Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | OPT LASER TECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0030-3992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 9.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/optics-and-laser-technology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/JOLT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Physics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0030-3992%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: 93% Data from Elsevier: 33% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 2.3 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY: | Write a review |
Author: optics 皮卡丘 Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-10-12 10:07:20 Submitted: Jun 08, 2020; Accepted: Oct 11, 2020. It was ok after the submission; the status with editor lasted one month. I urged it, but it was still with editor. It took about one month for the review. At that time, it took about ten days to make a decision. I continue to urge before receiving the email of major revision. After submitting the revised manuscript, it was accepted in about one month (during the period, it took 10 days for with editor). After urging the manuscript, it was nor reviewed but the status changed to decision in process directly. One week later, the email of acceptance was received. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小张同学paperaccept Subject Area: Physics Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-03-08 09:00:54 One article was just accepted yesterday. There were 2 reviewers. After the first review, one reviewer said that the language was illogical, and it was not worthy of publication; the other one said that the language was fluent, but the innovation was not enough. 60 days was given for the major revision by the editor. During the period, because of the writing of other two articles, this one was revised after one month of delay. However, I personally though it was a minor revision, and just explained the reason for writing this way to reviewer 1. I added a parameter of laser radar. I explained the innovation to the reviewer 2. The reviewers agreed and accepted the manuscript after review, but the editor delayed for a week before sending the notice of acceptance. And the notice was sent to every author (unlike other journals that only send the corresponding author). Sure enough, the editors in North American were relatively slow, but fortunately, the article was accepted. It was the first article in my master period. What’s more, this journal has risen from Q3 to Q2, which was an unexpected gain. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 五味子 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-04 22:27:33 I submitted the manuscript on August 3. Major revision was required on October 1, and two months was given for major revision. There were seven reviewers, some of them had nearly 10 comments, and there were dozens of comments in total, but some of them were overlapped. Since it was the first submission, it took a long time to revise the manuscript. I revised it for nearly 2 months, and resubmitted it in the end of November. It was accepted on March 4, 2019. The waiting process was very tiring, but the result was good, and I will still consider submitting to Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-12-02 20:07:00 I needed to revise my English writing several times before my paper was accepted. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ShengTianJiao Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-15 11:31:38 The application was submitted on July 13th and is still in the "we" stage. The dates in "we" have changed twice, and I don't know what it means. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 辰熙 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-14 08:57:36 Submitted on July 22nd, currently it is WE, but cannot submit in the future, it is too slow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 丁孟辉 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-13 14:17:19 8.8: submitted 8.9: with editor 8.13: still with editor Keep an eye on it, any fellow travelers on the same day? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 立夏 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-13 13:18:46 Update: 8.10 UR I remember there used to be a link to track the progress. But now the link provided does not show the specific step of the review process. ![]() ![]() |
Author: nnnn Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-12 23:31:10 Hello, may I ask if it takes one month for this journal with editor? Also, if you don't mind me asking, what is your research direction? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 杨挺凯 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-12 17:04:35 My submission on 7.16, is still under review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 好发发发发 Subject Area: Multidisciplinary Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-10 20:49:39 2025.4.29 submit to journal 2025.4.30 with editor 2025.6.10 RRC but the public account shows that one reviewer has not finished reviewing 2025.6.29 The last reviewer finished reviewing, receiving technical editing and major revision 2025.6.30 Major Revise 2025.7.11 Revision with editor 2025.8.1 RRC 2025.8.10 Three reviewers agree to publish The end, thank the editor and reviewers! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept_Paper! Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-07 16:44:20 May I ask how long it is generally advisable to wait for the second review? It has been two weeks already, and the first reviewer has completed their review, but the second reviewer has not yet accepted the assignment. ![]() ![]() |
Author: EDCNJR Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-05 12:37:20 The manuscript submitted on the same day has not yet received the first round review result. It's nerve-wracking. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小草 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-04 21:05:32 Thank you for the comments and sharing from all my friends. I would also like to contribute by sharing my submission experience with everyone. I am a reviewer for this journal and this is my first submission. 2025.5.21 Submission 2025.6.26 Major revision 2025.7.4 Resubmission after major revision 2025.7.8 Under Review 2025.7.10 First reviewer accepted and completed the review 2025.7.10 Second reviewer accepted the review 2025.7.30 Second reviewer completed the review 2025.8.2 Decision in Progress 2025.8.4 Accepted Actually, I am also reviewing papers for this journal. In simple terms, unless the content is particularly innovative, it is difficult to be given the opportunity. After all, being the top player in Zone 2 under the optical partition, there is still a certain threshold. It is suitable for excellent work on small projects and general work from large project groups to submit... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 辰熙 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-04 20:21:57 I have a headache, just like you. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 立夏 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-04 13:17:59 7.22 submitted 7.24 with editor 8.4 Still with editor... The time hasn't changed, can I send an email to urge them? ![]() ![]() |
Author: x Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-31 19:19:47 How come yours got reviewed so quickly while others have to wait for half a month? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 阿雷画大饼 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-25 14:20:41 You are progressing too fast... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 陈都灵前男友 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-22 16:44:52 The editor is very friendly and works very quickly. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 七月上 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-21 15:41:39 I was rejected after major revisions! It's too painful! ![]() ![]() |
Author: ab_xu123 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-17 23:07:27 I can feel the discomfort of the respondent, sending hugs. ![]() ![]() |
Author: water066 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-16 21:20:40 7.16 拒绝 ![]() ![]() |
Author: 我想审一区TOP Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-15 10:17:49 Different editors have different levels of enthusiasm, and reviewers also have varying speeds. The editor I took over is very diligent, updating almost every four to five days, providing an excellent submission experience! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 想揍小麻瓜 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-15 09:33:00 June 11th With Editor July 15th With Editor ![]() ![]() |
Author: Accept_Paper! Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-12 18:13:19 Excuse me, experts, when resubmitting this journal for revision, what else do I need to prepare besides the revised manuscript? Do the changes or additions in the revised manuscript need to be marked in a different color? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |