My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
LetPub Free Webinar
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 31474 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleTHEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsTHEOR APPL CLIMATOL
ISSN0177-798X
E-ISSN1434-4483
h-index82
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.300.9661.250
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Atmospheric Science
Q240 / 115

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)14.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/meteorology+&+climatology/journal/704
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/taac/
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER WIEN, SACHSENPLATZ 4-6, PO BOX 89, WIEN, AUSTRIA, A-1201
Subject AreaGeoscience
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1986
Annual Article Volume573
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0177-798X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY: Write a review
Author: nihaohucheng@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-01 00:06:08
The article was submitted in mid-June 2015, and ‘under review’ was displayed in mid-July. Then there was no news for nearly 6 months. At the end of January, the editorial comments were returned. The editor was very pleasant and explained the delay. The reason was that several reviewers they were looking for all said that they could not do the review. The final opinion asked for a minor revision. I changed it the next day, sent it back, and then waited 1 month. It was accepted in early March. This is my first paper and first SCI. I was happy. But the review time lasted for half a year.

(4) Thank | nihaohucheng@163.com

Author: jerryrat


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-14 15:06:10
Submitted in January 2018, the first trial speed is a bit slow, probably usedAfter 7 months, I was urged once and returned to the reviewer's opinion, which required major repairs.It took me three months to make changes, and the reviewer said that I needed to polish the language and found LetPub, which probably took another month.Because the modification time that was given at the beginning was 3 months, I also applied for an extension of one month.After returning to the revised draft in early December 2018, it will be notified directly for about one week. The overall situation is still smooth, and thanks to the excellent service provided by LetPub.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | jerryrat

Author: 王北风


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-03 21:07:14
This is my first English-language paper. After a major overhaul and two minor repairs, the overall submission is still smooth.With editor for three months, the time is longer, and then for three consecutive days to send a letter to the editor in charge of the trial, the fourth day for review.Under review After more than 20 days, the overhaul comments returned. After two minor repairs, they were accepted smoothly. The reviewers are experts in the field and the opinions are very professional.The editor-in-chief is very timely.Very good submission experience.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 王北风

Author: cindy yue


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-24 14:37:45
2017 September 14th contributionAfter undergoing a major overhaul, a minor repair, and then received, the editor is very good, the efficiency is also very high, that is, the under review time is a bit long, from submission to get the review comments for more than three months, the middle of the mail reminderOnce, then return to a reviewer's opinion, after the overhaul, the editor gave a small repair opinion.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | cindy yue

Author: HWCL


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-22 17:45:21
submitted to the recruitment for a total of one year and four months, the main reason is that one applied for two extensions.There are too many things, and the second is that the review has been reviewed for six months, and it is speechless.The editor is quite good, every time I agree, and I am very enthusiastic about pointing out a lot of grammar mistakes.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | HWCL

Author: climate


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-07 10:11:31
Before watching the online review, the review period was very slow, and the trepidation was sent. The first trial was very fast. The result of one month was a minor repair and overhaul. The overhaul was more troublesome.month.The results of the second trial for more than 20 days, the serious reply of the first trial may have touched the reviewers, and the two reviewers agreed that minor revisions were accepted.The review is very fast, gained experience, can be repaired slowly but must be of high quality ~ rookie experience everyone 勉
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | climate

Author: airmass


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-05 09:57:15
I have been with the editor for the past 3 months. I wrote a letter in the middle without reply, and wrote a retreat after 3 months.Manuscript letter, no reply.After 1 week, I wrote a letter and reiterated that I didn't want to retract the manuscript. I want to see the next step!The three emails finally responded, sent for review, and soon there was a result, overhaul.In the middle of the New Year, the 30th is still being revised, but the feeling is worth it, the result is very good, and finally received it~The impact factor is not bad, but it is not super-average, the average impact factor of meteorology is 2.7~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | airmass

Author: xuyu906@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-03 08:35:33
This is my first English paper. After a major overhaul and a minor repair, the overall submission is still smooth. If it is not for personal reasons, it should be faster.Now that TAAC's impact factor has reached 2.4, it should continue to rise.The reviewers are more rigorous and have put forward many targeted opinions and suggestions.The specific submission process is as follows:2016.1.28 Submission;2016.1.29 With Editor;2016.4.4 Under Review;2016.5.6 Revise;2016.6.27 Revion Submitted to Journal;2016.6.28 With Editor;2016.7.3 Under Review;2016.7.14 Revise;2016.8.29 April Submitted to Journal;2016.8.31 With Editor;2016.9.2 Accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | xuyu906@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-11 17:55:00
The review was slow and rejected.And it was very hard hit.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-26 21:29:00
There are some articles in this journal that are very quick to review, but my article is very slow. I received a total of 12 months from the time of the select, and I went through a major overhaul and three minor repairs.The review of the journal is quite strict, the editor is particularly serious, and it needs to be taken seriously when submitting the manuscript.Although the journal impact factor is not particularly high, it is well recognized in the industry and is generally a good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-07 22:18:00
is very fast, at least in the process of editing, and if the time is too late (such as four months), even if there is only one external trial, the editor will act as another reviewer.Look, and then reply as soon as possible, the editor is very good, I feel that the probability of submitteding is relatively large, the third one to receive three months
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-23 19:46:00
Journal homepage URL: http://www.springer.Com/earth+sc ... atology/journal/704
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: climate
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-09 17:01:00
Others are not very clear, I also want to know,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service