Four months after receiving

(0) Thank | 494212953@qq.com

The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly hired after minor repairs.Still very lucky to cast the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986

(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

decision in progress After 40 days of recruitment

(0) Thank | zhjyq129

minor review After becoming decision in progress 1 month, what is the situation, is not to be rejected

(1) Thank | zhjyq

The famous Big Mac water magazine, more than 20,000 articles a year, is a general magazine 50-80 yearsArticle volume

(61) Thank | 匿名

This journal is not bad. I voted for two articles, one was rejected, one was overhauled, and many opinions were revised. It is very professional and I have improved my document.At the same time, the publication was not long before the paper was cited many times by other journals, which made me feel that the influence of this journal is still good. At least I personally feel more exposed than traditional non-open source journals...I feel more able to show my research results to my colleagues at home and abroad...

(2) Thank | Hu

This journal does not want the legendary water, it is indeed very fast.Submitted on January 20th, February 21st, minor revision, returned to revision on April 8th, April 29th, accepted.The review comments were very strict and academically strong, giving a full three-page opinion.Every little detail in the paper, editors and reviewers are not overlooked, very strict.But it is not the legendary failure to pay attention to the original innovation, the scientific significance and innovative requirements of the paper is still quite high!Refueling Plos one

(0) Thank | wxling07@163.com

Waited for 5 months, and the school actually did not count the journals. There is no way to retract the papers. When you submit the papers, you must look at the school’s requirements. Is there any?Pull down the school blacklist.The water magazine is well mixed, but the school does not necessarily recognize

(21) Thank | 1111

Seeing that there are a lot of retraction notices, what is the situation?

(0) Thank | zhjyq

period modification and modification, it took a year to finally hire

(3) Thank | paper123

2019, submitted on April 3, the revision of the draft in early May, repaired soon after the revision, and received the acceptance notice on May 17.In general, it is still very smooth. The key is to indicate the recommended reviewers to facilitate the positioning of the magazine.

(0) Thank | rabbitzxy@163.com

Waiting is really a torment, the first trial is not easy to end, I did not expect to come to a second trial, but also in the foreseeable, it has been almost a month.......

(0) Thank | Riven

Waiting is really a torment, it is not easy to get a trial.At the end, I didn't expect to have a second trial. It was still in the foreseeable future. It has been almost a month.......

(0) Thank | Riven

also encountered journal editors inaction, reminded and reminded.Admit that his level is limited, the paper can only be degraded to this journal, but the process is extremely testable, patient experience, experienced a year, six reminders, each reminder.

(1) Thank | 匿名

俺 is almost 4 months old, and today the academic editor told you that 10 invitations for review were declined, no one tried.

(1) Thank | tmdztr

I submitted PLOS ONE on October 30, 17th, and the status update was under review on January 2, 2018. In the middle two months, I said that I was conducting academic quality review and looking for editors, then went to 2018.On April 13th, it is still under review. I sent an e-mail on April 4th to ask what the situation said. The editor said that the academic editor was unavailable, and said that once an academic editor is available, the review comments will be sent back.Give it to me, because without academic editors, because of confidentiality issues, you can't directly return to the reviewed opinions.

(1) Thank | pffwfp@163.com

submitted for more than one month to enter the external audit, the external audit has been three months, and the e-mail editor has not yet found the external auditor, in a pseudo-external state.Then I received an apology letter from the academic editor, hoping to have a good result.

(0) Thank | aaaa

heard that it is one of the four major water issues.The monthly publications are over 1000, which is a bit exaggerated.

(4) Thank | y

is too pitted. After one month, I went into the under review. After two months, I was notified that the academic editor could not use it. I have to find an academic editor again!I haven't sent it out for so long.

(1) Thank | 972639419@qq.com

is normal.It’s only 50 days later, Under Review.

(0) Thank | 4117

would like to ask, submitted for 4 weeks, or editor invited, normal?

(0) Thank | LA

俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations.

(20) Thank | pls8151

俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations.

(0) Thank | pls8151

Submission is simple and smooth, minor repair is on

(1) Thank | Hank