2019.4.8, the first draft was submitted; 2019.8.30, major revision was required in the first review; 2020.5.30, minor revision was required in the second review; 2020.6.21, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.22, editor assigned; 2020.6.25, accept.

(10) Thank | Focus

I submitted the manuscript in December, major revision was given after 3 months of the first review, minor revision was given after a month of the second review, and it was accepted 3 days after submission.

(7) Thank | tfyzft

December 30, 2019, Accepted after minor revisions were made; January 15, 2020, revised submission, and the status was editor assign; January 19, 2020, the status changed to under review; February 16, 2020, the status changed to editor assign; February 19, 2020, the notice of acceptance was received.

(0) Thank | 加油，虫虫

This journal is relatively easy, but the review period is long. The review is rigorous; my paper was revised 3 times before it was accepted.

(5) Thank | wxlcrazy@sohu.com

This is when the editor cannot find a reviewer, so they ask you to change the page numbers. If you send it back after making the changes and they still can't find a reviewer, there is a high probability that it will be returned to you to change the page numbers again. I received this kind of response twice when it was sent back to me.

(0) Thank | hbuter

Can I ask you all, when editing, should it be based on the 10-page manuscript submitted after major revisions, or the 10 pages of the published version? I noticed that the published pages of the journal are 210mm*279mm, while the pages of the Springer template are the normal A4 size of 210mm*297mm. Now, with exactly 10 pages of A4 size, there is basically no blank space left. Will they ask for length changes after submission?

(0) Thank | hy85

I also submitted the minor revisions like this, and the editor has been unable to invite reviewers for almost 2 weeks. Should we remind them?

(0) Thank | Qaq

The revisions based on the reviewer's comments should not exceed 10 pages.

(0) Thank | hy85

Follow-up on this issue: Such emails are due to the manuscript being too long (even 10 pages will be considered as such); it should be related to the editor.

(0) Thank | tttttttttttttt

What's the deal with this kind of revision feedback? Can anyone who understands it give me some pointers? I'm really anxious.
Historical status diagram 1, requesting feedback on diagram 2.
Submitted on April 19;
Invited reviewers on May 6 and then directly requested revisions;
I saw that when others submitted before, there were many different statuses in the middle, such as reviewer acceptance, and then the revision feedback included downloading the reviewer's questions. I only have one editorial comment and that's it. Can someone help me out, please?
I have quite a few references, so I ended up shrinking them down quite a bit. Could that be the issue? Should I put them back to their original size and shorten them to ten pages?

(0) Thank | illusia

I am just over ten pages, so it may be required that there are only references in the tenth page.

(0) Thank | lzy0916

My paper is not over 10 pages and it is already showing as having completed the review.

(0) Thank | tttttttttttttt

I am the same, I have no idea what's going on.

(0) Thank | lzy0916

I also received a similar reply today, but without any editorial comments. Does anyone know if the paper exceeded 10 pages?

(0) Thank | liuhe23

Why did the editor ask me to make changes, but I have no opinions in the email, not even attachments, how should I deal with this situation 5555555

(0) Thank | tttttttttttttt

Received the review invitation from the journal, found out it was A-san's article, with a manuscript of over twenty pages.

(0) Thank | 迪斯尼王子

I would like to ask how many pages can be submitted for the Signal, Image Video Processing journal. I saw on the official website that double column submissions cannot exceed 10 pages, and only a single template is provided. Can anyone please provide guidance on this?

(0) Thank | 我好困困

Hello, I also share the same opinion. May I ask how you would like to submit it?

(0) Thank | jiaomaiqi

Could you please provide a translation of the following paragraph into English: The comments given by the reviewer are completely irrelevant to the theme and background of the submission, which may have been copied incorrectly. How should we respond to this situation, and are there any similar solutions available?

(0) Thank | wxc163

Acceptance of your manuscript is conditional on all authors agreeing to our publication policies at: https://www.springernature.com/gp/policies/editorial-policies

Do you have this in your email? What is it, will there be a confirmation link for us later?

(0) Thank | Passion_Fruit

Acceptance of your manuscript is conditional on all authors agreeing to our publication policies at: https://www.springernature.com/gp/policies/editorial-policies
Do you have this in your email? What is this, will the confirmation link be provided to us later?

(0) Thank | Passion_Fruit

You should still download the two-column format from the author's guide. Hello, I would like to ask about the early process. Can I add you as a friend to ask questions?

(0) Thank | jiaomaiqi

Hello, I have added you as a friend and would like to inquire about matters related to submitting to this journal. Thank you!

(1) Thank | jiaomaiqi

Submit on February 28, 2025
Minor revisions on March 24, 2025
Resubmit on April 8, 2025
Hired on April 18, 2025
Very lucky

(1) Thank | Hlinsmann