Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | SPECTROSC LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0038-7010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1532-2289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 10.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00387010.asp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/lstl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Physics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0038-7010%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS: | Write a review |
Author: 天亮说晚安 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-10-29 11:55:12 How to revise the format of this journal? I submitted twice but rejected for the reason of format. I beg you, my friends, for your advice. ![]() ![]() |
Author: nike_tao Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-05-26 09:46:56 I don't know what the format requirements of this journal are. It was rejected 10 days after submission, without telling the specific problems. Then they sent us an attachment and required us to revise according to it. The attachment is not the same as the version on the official website. The main difference is the format of references and abstract. It is very strange; one is 300 words and the other is 100 words. The reference format is also inconsistent. I’m so angry... How should we revise the format? Anxious… Is there anyone who knows can tell me? ![]() ![]() |
Author: cauzl Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-07-01 23:26:07 The journal is very strict with the formatting of the manuscript. It was submitted successfully after three revisions of formatting during the period. After one month, the editorial office’s mail was received. A total of three reviewers: the first one asked to supplement the experiment and made good suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript; the second one raised a few insignificant questions; and the third directly agreed to accept it. The editor gave decision of rejection and resubmission after supplementing the experiment. It then was resubmitted after 55 days, and after 3 and 3 days, it directly showed acceptance. In short, the review speed of the editors and reviewers are really fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 147259@163.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-31 14:54:14 Very long wait. Every time the paper was submitted, it was returned for various reasons. It took me 40 days to submit the paper, followed by a long review, more than three months. Eventually sent an e-mail to ask about the situation. On the third day, I received a rejection. For a four-zone journal with only a few influence factors, if time is tight, this journal is not recommended. ![]() ![]() |
Author: bear Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-27 09:37:28 Friend, how are you doing now? Share your progress with me. ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhouzhou1 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-03-22 09:36:45 Submitted on December 26, 2023, still under review on March 23, 2024 ![]() ![]() |
Author: no paper or 小白 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-07-30 17:35:07 May I ask, what is the current result now? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Akihiiii Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-05-27 13:47:25 Hello, may I ask how long have you been using this With Journal Administrator? I don't understand what's wrong with the image format, so I've been making continuous modifications. ![]() ![]() |
Author: chihiro11 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-10-12 10:40:21 I actually don't understand either, just repeatedly changing the format of the pictures. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LI na Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-09-19 15:41:58 Can I ask about the correct format? I have been making changes as well. ![]() ![]() |
Author: chihiro11 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-09-17 10:51:51 Submitted to the system on July 22nd, 2022. Revised with the editor on September 14th, 2022. Changed the format 5 times during the process. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LI na Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-19 15:23:38 I also have the same problem. It says that the abstract should be 100 words, but the papers I see in the journal are not like that. Also, is there no size requirement for the figures? Should I submit them in a Word document? ![]() ![]() |
Author: LI na Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-19 15:21:31 Hello, how do I modify the format? I feel that the format and requirements that the editor asked me to change do not align well with the guidelines. Can I please ask for some advice? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 兰兰蓝蓝 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-05-14 19:10:47 How to change the format? It keeps saying that my submission is incomplete. ![]() ![]() |
Author: xiafan Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-01-07 16:38:31 Classmate, I want to ask how exactly did you change the journal format? I have already made several changes, but they are still not up to the standard. ![]() ![]() |
Author: MARS Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-08-15 09:50:59 It is not recommended to select for this journal, the impact factor is low, and the editing efficiency is low!Half of the time is spent on format review. A little bit of the problem is returned. It doesn't point out where there is a problem. It only sends you a lengthy format request, and a link to provide a format modification service.Change the format and select for it, wait a week or two, and be returned again because of the format problem.Not returning two or three times is not normal!After the accept, it will sink into the sea.I thought that the letter would be faster, and now I regret to select for this journal! ![]() ![]() |
Author: langyh228@126.com Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-23 10:41:31 During the period, due to the format problem, the submission was successful twice, and the status of the next two weeks was changed to under review, and now threeMonth, it has been this state.In the middle, a manuscript was urged, and the editor said that one of the reviewers was already urging. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-01-25 21:14:33 IJRSReturned and changed.The review speed is fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-08-13 08:16:00 The journals, editors and reviewers with very good spectral directions are very responsible and efficient.The review comments are also very professional, and it is very important to improve your research.From submission to official reception for just one month!Like a ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-26 08:59:00 old-fashioned journal, the journal editors are very efficient and the reviewers are also very professional.After more than 20 days, he returned to the review draft for overhaul. After returning for two weeks, he returned to the second day and retired.呵呵 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-06-17 18:12:00 The journal is very efficient. The first trial is less than one month, and it will be overhauled. It will take a month to modify this article and repair it for a week.I accepted it the next day. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-22 23:10:00 Two weeks after the submission, I will reply. The two reviewers are minor repairs. I changed it to the day and acceptd it. It is really fast, and the editor is very responsible.Magazine in the direction of the spectrum. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-08-10 21:23:00 came back for the first time in 2 weeks. There were two reviewers. After a big change, they returned to the reviewer and then gave it to the reviewer.Two weeks.Minor repairs for a few days, submitted back, accepted on the same day.The speed is still quite fast.Is the journal is very general, anyway, sci, can graduate, Chenghe ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |