PLoS One

This journal is quickly growing into a popular choice from scientists in many fields. Warning: the reviewers can be very tough re: the quality of the English writing; if you are an international researcher you better make use of an editing service or you may very quickly receive a desk rejection. The reviewers are very strict and thorough.

(2) Thank | 柯若

People’s Google academic influence is very high. The editors of science all look at his articles. Don’t understand, don’t talk about it, the volume of publication is not the cause of water, and the trouble is submitigated.#

(0) Thank | hugo

The review speed is slow, no reviewers can be found, and two reminders are sent.The three reviewers made a lot of very practical changes, not as watery as others said.Received after half a year.

(0) Thank | 匿名123

There is also an article about Daniel on the above. You have to know that Da Niu has been generally flowering in authoritative journals. Occasionally throwing a piece of rubbish on it does not explain the problem.And you, the mainstream journals can't send, can only spend money on this to buy, to explain your cow?Do you feel the same?

(0) Thank | 垂涎木渎

After identification, the basics of foreign scholars sent to the above are passed.The study, because they want to send which; the Chinese author sent it to this, because there is no place to send it, so it was sent to this, if I graduated and continue to engage in academics, I will not succumb to the boss’s kinky hair.This, although he is willing to give me this money...Listening to many people said that it is an academic stain to publish articles on this or a communication.

(1) Thank | 月色朦胧

There is no reference value for this journal impact factor. Unexpected publications, water journals, and money journals are undoubtedly impossible to speculate..Do you think that a large biological journal 2.7 is very high?Not to mention the so-called research that is not a biological one. It is foolish and foolish...

(1) Thank | uiywqruiwe

It doesn't blow black, where academic speculators look, the first Chinese authors of Plos one are typical representatives...The problem is coming. It must be a lot of people to spray. If you have the ability, you can submit in a professional journal. Anyone can think of the data...Ok, I am one of them..

(1) Thank | uiywqruiwe

Notorious, a thousand miles.Those who want to engage in academics, the papers on this are all self-destructive, sad..I regret it..What is the three districts and four districts, Plos one is a big stinking ditch..

(0) Thank | 屏风秋色

Editors and reviewers are very serious, I have changed 9 times, and the review comments gave seven pages, who said the water

(7) Thank | linna

Is this a water journal???Is there an experienced god to teach?

(3) Thank | perfect77

This is not easy now, the impact factor is relatively high, and the proportion of Chinese is only 24%.

(2) Thank | 卢伟

Although it was in the middle, I felt that it was a journal that was considered to be a lot of water in the country.

(4) Thank | prof

Just write it, it’s boring.

(4) Thank | dinga aoteman

These days, Google’s H-index data was released, and plos one’s influence ranked 23rd or more, even surpassing the super-premium journal Nature Chemistry, which is more than the sci impact factor indicator.Shocked...The large amount of documents can also affect Google's new generation of index system?

(6) Thank | 不服评价指标

Four months after receiving

(0) Thank | 494212953@qq.com

The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly acceptd after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986

(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

decision in progress After 40 days of recruitment

(0) Thank | zhjyq129

minor review After becoming decision in progress 1 month, what is the situation, is not to be rejected

(1) Thank | zhjyq

The famous Big Mac water journal, more than 20,000 articles a year, is a general journal 50-80 yearsArticle volume

(61) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is not bad. I selectd for two articles, one was rejected, one was overhauled, and many opinions were revised. It is very professional and I have improved my document.At the same time, the publication was not long before the paper was cited many times by other journals, which made me feel that the influence of this journal is still good. At least I personally feel more exposed than traditional non-open source journals...I feel more able to show my research results to my colleagues at home and abroad...

(2) Thank | Hu

A manuscript of 俺 was rejected by arXiv and asked to be published in the physical review:Dear xxxxxxxx,Our moderators are not willing to reconsider this decision unless this article is first published. They suggested first publishing in Phys Rev A, and after that has occurred, you could resubmit for reconsideration.-----arXiv moderationCan you select for Plos One?

(0) Thank | tmd1880

This journal does not want the legendary water, it is indeed very fast.Submitted on January 20th, February 21st, minor revision, returned to revision on April 8th, April 29th, accepted.The review comments were very strict and academically strong, giving a full three-page opinion.Every little detail in the paper, editors and reviewers are not overlooked, very strict.But it is not the legendary failure to pay attention to the original innovation, the scientific significance and innovative requirements of the paper is still quite high!Refueling Plos one

(1) Thank | wxling07@163.com

Waited for 5 months, and the school actually did not count the journals. There is no way to retract the papers. When you submit the papers, you must look at the school’s requirements. Is there any?Pull down the school blacklist.The water journal is well mixed, but the school does not necessarily recognize

(21) Thank | 1111

Seeing that there are a lot of retraction notices, what is the situation?

(0) Thank | zhjyq

period modification and modification, it took a year to finally accept

(3) Thank | paper123