My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

WASTE MANAGEMENT

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[WASTE MANAGEMENT]Hello, you are Visitor Number 74845 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWASTE MANAGEMENT
Journal Title AbbreviationsWASTE MANAGE
ISSN0956-053X
E-ISSN1879-2456
h-index127
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
9.601.6342.106
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q18 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.70%
Official Websitehttp://http://www.wm.com/index.jsp
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/wm/default.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1989
Annual Article Volume564
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0956-053X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 7.5 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 66%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 11.3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WASTE MANAGEMENT】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on WASTE MANAGEMENT: Write a review
Author: S3709


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-26 16:52:03
20180203-Submitted to Journal/sent back to author20180204-with editor20180205-editor invited/with editor20180206-under review20180329-Under Editor Evaluation20180330-significant revision20180521-Revision Submitted to Journal20180522-Under Review20180616-Accept. The overall efficiency is high, the review time is about 1 month (I have a reviewer who did not return their comments for a long time, and that why the review was from February 6  to March 29.

(2) Thank | S3709

Author: Mr.c


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-16 12:40:41
2018.10.28 Submitted2018.10.30 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.09 under review2018.11.11 under review2018.11.12 under review2018.11.12 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.16 under review2018.11.27 with editor2018.11.28 with editor2018.12.02 with editor2018.12.03 with editor2018.12.04 major revison2019.01.13 submitted2019.01.15 accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Mr.c

Author: 张军强


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-19 09:12:11
7.26 submit9.28significant revision10.22submit revision11.12minor revision (that is, a figure)11.18accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 张军强

Author: 123zy


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-19 10:36:30
The time of rejection is really long and drunk.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 123zy

Author: 3275


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 15:42:32
One day is rejected, saying that it does not meet the scope of the journal., 干干脆脆
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 3275

Author: ht1104705720qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-25 10:46:29
Journal processing manuscript is highly efficient, editing professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ht1104705720qq.com

Author: yuantian3873@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-26 21:32:02
Received 6 April 2017Overhaul twice in the middleRevised 18 September 2017Accepted 19 September 2017Available online 10 October 2017Published in DecemberImpressions for editors are better. As long as the article has innovations, it feels that it will not be rejected due to language problems, and it will generally give you a chance to overhaul.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yuantian3873@163.com

Author: o(∩_∩)o 哈哈


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-28 19:24:51
Nov 13 2017: Initial Date SubmittedNov 16 2017:with editorNov 27 2017: rejectOk, I said that I didn’t agree with the scope, but fortunately I didn’t delay too much time, and I changed one.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

Author: Z


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-11 22:25:00
The three reviewers in the first trial had differences, and they found two reviewers, which slowed down the speed of review, but explained that the attitude was relatively strict.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Z

Author: HeHe


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-20 15:29:22
After two months of submitteding, I directly told me that the subject does not meet the rejection... Two months... served.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | HeHe

Author: 12345


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-18 09:00:45
Three and a half months without review, and then directly rejected, the middle of the Cui draft once, I feel that some old editors are too slow, processing editor Hans Albert van der Sloot
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 12345

Author: jianwang4455@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-10 16:50:26
submitted in December 2016, and will be returned in April 2017, received on May 10, 2017.It lasted for a long time, but it was finally received.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jianwang4455@126.com

Author: 江湖小生


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-05 15:20:44
Real-time impact factor: 3.905.It is not low in the environment or engineering category.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 江湖小生

Author: 江湖小生


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-26 11:19:03
This journal is biased towards the disposal of solid waste. The editor is very responsible. If the submission is not rejected, there will be a great chance.After submitting the manuscript for 2 months, I gave my review comments. The two reviewers gave a 20-day revision time and asked me to add some research methods.After returning, it is accepted after one month notice.It took a total of four months before and after, not too long.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 江湖小生

Author: yushengrong@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-26 11:18:25
This journal is biased towards solid waste disposal, editVery responsible, if the submission is not rejected, there is a big chance.After submitting the manuscript for 2 months, I gave my review comments. The two reviewers gave a 20-day revision time and asked me to add some research methods.After returning, it is accepted after one month notice.It took a total of four months before and after, not too long.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yushengrong@163.com

Author: 飘絮人间


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-12 19:07:22
This journal is an authoritative journal for the environment and waste management. The quality of the articles in it is obvious to everyone.The number of manuscripts per year is nearly 4,000, while the number of publications is about 400, and the rejection rate should be around 80% to 90%.Recently, I have submitted a paper on the impact of landfills on the surrounding environment. The review period is two months. The previous period with the editor is slow, and the review process is very fast.The journal currently has at least three reviewers, a more rigorous journal in the Environment and Waste Management journal, three reviewers, two minor revisions, and a final deputy editor who also participated in the review. A total of four reviewersThe opinion finally gave twenty days of overhaul.The paper was carefully revised, and the opinions of the four reviewers were replied one by one. After two days, the paper was received and proof was taken three days later.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 飘絮人间

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-27 19:57:14
The difficulty is lower than RCR, mainly the direction of construction waste resources, and the reviewer's recommendation can be properly grasped.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-17 19:52:00
Editing is very responsible.Personally feel that from the perspective of academic rigorous responsibility, it is stronger than hazardous materials.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-15 10:51:00
submitted for two months, still under review, will graduate soon, anxious ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-04 00:51:00
Contribution: 2013/2/20 Reply: 2013/The 9/2 select was a review, which was drafted on August 22, because it was just half a year, and soon I received the result, which was unfortunately rejected.Two reviewers, I wonder if it is because the third reviewer has not given the results, so there are only two.The views of the two reviewers are quite the opposite. The first one is very good and basically accepted directly. The second one is very critical and directly rejects the draft.The comments of the two reviewers are attached below for your reference.Reviewer #1: The manuscript submitigated the *********. The results are
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-24 10:12:00
The existing journal homepage URL is wrong and should be: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/waste-management/#description
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-11 10:37:00
submitted out in April, now in mid-October, there is no result, I believe everyone sees me like thisDu Shuxin
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-04 00:36:00
has been going out for a month now, but it is still under review. I saw that my predecessors have encountered it several times, so it is also peaceful, huh, huh.Hope to be in!==============================================================================The editor directly refused, and the editor was a half-month, and even the opportunity for the under review was not given.Do not understand ~~~ Is my theme biased?It is very consistent with ah~~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-17 23:38:00
This submission rate is unbelievable, and it is rejected after one month of submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-08 17:29:00
Journal homepage: http://www.Journals.elsevier.com/waste-management/#description Latest rating: 2.4
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [WASTE MANAGEMENT]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service