encounter such procrastination as me.I am very grateful. The external review opinion is very pertinent. It is directly accepted after the revision of the opinion. It is the animal experiment that requires ethical certification. This part is only reissued after the notification is received, but it is best to write it when submitting the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | sunyifan529@163.com

Author: 爱科研的小萝卜


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 23:52:17
3月31SubmissionApril 6th external auditReturn opinion on May 9th, minor repairRevised on May 16Accepted on May 21Overall, it is still very fast, and the opinions are very fair.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 爱科研的小萝卜

Author: 彦北


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-13 15:46:43
Seeing the reputation of RSC, the submission was really not disappointing.Innovative requirements, strong experimental design, editorial and reviewers are very professional, and very small questions are pointed out.The review status changes quickly. Each time the revision is made, the editor will send it to the reviewer for re-examination. It is a journal that is flourishing and expects a new breakthrough in the impact factor.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 彦北

Author: 花逝


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-16 08:39:42
Submitted on January 21, overhauled on March 5, rehabilitated on March 20, accepted on April 18.The reviewers are friendly and the questions they ask are not difficult to answer.Overall it is better.Hope it could help everyone!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 花逝

Author: 花逝


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-14 14:07:59
I would like to ask if this journal is a district of the Academy of Sciences.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 花逝

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-09 10:40:00
7月3日,Submission 8.19 Received feedback for repair; 9.5 days for submission; 9.8 days for about 2 months before and after acceptance!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 21:56:00
was invited as a reviewer and there is no deadline for reviewing!19天审会
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 11:30:00
The quality of the article is not bad, but the impactThe factor is not high, only the first estimate is to compare with ACS's jafc. If you select for this journal, don't worry about IF. After all, RSC's reputation is there
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Food & Function]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.