This journal is not good. The processing efficiency is so low: a paper often stays in the “editor assigned” status for one month, and then gets rejected for the following reason: “Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented.” Funny thing is that I recently submitted three articles to the journal, all of which were directly rejected with the above reason, but these manuscripts were later published in journals that are ranked much higher than this one. I don't know if this is because the journal doesn't want manuscripts from Chinese authors.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The speed is very slow. After submitting the manuscript for one week, the result is reviewed. The result is two and a half months before the review is finished. As a reviewer, the reviewer said that my content is not innovative enough.Finally, the editor gave the evidence, and the reviewer was too pitted. The article was in his hands for more than two months. The final review comments were a few words, and then the evidence was given. It was delayed for so long and missed a lot.In fact, it is quite wronged.

(5) Thank | 天空

This journal is very boring. It is always a sentence "Not acceptable. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented." It is estimated that it has not been edited.At the eye of the law, the probability of hiring should be quite large if there is a chance to submit it for review.

(2) Thank | wjy603@126.com

9月10The reviewer was slower, and he was asked once in November. He received a notice of modification on December 14 and was directly acceptd on January 31 after a modification.

(0) Thank | tianjiao860528@163.com

In mid-month, the operator was assigned to the under review. On December 20th, the external review opinion was returned. The modification was changed for ten days. After returning the revised opinion, the editor was assigned for ten days. Accepted in mid-January, checkNot exactly four months...

(2) Thank | 1227156535@qq.com

Really unhappy!!!Submitted on December 13th, maintained 10 days of editor assgined,An email was sent in the middle, but no one responded.On December 23, it became editor invited.The status has not changed since then..

(0) Thank | Shena

is not imaginary, the review efficiency is relatively low, 11.26 submission to 12.12 has been in the editor assigned state

(1) Thank | m13258392158@163.com

editor is very responsible, the system status update is particularly fast!One month after the submission, the editorial department sent an e-mail to recommend more reviewers, and responded on the same day. After one and a half months, the initial review comments came back, minor repairs, and received 15 days after the repair.

(1) Thank | zhou66ha2@163.com

Recommended and acceptd!This is a very responsible journal, the editor respects the author's opinion, and the status change notice is timely.After the first draft was submitted for one and a half months, the overhaul was notified. After the revision, the manuscript was resubmitted and waited for ten days to notify Accept.

(0) Thank | CUGBMAN

Edit very serious SCI journals unfortunately the impact factor is not high now the old SCI factor is not even those SCIE high

(4) Thank | hh

They are all free and true conscience journals

(3) Thank | ff

The requirements for innovation are not low, the requirements are quite high, and the final revision is made after many revisions. 2 reviewers review the manuscript

(0) Thank | ff

The review speed is very fast, it feels easier!

(3) Thank | maoge

Submitted for two months, an expert opinion,Minor repair, has been modified to return, waiting for the results.....

(1) Thank | liyun19850816@163.com

is a photocatalytic degradation dye of graphene oxide composite nano-titanium dioxide. The innovation is generally, mainly to make things clear. After half a month, I did not find a reviewer, and asked to continue to recommendThe reviewer casually filled in a few good relationships, and the results were really found. Then he had to repair it in half a month. After the minor repair, he received it directly in the week, and then he saw it in the second half of the month. In general, the editor was very good.Luck is also good

(1) Thank | ~~~

is rejected less than two months.I found a reviewer and reviewed it for 1 month.What I did was the direction of environmental chemistry. The reviewer who was looking for it was actually microbial toxicology.The result is a lot of questions such as how the chemical unit should be written and some of the spelling mistakes. ```The actual chemical unit is written. I have been writing this way and I have never been told that there is a problem.In the end, I refused to use `` because I have the habit of putting a series of pictures in a total large picture` so I will appear to be less```Ok``funny

(0) Thank | SH0326

As the legendary review is faster, but only one reviewer’s review request does not feel so easy to be legendary anyway, I was rejected, and the requirements for innovation are not so loose, I am doingSomeone did it a few decades ago...But compared to the Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, it's relatively easy. I didn't even have to submit the review.

(1) Thank | zick079@163.com

Put out and enter the review state one month later, and give it a major repair after one and a half months.It is about three and a half months of the words that can be published before and after.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I regret not seeing it...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review time is very long, and the two revisions have been made in the middle. The review comments are constructive and finally accepted.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented. Information is of local interest only.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Not acceptable. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented.Information is of local interest only. It seems to be an excuse for rejecting the manuscript.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented tragedy.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented. Garbage publication

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I also encountered the same situation, no longer in the futureCast it

(0) Thank | Anonymous