8.24, submission; 9.24, accepted. It was my first SCI article. The speed was very fast; I support it!

(0) Thank | jungle1

My review comments came back after 2 months. My review comments were finally delivered on May 30, 2017. The editor-in-chief said that some of the reviewers did not reply, so the review process was prolonged.

(0) Thank | daoq_b@sjtu.edu.cn

Please update the information. The article was accepted in less than two months. However, as it was minor revisions, it may not be of general reference value. Typically, I believe articles should start at least two months ahead. Please consider this carefully.

(0) Thank | jjw2024

Submitted. The editor sent it to several reviewers, but only one of them was willing to review it. The first reviewer completed the review in three to four days. After that, there was a period of inactivity. After pushing for an update, I received a generic response. Finally, it was delayed for nearly a month. It seems they couldn't find other reviewers, so only this one reviewer provided feedback to me.

The given time frame was approximately 15 days.

For the resubmission, it seems like I have to go through the same process as the first submission. I am a bit confused. There is an option to choose reviewers, but I am not sure if I need to change the reviewer. This is the most confusing part for me.

After waiting for about a month (the status was always "with editor"), I was suddenly informed that the article had been accepted.

(0) Thank | jjw2024

One new submission, two reviewers, revised once, accepted in 45 days, very fast!

(0) Thank | uyujbyj

In the field of superconductivity, journals such as SUST, Phys C, TAS, and New Mag are now reviewing submissions at a speed similar to SUST, which takes about a month. The other two journals are currently slower. If the level of innovation is not strong enough, consider submitting to this journal

(1) Thank | uyujbyj

Reviewing speed is still very fast, very happy.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Every time I think of this journal, I sigh.In fact, as a super-conducting professional journal, after so many super-thermal conduction, the impact factor is so terrible, some things really need editors to think about it.The slow speed of reviewing the manuscript, a lot of bad news in the meeting, and quick change, still have time.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /505713/description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Generally speaking, as long as you do research on chemical synthesis and analysisIf the result has a certain value, it is not difficult to hit!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal mainly publishes papers related to superconducting physics and its applications, and is a highly professional journal.Please be cautious when submitting articles, so as not to be drafted because the content is irrelevant.In addition, the journal reviewed the paper faster.

(0) Thank | Anonymous