APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING

This journal has a relatively slow review period and the submission requirements are extremely strict. If your article is sent out for review, the reviewer’s comments are usually fair yet rigorous, and always professional. The reviewers suggested that we complete additional simulations prior to resubmission for a recent paper we submitted. After completing the new simulations and revising the article, our manuscript was immediately accepted. Based on my experience, I think that the probability of acceptance is much higher if you complete all revisions suggested by the peer reviewers.

(8) Thank | xuxiajnz@163.com

More and more water, messy algorithms are getting more and more, not the bestThe algorithm is better than just an instance.??

(3) Thank | dfafeaaa

2017.10.03 -> With Editor2017.12.17 -> Under Review2018.02.25 -> Major Revise2018.04.04 -> With Editor2018.04.22 -> Under Review2018.06.13 -> Accept With Minor Modification2018.07.12 -> With Editor2018.08.03 -> Accept

(5) Thank | More026

Three reviewers, the initial period is very slow.Has not been moving.The mail has been urging a bit, and it is OK

(0) Thank | 行者

Overall good journals, distributed to the deputy editor for external review in about two weeks, received comments in nearly 3 months, after 3 rounds of revision, 1Overhaul, 2 minor repairs, minor repairs also require external audit, the process is formal and strict, the deputy editor handles the manuscript very quickly, and the basic return is updated within two days. The revised result is also very fast, and the reviewer level can be regarded as the industry peer.This year, IF has risen a little, in line with the fluctuation range, and the level of the middle of the journal 2 is worth recommending.

(0) Thank | gdsyt

The quality of the journals is quite good. The three reviewers are more rigorous. They have submitted four or five pages of review opinions. After overhauling for a long time, they have added a lot of comparison methods and test examples.The angle is re-validated and the algorithm is finally acceptd, which is not easy...

(4) Thank | 优化之路

Irrigation journal, reputation is not good

(4) Thank | 哇哈哈

Submitted in early April last year, accepted in August this year.Major modification, minor modification, major modification, accept, etc.Each round of more than 3 reviewers, each new round of new reviewers, strict and abnormal.

(1) Thank | mutual

is suitable for Chinese submission!Very general!

(21) Thank | dd

Reviewers and editors are very careful, my deputy editor of this article is Ivanoe De Falco, personvery good.

(1) Thank | 伽蓝寺

submitted in early October last year, under review on October 26
                                     March 13 major modification
                                    April 26 under review
                                    May 31 minor modification
                                   June 13 acceptThis speed is basically normal for this journal.

(4) Thank | 案发胡

The review time is too long.I am almost 24 months old.Don't select for everyone.

(1) Thank | boxu59678

said at the beginning that this journal is not good,The requirements are very strict and not afraid to select.After giving the select, the feeling is that the journal is fair and rigorous, and the reviewers are also very professional.Three months after the first trial, I came back to overhaul, mainly because the simulation was not enough. I added a lot of simulations and revised them one by one according to the reviewer's requirements. The second trial was directly acceptd.My thesis is about particle swarm optimization. The test function that I just started with simulation is relatively small and relatively simple. It is recommended that you use the most comprehensive and comprehensive test functions for simulation when doing this research. The test function on CEC2010 can be used.This can improve the employment rate of papers.The experience is to be revised in strict accordance with the requirements of the reviewer, and the problems in the paper are taken seriously.

(0) Thank | xuxiajnz@163.com

20051031Submission, May 31, 2008 revision notice, 2009 published

(4) Thank | 键盘

Do you want to review the draft fee and the layout fee?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Review for 8 months or so, this time there are 5 reviewers, very abnormal!!!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The influence factor is quite high, I don’t know if it’s difficult

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has two articles, the first one is faster, the second one is from the submitment to the modification.19 months.The speed is slower, but the reviewer is still quite responsible.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The article seems to be more general, but the IF is higher, and domestic scholars have published a lot of texts.It seems that there are not many direct reports (the article is not too bad), that is, people are constantly changing, the cycle is generally not short!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Seriously agree with the above comments,I selectd for 1 article, 1 year and 2 months for the first trial, 8 months for the review, and 23 months from the submitment.Please be careful when submitting!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewer is really not easy Haha

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I feel that the review is quite fast, my first trial and second trial are all done in a month.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Don't select, the review is slow and slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Cycle is too long, it is recommended not to consider

(0) Thank | Anonymous