My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Journal of Functional Foods

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Journal of Functional Foods]Hello, you are Visitor Number 57192 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJournal of Functional Foods
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ FUNCT FOODS
ISSN1756-4646
h-index63
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.900.9981.235
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
Q133 / 299
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Nutrition and Dietetics
Q129 / 120
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Q142 / 219

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.80%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-functional-foods/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/jff/
Open AccessNo
Publisher
Subject AreaFOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume564
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1756-4646%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Journal of Functional Foods】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Journal of Functional Foods: Write a review
Author: qiaozhi1005@outlook.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-17 00:04:03
20th Oct. With editor; 4th Nov Under review; 15th Nov Under editor evaluation; 20th Nov Under editor evaluation; 28th Nov Under editor evaluation; 9th Dec major revision; 2th Jan Revision submitted; 15th Jan Accept. It took 3 months from submission to acceptance, spanning Christmas and New Year. Reviewer comments came back in one month. Six reviewers; I was exhausted making the revisions, but did learn a lot! Give a like to the efficiency of Editor Aluko, who even worked on weekends and evenings!

(0) Thank | qiaozhi1005@outlook.com

Author: 麒麟才子


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-29 15:20:25
8 October 2018 Submitted15 October 2018 Under review11 November 2018 Major corrections (5 review drafts)2 December 20183 December 2018 Minor corrections (Editor asks for more information)19 December 201819 December 2018 Accepted (delivered in the morning, received notice at night)21 December 2018 Received Proof correctionsSubmit to accept fast, efficient journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 麒麟才子

Author: 饲养员


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-27 11:02:17
Revised in 1.5 months.There are 4 reviewers, but only 3 return opinions, all of which are 3-4 pages of opinions, very serious review comments, very professional.I feel that this journal has high requirements and is reviewed by professionals.I hope I can!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 饲养员

Author: 华山论剑


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-05 09:27:49
The review speed is fast, but the review is very strict. The reviewers are all big bulls in the industry. They can point out the shortcomings of the article. It is recommended to have innovative articles to select here, for water articles.Please detour, don't waste time, very good journals, 1 district journals, many big cows are posting articles in this journal, like Sun Dawen, Mike Gidley, etc.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 华山论剑

Author: daad


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-07 14:41:48
has high requirements for innovation and high requirements for language (British English).From submission to receiving 2-3 months
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | daad

Author: Sir


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-25 19:57:57
I really want to slap someone who has made it difficult to make a submission, and the people around me selectd a few, no one.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Sir

Author: fighting


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-25 19:48:58
In a word, it is too difficult.However, the reviewer is really a cow, and the questions raised are also admired. Although rejected, I still learned a lot.Come on and shock again.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | fighting

Author: Miss Tang


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-25 11:02:59
1 month zero 1 week back to the review results, a total ofFour expert opinions, the first three evaluations of the article are not bad, I feel like the post-repair can be sent, the fourth expert is like the editor-in-chief, the language is more sharp, rejected mainly because of him, speed is OK, language requirementsHigher, need to write a bright spot description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Miss Tang

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-19 18:46:14
6.18 just received an article, selectd for 3.17.The review speed is fast, and the editors and reviewers are very rigorous and communicate well.The level of expression in English is relatively high.It is biased towards animal experiments and antioxidant mechanisms.Compared with innovation, the content of the article is more complete.It is expected that the impact factor will continue to rise this year.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Jushou


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-06 12:41:30
The journal reviewer is very professional, and the article is innovative and logical.High, English should be written very well.The editor is very serious and responsible, very small mistakes, and the flaws in the method can be seen, such a journal, the impact factor does not rise is difficult.The rejection rate is very high, but the reviewer's opinion is very pertinent. It is worthwhile to have innovative results, and it is expected to become the leading researcher of functional food ingredients.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Jushou

Author: 天天


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-30 15:20:27
just received an article.Three revisions before and after finally ushered in the reception, the integrity and innovation requirements of the article data are relatively high, the editorial attitude is very serious, even very small mistakes are pointed out, the first trial of twenty days and two trials waited for twoMonths, such a rigorous editorial article does not affect the factor is not difficult
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | 天天

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-31 19:02:20
many articles in this journal feel very good, biased towards nutrition and animal experiments, journalsThe requirements for English are relatively high. The content of the article should be related to the journal. At the same time, it is easier to receive with higher innovation. Otherwise, the possibility of tragedy is greater.At the same time, the journal editor is super responsible, very good communication, and the journal has certain development potential.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 落落


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-08-29 23:57:21
experienced four major overhauls before and after, the editor was super responsible, all kinds of revision opinions were swayed, and finally I finally waited for the reception.I can only say that this journal has great potential for development and is looking forward to it.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 落落

Author: wanling


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-07-30 19:13:07
was rejected, the request is very strict
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wanling

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-22 12:44:00
has accepted two articles, all accepted within three months, the short period of publication, the only journal with no tragic traces in the submission system, the factor has beenUp
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-22 17:04:00
MyThe first article in English selectd for JFF. After submitting the manuscript for three months, he received a letter of rejection. There was only one reviewer's opinion. He felt that the reviewer was not a colleague. The traditional effect of the traditional Chinese medicine for medicine and food written in English was questioned.The problem is not to receive studies on the efficacy of plant extracts, requiring a clear qualitative and quantitative chemical composition of the extract.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-02 23:48:00
This journal feels good, at least the editorial attitude is very good.In food journals, the impact factor is also good.Basically, the review period is about three months. If the repair is completed, the returned manuscript must be answered within 10 days and will be accepted.If the content is more comprehensive and the time is more appropriate, it is a good choice for the food professional to select for this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-24 19:30:00
requirements are still relatively strict, but the review period is within 2 months, the editors exchange very well, usually after the first trial, after the revision, the editor makes his own decision.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-21 09:48:00
2011 The impact factor soared, before it was 1 point more
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-27 01:47:00
biased nutrition, the scope of submission is wider, the review speed is OK, no layout requiredFees, color pages do not charge.But it is a quarterly journal, and the publishing speed is slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Journal of Functional Foods]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service