Among the top mathematics journals, the theory depth of Applied Mathematical Modelling is average, but it is definitely difficult to be published in it. The period is relatively long, and many people scold Applied Mathematical Modelling for the rejection after a long delay of their articles. The review process is very fair and just, and the difficulty is relatively high, and the overall acceptance rate is less than 15%. If major revision was required, the review comments will often make you doubt your life; they even look at the references you cited. The associate editor will also ask many difficult questions, and sometimes he is more difficult to deal with than the reviewers. The time of with editor and decision in process is usually longer than that of under review. It is worth noting that the editor-in-chief often makes decision on Wednesday night (Beijing time).

(78) Thank | 天龙九部

It was directly rejected by the editor after “with editor” for 35 days. Then it was transferred to Aerospace Science and Technology (AST). It lasted for less than three months from review to acceptance. At least from this point of view, AMM is quite good. Of course, some people may say that your manuscript is suitable for AST, but not suitable for AMM. No matter what, AST is still one of the best journals in the aerospace field. I don't know why some people belittle it. I submitted papers to AMM for 6 times, only one was accepted. AMM has a lot of haters. I think it's nothing but grape sours!!!

(12) Thank | SSSS

Personally, I think that AMM is a math-based journal that publishes low-quality research. The amount of sub-par research published recently has lowered the impact of this journal.

(1) Thank | 几何人生

Sent to 4 reviewers, all accepted, currently 3 have returned their reviews, still no decision, continuing under review. Starting from the second review returned, it will be directly informed that the review meets the minimum requirements, then it will go back to under review. The same process for the third review. Does this mean we have to wait for all 4 reviews to make a decision??

(0) Thank | corage

Every decision involves a DIP, a minor repair that doesn't count as a weekend, which took 5 days.

(0) Thank | 集美钓鱼王

What happened afterwards?

(0) Thank | huanxi2589

After submitting the manuscript, the status changed to "With Editor", and then came the long wait. A week passed with no change in status, so I tried to communicate with Elsevier's customer service. I was informed that I did not have the authority to inquire about the status of the article. I politely explained that I was not trying to rush the editor, just wanted to know the status of the article. The customer service representative did not give a direct response, only saying that they would forward my request to the relevant personnel. The next day, I received 8 identical emails from the journal's manager, stating that the article was currently with the editor. It was clear that I had irritated them with my inquiries. I found it strange that simply asking about the status of the article would elicit such a strong reaction. Therefore, this journal is slow in their process, and those who are eager for results should be cautious when submitting their work.

(0) Thank | abcdefghijk

How many days will it take for the minor repair of the dip?

(0) Thank | huanxi2589

How many days until Xiao Xiuxiu returns to pick up the item?

(0) Thank | huanxi2589

Is there a dip process in the first trial? If so, how long does it take?

(0) Thank | HB666

Celebrate my first article in Area 2. The direction is relatively niche, with only 3 people receiving feedback after 4 months of review, and only 1 person providing comments. The editor didn't wait and immediately gave a major revision based on this person's feedback. The editor was very meticulous and provided many suggestions, which improved the quality of the article. After 2 days of minor revisions, the article was resubmitted. It took 4 days for the revised article to be accepted, and the whole process from submission to acceptance took half a year. Make sure to respond well to the associate editor's feedback!!!

(0) Thank | 集美钓鱼王

Please accept the following paragraph.

(0) Thank | 一只爱学习的汪汪

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 接收

(0) Thank | 一只爱学习的汪汪

I used the single-column template from the official website when submitting my article, but it was requested to be changed to a double-column format during the revision process.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a translation without knowing the text you would like me to translate.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

Is there a limit on the word count, number of pages, and number of figures for submitting to this journal? Do I need to use a specific template for my paper?

(0) Thank | jun1023

Generally, if there are two reviewers, feedback will be provided. However, the associate editor and formatting editor will also serve as reviewers, making a total of three. It is crucial to address the associate editor's comments properly, as this will expedite the acceptance of your paper and prevent multiple revisions.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

Today I dipped, it's been two months, and I panicked when I saw your comment.

(0) Thank | 仓鼠飞轮

How many reviewers need to be collected before revisions can be made? One reviewer has completed the review, but the others have not responded. An email was sent to the editor to re-invite the reviewers, but it has been almost a month and they still have not been re-invited.

(0) Thank | xiebro

Please provide the reviewers with 21 days.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

First trial takes three months, second trial takes 45 days.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

If you have any questions during the submission process, feel free to consult me.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

A very good journal with a particularly fast review speed. Submitted on the same day, sent for external review by the editor on the same day, without any delays. Especially worth mentioning is that the editor-in-chief and deputy editor are very careful with the articles, reviewing them very seriously. I hope everyone has a smooth experience when submitting to this journal, and I hope the journal continues to improve and reach new heights.

(0) Thank | 叫小白

Two months later, two reviewers suggested major revisions, but the editor rejected them outright.

(0) Thank | scifa

Excuse me, what's the situation behind? Have you found the reviewer? I also can't find the reviewer now.

(0) Thank | jjj521