Journal Profile | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | PLoS One | |||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | PLOS ONE | |||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1932-6203 | |||||||||||||||
h-index | 241 | |||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| |||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018) | 6.00% | |||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.plosone.org/home.action | |||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp | |||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | |||||||||||||||
Publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107 | |||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | |||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | |||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Irregular | |||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 20328 | |||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | |||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D | |||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s) | |||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: 88% | |||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| |||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on PLoS One: | Write a review |
Author: 494212953@qq.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-12 14:10:55 Four months after receiving ![]() ![]() |
Author: 707145297@qq.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-11 18:40:20 The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly hired after minor repairs.Still very lucky to cast the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986 ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhjyq129 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-10 09:19:22 decision in progress After 40 days of recruitment ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhjyq Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-20 09:54:59 minor review After becoming decision in progress 1 month, what is the situation, is not to be rejected ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-14 03:04:46 The famous Big Mac water magazine, more than 20,000 articles a year, is a general magazine 50-80 yearsArticle volume ![]() ![]() |
Author: Hu Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-13 14:28:37 This journal is not bad. I voted for two articles, one was rejected, one was overhauled, and many opinions were revised. It is very professional and I have improved my document.At the same time, the publication was not long before the paper was cited many times by other journals, which made me feel that the influence of this journal is still good. At least I personally feel more exposed than traditional non-open source journals...I feel more able to show my research results to my colleagues at home and abroad... ![]() ![]() |
Author: tmd1880 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-03 01:52:08 ![]() ![]() |
Author: wxling07@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-30 06:56:33 This journal does not want the legendary water, it is indeed very fast.Submitted on January 20th, February 21st, minor revision, returned to revision on April 8th, April 29th, accepted.The review comments were very strict and academically strong, giving a full three-page opinion.Every little detail in the paper, editors and reviewers are not overlooked, very strict.But it is not the legendary failure to pay attention to the original innovation, the scientific significance and innovative requirements of the paper is still quite high!Refueling Plos one ![]() ![]() |
Author: 1111 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-29 15:50:38 Waited for 5 months, and the school actually did not count the journals. There is no way to retract the papers. When you submit the papers, you must look at the school’s requirements. Is there any?Pull down the school blacklist.The water magazine is well mixed, but the school does not necessarily recognize ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhjyq Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-21 08:26:00 Seeing that there are a lot of retraction notices, what is the situation? ![]() ![]() |
Author: paper123 Subject Area: Management Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-18 08:47:07 period modification and modification, it took a year to finally hire ![]() ![]() |
Author: rabbitzxy@163.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-17 06:24:32 2019, submitted on April 3, the revision of the draft in early May, repaired soon after the revision, and received the acceptance notice on May 17.In general, it is still very smooth. The key is to indicate the recommended reviewers to facilitate the positioning of the magazine. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Riven Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:29 Waiting is really a torment, the first trial is not easy to end, I did not expect to come to a second trial, but also in the foreseeable, it has been almost a month....... ![]() ![]() |
Author: Riven Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:23 Waiting is really a torment, it is not easy to get a trial.At the end, I didn't expect to have a second trial. It was still in the foreseeable future. It has been almost a month....... ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-14 16:43:28 also encountered journal editors inaction, reminded and reminded.Admit that his level is limited, the paper can only be degraded to this journal, but the process is extremely testable, patient experience, experienced a year, six reminders, each reminder. ![]() ![]() |
Author: tmdztr Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-04-30 11:46:57 俺 is almost 4 months old, and today the academic editor told you that 10 invitations for review were declined, no one tried. ![]() ![]() |
Author: pffwfp@163.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-04-13 08:13:34 I submitted PLOS ONE on October 30, 17th, and the status update was under review on January 2, 2018. In the middle two months, I said that I was conducting academic quality review and looking for editors, then went to 2018.On April 13th, it is still under review. I sent an e-mail on April 4th to ask what the situation said. The editor said that the academic editor was unavailable, and said that once an academic editor is available, the review comments will be sent back.Give it to me, because without academic editors, because of confidentiality issues, you can't directly return to the reviewed opinions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: aaaa Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-04-10 09:15:02 submitted for more than one month to enter the external audit, the external audit has been three months, and the e-mail editor has not yet found the external auditor, in a pseudo-external state.Then I received an apology letter from the academic editor, hoping to have a good result. ![]() ![]() |
Author: y Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-29 16:11:00 heard that it is one of the four major water issues.The monthly publications are over 1000, which is a bit exaggerated. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 972639419@qq.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:54:02 is too pitted. After one month, I went into the under review. After two months, I was notified that the academic editor could not use it. I have to find an academic editor again!I haven't sent it out for so long. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 4117 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:40:46 is normal.It’s only 50 days later, Under Review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LA Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-10 22:45:08 would like to ask, submitted for 4 weeks, or editor invited, normal? ![]() ![]() |
Author: pls8151 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:46:53 俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations. ![]() ![]() |
Author: pls8151 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:45:58 俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Hank Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-23 03:17:39 Submission is simple and smooth, minor repair is on ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page |
Contact us