When responding to reviewers' comments, all questions must be answered one by one, without omission; try to meet the experimental additions requested in the comments, and if unable to do so, provide reasonable explanations; the literature recommended by the reviewers must be cited and discussed thoroughly; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to double-check the areas corrected in the initial draft.
Agree with the editor's suggested modifications when responding to the journal editor's comments. If you disagree, write down your reasons directly below the comment, and then provide feedback to the editor. If there are conflicting opinions, negotiate further

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If conditions permit, please try to supplement the experiment as much as possible. If not, seriously consider providing reasons for defense, but a humble and cautious tone is essential. After all, major revisions also have a certain rejection rate

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the difference between responding to reviewer comments and responding to editor comments?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

The reviewer asked me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples have run out / the experiment has concluded. Will my paper be rejected if I simply state that my samples have run out?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

A relatively good journal in zoology, our boss wants to send me this year.

(0) Thank | Barton

In the field of zoology, it is a relatively good journal. Our boss wants me to submit an article to it this year

(0) Thank | Horace Mike

We can only hope for next year. After all, as long as the overall trend is rising, there is no need to worry. Even if it only increases a little bit each year, it will accumulate over time, which is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁