Among the top mathematics journals, the theory depth of Applied Mathematical Modelling is average, but it is definitely difficult to be published in it. The period is relatively long, and many people scold Applied Mathematical Modelling for the rejection after a long delay of their articles. The review process is very fair and just, and the difficulty is relatively high, and the overall acceptance rate is less than 15%. If major revision was required, the review comments will often make you doubt your life; they even look at the references you cited. The associate editor will also ask many difficult questions, and sometimes he is more difficult to deal with than the reviewers. The time of with editor and decision in process is usually longer than that of under review. It is worth noting that the editor-in-chief often makes decision on Wednesday night (Beijing time).

(78) Thank | 天龙九部

It was directly rejected by the editor after “with editor” for 35 days. Then it was transferred to Aerospace Science and Technology (AST). It lasted for less than three months from review to acceptance. At least from this point of view, AMM is quite good. Of course, some people may say that your manuscript is suitable for AST, but not suitable for AMM. No matter what, AST is still one of the best journals in the aerospace field. I don't know why some people belittle it. I submitted papers to AMM for 6 times, only one was accepted. AMM has a lot of haters. I think it's nothing but grape sours!!!

(12) Thank | SSSS

Personally, I think that AMM is a math-based journal that publishes low-quality research. The amount of sub-par research published recently has lowered the impact of this journal.

(1) Thank | 几何人生

May I ask about the current status of your manuscript?

(0) Thank | 留白的留白year

Hello, do you have the results now?

(0) Thank | 逢投必中

Hello, what does DIp mean directly after we?

(0) Thank | 逢投必中

Hello, do you have any results?

(0) Thank | 逢投必中

I just want to ask, my submission was changed from "one week with editor" to "DIP," does that mean it was rejected?

(0) Thank | 逢投必中

One month, 0 people agree.

(0) Thank | 听雨

How long have you been?

(0) Thank | 逢投必中

What do people usually do when no one agrees to review the manuscript for a long time?

(0) Thank | 听雨

Have you got the results?

(0) Thank | ArryYao

Still with Editor.

(0) Thank | ArryYao

I also turned into dip directly, is it cold now?

(0) Thank | 想中AIR！

May I ask what happened after we turned back to "we"? I got dipped right after we turned back to "we", am I going to be kicked out?

(0) Thank | 想中AIR！

With Editor→Decision in Process→With Editor

What does it mean when it says "With Editor"? Has anyone encountered this before?

(0) Thank | ArryYao

Do we need a template for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 旧城

Do we need a template for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 旧城

May I ask how things are going with my submission on March 8th? It was updated with an editor on March 10th, but it is still in progress.

(0) Thank | budingfan

This journal used to be quite well recognized.

(0) Thank | ie

This year's Chinese Academy of Sciences is a bit out of line, many old-school TOP journals are no longer considered TOP.

(0) Thank | WayneTT

Not at the top anymore.

(0) Thank | aabbccdd@

I also want to know if there are any more tops.

(0) Thank | xhd

Is this journal still in the top 2 quartile?

(0) Thank | ie

Are you out yet, new district?

(0) Thank | 浩气