PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS

Overall, the speed is OK. The review period is a bit long than two months. I don't know if it is because of the summer vacation, but the editing process is very fast. Fortunately, the opinions of the two reviewers were very positive. One agreed to receive it directly, and the other agreed to accept it but I had to modify the grammar without any questions. The editor said  Revise, please return after ten days of modification, and received it directly after one week. The speed of the POC editing process is still very fast. After receiving it, it is sent directly to the publishing house, and the publishing house immediately issued a copyright agreement. After reading the latest issues, POC's publication speed is OK, I feel.

(0) Thank | 1123403234@qq.com

Submitted on August 3, 2018;Overhaul on December 19, 2018, a dozen questions, most of which are good answers;On January 28, 2019, minor repairs, three questions, mainly in the overhaul did not answer well.Among them, the editor was changed.On February 4, 2019, the pair was 30 years old, receiving, very happy graduate student second SCI.The submission of this article has been received for a long time, and the receiving rate is still OK.I have urged it twice. The editor is very good. I answered me every time, and I didn't reject it. Thank you for editing. Thank you, reviewer.

(0) Thank | 后但是

Submitted on January 26thAt the end of July, I returned to the revision and made a very pertinent review.Submit revised version on October 4thNovember 19th shows acceptanceAfter a week of retouching, I edited the DOI soon.In short, the previous period has been used for a long time, adding up to a total of nearly ten months.The speed of reviewing journals is indeed a bit slow, and I am anxious and cautious.Hope it could help everyone.

(1) Thank | 百叶传说

Although it is slow, it is very easy. As long as the check is heavy, there is no problem. If you are not in a hurry, you can head this journal. It is really easy.

(0) Thank | qq572020211

Very enjoyable submission experience, submitted at the end of August, submitted for review on October 1st, review comments at the end of October, two minor repairs.After the change, it was received very efficiently the next day after uploading.I didn't expect my first English article to be accepted in the first journal. The luck is not too good.Many thanks to Hidetoshi Yamabe for editing.Seeing that many people recommend him to choose him is really very efficient and responsible.

(0) Thank | Charon

has accepted, but I don’t know when it will be drafted.

(0) Thank | 572020211-qq

Submitted at the end of May, edited two weeks later, is the editor of Webster, the reviewer may not be able to find it in the middle, there are three months, then found the reviewer, reviewerThree weeks of minor repairs, after two weeks of reply, and then directly received in two weeks, the editing process is very fast, directly sent to production.Once in the middle, the customer service and editors responded with patience. If you wait too long, you can ask for it.

(0) Thank | liboqian

Today, more than three months, has been with editor.I am sending an email now and I am directly rejected.I will not select again in the future.Everyone tries not to select for this junk journal.I haven't heard from the past 3 months, and I have sent an email consultation in the middle, and no one has responded.Finally, contact the journal customer service, and say that it will help feedback the information.

(0) Thank | 3546afs

Everyone should try not to select for this junk journal.I haven't heard from the past 3 months, and I have sent an email consultation in the middle, and no one has responded.Finally, contact the journal customer service, and say that it will help feedback the information.It has been with editor for more than three months today.I am sending an email now and I am directly rejected.I will not select again in the future.

(0) Thank | 3546afs

This journal is still ok, you have to read the editor, there must be a point,It is this journal to check the weight, but it is very easy, I came to a minor repair in 15 days, it may be luck.

(0) Thank | 572020211qq

3月19日稿Submitted on April 2Received on May 2Direct reception, the speed is too fast.

(0) Thank | yeah1111

has two articles in front and back, one is caught in the language, the other is overhauled, but it is all right.

(0) Thank | er

The first article is more than 7 months, finally received, 10 months before online.The second one was sent back for more than three months and was rejected.In general, this journal is very slow.

(0) Thank | qqq

very irresponsible journal, even the editor of Webster, just dragged the manuscriptI didn’t give it to the trial for 6 months, and then I returned it because I couldn’t find the reviewer. I didn’t even apologize. It’s a wonderful journal.

(1) Thank | Science

editing is dean webster, April submission is still with editor, reminded once said that it is not foundTo the appropriate reviewer. For six months, I am also a bit desperate...

(1) Thank | 银河

3 select on the 8th, return to the revised opinion in August, did not say overhaul or minor repair, anyway, modify, at the end of AugustRevised, and then reviewed for 2 months, then called the amendment, and then received at the beginning of this month, very long.

(0) Thank | eee

The old-fashioned journals in the field of coatings have low impact factors and the reputation of the industry is still good.The review was very strict. The results of one and a half months of the first trial, the two reviewers gave the revision, and the comments were very helpful. After the renovation, they met the summer vacation. About one month later, the reviewer raised several minor questions.After the completion of the submission, the paper will be accepted the next day, from submission to acceptance for three and a half months.

(2) Thank | sbneka

The old-fashioned journals in the field of coatings have low impact factors, and the reputation of the industry is still good.The review was very strict. The results of one and a half months of the first trial, the two reviewers gave the revision, and the comments were very helpful. After the renovation, they met the summer vacation. About one month later, the reviewer raised several minor questions.After the completion of the submission, the paper will be accepted the next day, from submission to acceptance for three and a half months.

(0) Thank | sbneka

Hidetoshi Yamabe Editing speed is not too fastOn February 17th, the day of under reviewOverhaul after 56 daysAfter 15 days, selectSame day with editorDay 3 Return to the comments minor repair, received 10 minutes after the revision...

(0) Thank | mummy

The editor I encountered was Dean webster. People really super NICE. Actually, the review cycle was over. It was just a system problem. The article was stuck there for more than 2 months. Later, I sent a reminder letter to Webster.He gave a very patient and detailed explanation and gave the revised comments after one month, modified and uploaded, and accepted directly after one month.The submission process was long, but the editors encountered were very good. The journal had to select.

(1) Thank | 小y

Because the language was rejected

(0) Thank | wangyue901004@163.com

Submitted the paper on December 6, 2014, the results were revised on February 26, 2015, and the revised draft was submitted on April 21, and received on June 1.The speed is still very fast, and the editor is very good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted the paper on December 6, 2014, the results were revised on February 26, 2015, and the revised draft was submitted on April 21, and received on June 1.The speed is still very fast, and the editor is very good.

(0) Thank | changshahqh@126.com

14 submitted in June, returned to minor repair in September, and notified the paper in March.Worried for a long time, finally there is a result.

(0) Thank | 907900014@qq.com

I submitted the manuscript in March of the 13th year and returned to the revision after about three months. The opinions of the two reviewers are very pertinent.One of the reviewers requested to supplement the explanation of the experimental mechanism. It took a long time to read the information and finally complete it.Another reviewer gave more than 20 comments. I have made some changes according to each one. Some have added experiments, some have explained the ambiguous places, in the list.A detailed description of the responses.After the modification, return and read again. After about ten days, receive it directly.The middle lasted about six months, I am very happy, and finally have a good result!

(0) Thank | Anonymous