PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS

I focus on biochemical interface molecular dynamics. I intended publish a paper in the Chinese core journals to graduate casually. But my boss insisted that I submit to a high-level journal, and finally we decided to submit to PCCP. Jan. 14, submission; Jan. 29, first review comments received. One required major revision, and another one required minor revision. I did not reply as it was Spring Festival in China. Then after I got back to school, I spent a month to respond to the comments. Mar. 24, revised submission. Apr. 4, comments received, requiring a minor revision with only one questions. Apr. 5, resubmitted. Then accepted on Apr. 8. This is my only one footprint in academia as a study slacker -.-

(31) Thank | ysl

Thank you very much to my boss for your patient guidance and help me revise the paper! It was firstly submitted to The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, the editor rejected it directly. Boss resubmitted it to Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) (I liked the layout of PCCP very much when I was reading the literature before entering the group. I liked this journal and I didn't expect it can be published on it). It was submitted in December, the comments from editors returned within a month, the first reviewer suggested minor revision, and the second one suggested major revision. The editor decided to ask me to make a revision; I resubmitted it after revising and supplemented an SI. The news of the official acceptance came in less than a month. Thanks again to my boss, for letting me, a stubborn student, whose name can be appeared in SCI. I didn’t expect my first paper can be published on such a good journal.

(5) Thank | Rsndmy

Unfortunately, the impact factor of PCCP is declining. This is the general trend for basic disciplines in recent years. The IFs of journals like JPCB Langmuir JCP are falling year by year. However, this does not affect PCCP's position and influence as the three old-fashioned materialized journals among researchers. In recent years, PCCP has published some top articles in the industry, and I hope that PCCP will be better and better.

(6) Thank | 271426272@qq.com

8.14 in early August.8.21 in peer review.9.5 Receiving.Both reviewers recommend direct reception.2333

(3) Thank | 2333

Received 3rd May 2018 , Accepted 23rd July 2018, PCCP speed is still very fast.

(0) Thank | zp3631@gmail.com

is a simulation study of the performance analysis of two-dimensional material gas sensors, starting two reviewers, and later added one,After the article was revised several times, after feeling seriously changed according to the reviewer's opinion, the quality of the article really rose a grade.Try not to avoid any problems, or you will not pick them up.The speed of reviewing the manuscript, as well as the review draft after the repair, are very fast, and are more optimistic about the journal.

(2) Thank | pangjiu@outlook.com

has submited in Nanoscale and JMCC, and the PCCP, which was submited in 2018.3.7, was overhauled at 2018.4.10, and was acceptd at 2018.4.27, from submission to employment for about 1.5 months.At the time of submission, if it is rejected by RSC's journals, it needs to be notified at the time of submission (RSC's journals seem to have similar requirements, the editor may have a database to check), and the reply and related amendments are handed in.

(1) Thank | PEDOT_in_a_MOF

PCCP Efficiency wife is too slow, very worthwhile.The tendency to receive comparative basis research is mainly based on partial experiments. In recent years, PCCP has published some very exciting theoretical and experimental mechanisms.Previously, the boss of the project team said: If you make high catalytic efficiency, you can submit in JACS or Advanced Materials; if you have the ability and energy to clarify the complex catalytic mechanism, you will submit in PCCP.

(0) Thank | OSUkid

for the first time.Nanscale started to select, four reviewers, two suggested minor repairs, two suggestions to change, the editor recommended to change to PCCP, we immediately transferred to PCCP after replying to the question, reviewed for one month, directly acceptd, still very excitedof.

(0) Thank | 卡卡

Submit (12-Jul-2017) 20 days in the first trial, the speed is good!Reject

(2) Thank | 978257219@qq.com

Submit (12-Jul-2017)20 days in the first trial, the speed is good!Reject

(4) Thank | 978257219@qq.com

is really slow. In mid-July, the manuscript was submitted. In September, the result of re-submission was rejected. There were not many revision opinions. The re-submitment at the end of September was another month.In the trial, it does not meet the speed of RSC journals.

(1) Thank | 159753

Received a review notice for one month, overhauled, revised and submitted, and acceptd one week.high speed.

(0) Thank | X

less than a month, the speed is very fastSecond review after overhaulTotal three monthsExperienced 4 reviewers rejectedvery sad

(0) Thank | xxx

July 15 submission, why is the status going back and forth between With editor and in peer review??

(3) Thank | sugar

The review was almost two months. During the period, there were six changes in the status of the editor and in peer review. Hey, the review comments differ greatly?

(2) Thank | 111

3月29#SubmissionApril 21 Review comments returned, two minor repairsOn April 28th, I received the

(2) Thank | xjstaa@163.com

The efficiency of this journal is still very high. I have contributed 4 articles in this journal, 3 revised editions, 1 tragedy.The opinion of the first instance is generally around 20 days, and the maximum is also within 50 days (the opinion of the first instance is not uniform, and the arbitration is sought)One of them from the submission to the reception is about 5 weeks, nearly 20 days in the first trial, revised for nearly 30 days, received the next day after the manuscript, the efficiency is very high ah

(1) Thank | flybird

The most boring journal in history, only two reviewers after two months of review, the editor found two reviewers, three months of review cycle, the latter twoThe reviewers did not read the article seriously, and said that the article was not new. The reviewer was too fucking irresponsible.

(4) Thank | 小哥

Submitted on the day of submission, I look forward to good results!

(1) Thank | 834170677@qq.com

The fighter in the garbage, reviewing the draft for two months, two reviewers for a minor repair, one according to.I found a third reviewer.The highlight came, the third reviewer barely read the article, just made judgments based on his attempts, and from his comments, it should not be the direction of my research.The instructor means that he can only recognize himself bad luck.

(1) Thank | qqxiaoheima

Ask the third floor master, my situation is similar to yours, transferred to PCCP by Nanoscale editor, the first time I encountered this situation, may I ask if you have just received the transfer to the PCCP journal?What does the Submission Office do?Thank you!

(0) Thank | 838890144@qq.com

PCCP is an excellent academic journal of materialization and chemical physics.The work includes both experimental materialization, pure theoretical development, and computational simulation.The influence factor of PCCP in the field of materialization exceeds JPC and JCP, which is very influential.The work requirements are comprehensive and novel, and the general calculations or simple applications of existing calculations cannot be published on PCCP.

(8) Thank | Anonymous

restored to the Chemistry 2 District Magazine.

(5) Thank | yiyi

EES was edited and transferred to PCCP. The speed is very fast! The first-instance opinion re-submitted or rejected the manuscript! Subsequently, there was basically no modification, and some supplementary explanations were made, and the second-instance minor repair!After returning, the article accepts! October 17 contribution to November 19, about one month before and after the online publication!

(1) Thank | Anonymous