My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 38660 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Journal Title AbbreviationsPEST MANAG SCI
ISSN1526-498X
E-ISSN1526-4998
h-index107
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.001.2131.560
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Agronomy and Crop Science
Q129 / 334
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Insect Science
Q16 / 142

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.50%
Official Websitehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4998
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pm-wiley
Open AccessNo
PublisherJOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER, ENGLAND, W SUSSEX, PO19 8SQ
Subject AreaAgriculture and Forestry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2000
Annual Article Volume369
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1526-498X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-19 11:46:00
This journal’s processing speed seems slow and several of my papers were directly rejected (desk rejections)…

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1181039407@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 10:59:31
submitted, with editor Two months, under review for two months, modify, various small problems, modifyAfter returning, with the editor for two months, refused to draft, all kinds of problems, the subject does not meet what.I made glyphosate, this month of rejection, the journal made a special issue about glyphosate.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 1181039407@qq.com

Author: 15013006232@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-20 20:15:50
Submitted in mid-April 2017, returned on June 5th, 2 reviewers, one gave more opinions, and the second reviewer wrote the whole articleModifications, from beginning to end, including the table title are modified, very serious, is equivalent to help us to polish the article for free.Then, on July 5th, I will return to receive it directly. On August 18th, I will reply directly to the reception. Due to the second language modification, the journal will be published directly online and will not be minor.Received for less than 4 months in total.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 15013006232@163.com

Author: 15013006232@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-20 20:15:44
Submitted in mid-April 2017, returned on June 5th, 2 reviewers, one gave a more extensive opinion, and the second reviewer wrote the whole article on the writing of the paper.Modifications, from beginning to end, including the table title are modified, very serious, is equivalent to help us to polish the article for free.Then, on July 5th, I will return to receive it directly. On August 18th, I will reply directly to the reception. Due to the second language modification, the journal will be published directly online and will not be minor.Received for less than 4 months in total.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 15013006232@163.com

Author: fafupuyuchen@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-29 20:08:26
The impact factor is increasing year by year, it is a good journal, and the requirements are stricter.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fafupuyuchen@163.com

Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:35:13
reviewer's attitudeOk, the impact factor rises to 3.253
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM

Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:34:54
Reviewer's attitude is good, the impact factor rises to 3.253
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM

Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:33:20
Reviewer's attitude is good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM

Author: zcq@njau.edu.cn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-04 21:19:35
This journal is a district in our academic field. Although the impact factor is not high, it has a high impact.The review speed is average, but the second trial is very fast.The editor is more picky.But if the data or research content is very similar, it is worth trying.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | zcq@njau.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-17 15:27:00
is a marathon review, submitted in 2009.12, received in 2011.05, officially published in 2012.02, revised three times, and tortured for nearly two years.However, the editor is really good, very patient, and the reviewer is impatient and refuses to submit the manuscript. I don't know if it is luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-21 22:39:00
The editorial attitude is very nice, and I gave a reply in a month.Overhauled once, also for a month; after a few more minor sentences, I received it for a total of two and a half months.But now I don't know the time of online. It seems to be a long time. It has been two months, and there is no news.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-28 15:01:00
The journal reply is very nice, the article I selectd for, it is recommended to overhaul one month after the first trial, and the advice given by the second trial for about 15 days is Xiaoxiu. After 10 days of minor repair, I feel that the speed of reviewing can still beIt was published online 2 months after the acceptance, but it took more than 4 months for the online official release. The overall feeling of reviewing the paper is very fast. The lack of publication is very slow!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-18 16:12:00
contributed on November 23, 2011, Under Review on 26th; Awaiting Decision on December 18.It feels a bit fast, and the first-instance cycle is more than a month longer than the last published article (published article).
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-13 15:40:00
Editing attitude is good, the first trial is not too slow (one month), I don't know how to judge the second trial
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-15 15:23:00
first trial: my two months reply on time, the comment is fair,A minor repair, a major overhaul, and finally a major overhaul; second trial: two weeks to reply, receive.Publishing may be slower...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-01-18 17:25:00
The reply is quite gentle, but it is relatively slow, two months, and the first-instance opinion draft
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service