ULTRASONICS

Received at editorial office, 28 Apr 2020; Article revised, 9 Aug 2020; Article accepted for publication, 16 Sep 2020. The number of articles published in this journal is small, but the quality of the articles is very good. Minor revision was required by the reviewers, and it was directly accepted after revision. Although it was a minor revision, the problems were very detailed and pertinent, which showed that the reviewers were very serious.

(0) Thank | zsbsuper

Everything was in line with the review speed displayed on the official website, and the comments raised by the invited reviewers were also very pertinent. It was accepted after major revision and minor revision. * Submitted: 2020-02-24; * Under review: 2020-03-09; * Revision (major): 2020-04-14; * Revision submitted: 2020-05-09; * With editor: 2020-05-15; * Under review: 2020-05-15; * Revision (minor): 2020-06-15; * Revision submitted: 2020-06-24; * With editor: 2020-06-26; * Accept: 2020-06-26.

(2) Thank | fyzgxy

I researched in the field of non-destructive testing. The work is mainly about theory and simulation, with no experiment. Two reviewers required one major revision and one minor revision, respectively, and it was finally accepted. The reviewer who required a major revision gave very sharp opinions, but we also gave a good rebuttal, and he finally accepted our idea. In general, this article has had twists and turns. From the beginning to the acceptance, it took a year before and after.

(11) Thank | Mr. Sun

A long-standing journal in the field of ultrasound, takes both theoretical and application studies. Relative to other journals publishing theoretical studies, this one is slightly more towards application. The impact factor is above 2 now, better than the past few years. Not as difficult as IEEE UFFC or JASA. My submission timeline: 2013-02-20, Submitted to Ultrasonics; 2013-06-24, Received comments for minor revision; 2013-07-09, Resubmitted; 2013-07-09, Accepted

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The reviewer is very professional, the question is very sharp, that is, the first trial cycle is a bit long, a reviewer only gives 4 monthsReply

(1) Thank | ARC-ultrasonic

Editors and reviewers are responsible and efficient.

(0) Thank | g4idrijs

JCR Acoustics Zone 1, the main research material acoustic characteristics related researchSoon after the reviewer was found, about 4 months

(0) Thank | sky

#

(0) Thank | 溪溪

Editing is not selected, first-month, four-month, two-month, two-month, no reminder, no movement
 Can recommend reviewer

(0) Thank | aaaaaaaa

review is very fast, editors and reviewers are very responsible.After reviewing the review comments one month later, although rejected, one of the reviewers gave a ten-page review opinion, which is very helpful~

(0) Thank | aaaaa

two reviewers, the results of the first month of the trial, overhaul, more opinions are more specific; the second trial is another month, small change, two days laterreceive.From submission to receipt for a total of three months time

(3) Thank | 土拔鼠

If the content does not meet the scope, will soon reject the draft.This is better.After 3 months of external trial, I will raise English questions and amend opinions after returning.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1 monthGive review comments, two reviewers.They are quite pertinent.Return comments received after 2 months.The current journal if is 2.083, which has an upward trend.Submission is moderately difficult and should be difficult later.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have selectd for an article, from submission to employment for 10 months, not too fast.Two reviewers, one of them made a lot of comments, and after two trials, they also experienced more than two months.The impact factor of the publication in acoustics is relatively high, and has reached 1.8.I feel that this publication has a good momentum of development. Recently I heard from several colleagues that it has become more difficult to contribute.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Waiting for a long time, select for 5 months to reply to the revision.However, the appointment will be notified one day after the modification.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Editing is very powerful, the speed is also very fast, the article worthy of submitment in ultrasonic nondestructive testing

(2) Thank | Anonymous

was quickly rejected after submission, indicating that they did not meet them.The main purpose of the journal, the efficiency of the editor is quite high, and it was rejected when it was not used for an hour.Although rejected, at least I think the other party is very efficient.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Personal feeling is very fast, one month. Two reviewers. If the reviewer can't review the manuscript, he will find the reviewer again. But the reviewer only gives one month's review.time.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /525452/description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing speed is fast!!!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous