Traditional organic chemistry mid-range journal. The impact factor has declined year after year.T, TL, Synlett, Synthesis are almost all the same. There are many good journals now. If you can’t select between OL, JOC, ASC can't select, you can consider other comprehensive journals. There is no need to waste good work on these four journals.

(0) Thank | 四面体

11.2 with editor the next day under review
11.28 major revision
12.20 with editor modified submission (si was accidentally omitted in between)
12.22 or 24 minor revision (requested to supplement and modify grammar in the submission)
12.26 with editor minor revision submission
12.28 accept
1.3 final online

(0) Thank | 我是学术垃圾

Submitted on June 1st,
Reviewed on June 10th,
Revised on June 30th,
Accepted and returned on July 30th,
Officially received on August 1st,
This well-established journal of organic chemistry does not have particularly high novelty requirements, but it is a good choice for a complete and well-presented workload. The speed of review and publication in this journal is really fast, respect!

(2) Thank | 锦珞晴

Traditional organic chemistry mid-range journal.But now it has become a chicken.The impact factor has declined year after year.T, TL, Synlett, Synthesis are almost always the same.There is really no value in the future.There are many good journals now.To be organic, to jump out of the traditional frame, OL, JOC, ASC can not select, you can consider other summative journals,There is no need to waste good work on these four journals

(0) Thank | 四面体

Editors and reviewers are very serious, repaired twice acceptd

(3) Thank | 涛哥

The review speed is relatively fast, the reviewer's question is very detailed, and the ECD calculation part personally calculates the check.Personally feel that the structure of the compound must have some novelty, and the work needs to be as systematic as possible.This is an old-fashioned journal of organic chemistry, and the requirements are not low.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

selectd for 2 and a half months, no news yet, anxious...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Waited for two months, no news yet, too slow, too slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

There is no news for more than a month, a bit slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

More than a month or with the editor I don't know if it is normal.Can you remind me?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have an article that has been submitted for 44 days and still with editor, is it a long time.Urgent

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is also OK, mainly to seriously answer the reviewer's questions!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After submitting the manuscript, the third day did not pass the inspection, the change was re-submited, and the review comments were given in two months. The three reviewers gave minor revisions.It takes two months to fill in the data, and the revised draft is received one week later.In general, the reviewers are more formal and the reviewers are more rigorous.Although the impact factor is not too high, it is still a veteran journal, and it is famous.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

was accepted from the submission to the end, about 2 months, because the Chinese New Year holidays, so the time interval is longer, butIn general, about 40 days will give revisions. In general, it is still very fast, as long as the work is done systematically.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing speed is OK, 3 reviewers finished in January 10 days

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I selectd for green organic chemistry, focusing on methodLearning, do the comparison system

(0) Thank | Anonymous

We are doing organic electronics, the general synthesis class first submitted OL, after being rejected, submitted tetrahedron.In general, it is still relatively easy.The review time is from one month to one and a half months. It must be systematic, but the requirements for novelty are not high.Structural characterization is more demanding, such as Rf, melting point, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, EI-MS, elemental analysis are all required.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is submiting in OL, CC is rejected, and submitted one in T; for organic synthesis, generally after the second district is rejected, it is changed to T; in general, it is required to compare the system, of course, there must beThe novelty is also a must!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

requires a lot of characterization of new compounds, not only nuclear magnetic, high resolution, but also infrared and melting point.Personal experience, as long as there are conditions after the compound is made, all the data will be finished, so that it is not necessary to make up the data.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing the draft for about one month, returning the comments to minor repairs, we have revised the details more carefully.Cast a month later.Accepted soon.The regional editor we selectd for is a Japanese professor of cattle, which is stricter.Old journals have requirements for elemental analysis, but C, HNMR and HRMS can cope.I feel that there are certain requirements for the novelty and systemicity of the work.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Mostly synthetic articles, focusing on new structural compounds, such as symmetry and asymmetry, if the article adds some basic computational simulation content, can increase the novelty of the article.In short, the review will still ask questions on synthetic experiments!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Articles are basically acceptable as long as they are innovative.The speed of reviewing is relatively fast, generally 1 month is good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Tetrahedron, a journal of SD database, most of which are synthetic articles.For those who are engaged in natural medicine, if they want to send T, they are basically compounds with very new structure. Personally, if you can send Tetrahedron, you can definitely send JNP, but the activity requirements are not very high, only the structure.The requirements are high. If it is a general new skeleton, one or two can also be used.

(0) Thank | Anonymous