The first time for submitting to ND. I do research in the multi-agent collaborative control direction. It lasted for 4 months, first review for 3 months, second review for 1 month, then it got accepted. There were two reviewers before and after. 18 Jun 2020 submitted; 12 Sep 2020 major revision; 21 Sep 2020 resubmitted; 27 Oct 2020 accept. Generally speaking, the journal has high requirements for innovation in papers.

(255) Thank | Runx

Be careful! I have published some articles in other journals before. I want to give it a try to NODY before graduation. From submission to rejection, it took one year. 16 Jul 2018 submitted; 2 Nov 2018 major revision; 1 Dec 2019 resubmitted; 12 Mar 2019 major revision; 20 Apr 2019 resubmitted; 08 Jul 2019 Reject. Although there were a lot of problems during the first revision, I personally felt okay. In the second time, new reviewers raised some sharp questions, but I had to add proofs and experiments. I was so afraid but it finally got rejected. I was not convinced and wrote to the editor in chief, requesting an arbitration, but I am still waiting for the reply. Students who have good papers in the top hands of the second district and have plenty of time can try NODY. Unexpectedly, they give the author three or four months for each major revision.

(20) Thank | jenifer

NODY is a highly professional journal with strict requirements on innovation. The reviewer's opinions are pertinent and objective. The editor handles the external review quickly. His response to the author is a bit lagging but very polite. There’s no limit for the length of the manuscript, or any forced self-citation phenomenon. Our paper is 24 pages long and includes 77 references, none of which are from NODY. The manuscript submitted in October 2018, and after major and minor revisions, it was accepted and online in March 2019. The efficiency is quite high.

(31) Thank | scottkinhpu

In this research field, many leading authors publishing articles in this journal. After I submitted my paper I realized the editor in chief passed away.

(12) Thank | Comeon!

After being hired, how long does it take to proofread? It's been 10 days and I still haven't received any proofreading.

(0) Thank | dmq086

Have you revised your draft? I was hired at 7:30.

(0) Thank | dmq086

May I ask how long does the technical review usually take? It has been two or three days and I still haven't received any updates.

(0) Thank | tuling123

Received on July 31st, finally, just not sure when to start proofreading.

(0) Thank | Kakaxi_001

Could you please let me know the timeline for submissions? I have been waiting for days after making revisions to the first draft and have not heard anything yet.

(0) Thank | jcz24

The top journal in the field of nonlinear dynamics, as well as an authoritative journal in the field of vibration control, has previously rejected three submissions, but after four months of effort, this time it has finally been successful. We hope to return to the top.

(0) Thank | stupid sheep

If there are issues with the technical review, the submission system will prompt for modifications.

(0) Thank | Anonym_2023

The submitting author can view the system, while the corresponding author only receives emails.

(0) Thank | Anonym_2023

Could you please let me know if non-communicating authors can also access this query page?

(0) Thank | syan19

The speed is really fast, my two-wheeler has been waiting for 1 month without being processed.

(1) Thank | Kakaxi_001

Recently, it seems that no one has been working on the submissions. Mine has been waiting for 40 days and still no one has processed it.

(0) Thank | Kakaxi_001

The communication mailbox will receive emails.

(0) Thank | 1111

Hello, I also checked with the technical review department, they said they have sent me an email, but I haven't received it after waiting for half a day. Is this normal? Should I send an email to inquire?

(0) Thank | zxrsherry

Hello, I also checked with the technical review team and they said they have already sent me an email, but I haven't received it after waiting for half a day. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | zxrsherry

Why is my still WE, how long do you all WE, how many days does it usually take to peer review?

(0) Thank | 1111

I submitted my paper on February 5th and received the first round of review comments on May 30th. I have two weeks to make revisions.

(0) Thank | Kakaxi_001

The journal has a particularly fast speed, from submission to acceptance in one and a half months; 
submitted for technical review on June 4th, lacking a statement at the end of the article, resubmitted on June 5th;
submitted for review on June 14th, invited 10+ reviewers for the first review, 6 reviewers accepted the review;
after receiving 25 comments from three reviewers on June 28th, the editor directly requested revisions, giving two weeks' time. The reviewers' comments were very professional and the speed was also very fast;
submitted revised manuscript on July 11th, all three reviewers for the second review agreed;
directly accepted on July 19th; the editor's handling speed was very fast, thanks to the editor and reviewers!

(2) Thank | Anonym_2023

Hello, OP, I would like to ask how long it took for your approval.

(0) Thank | whisper114

Could you please provide the reminder email address? I can't wait any longer and urgently need to use the paper.

(0) Thank | Kakaxi_001

Two out of the four reviewers for the second review accepted the manuscript and provided feedback, while the other two did not accept the manuscript. What should we do about this?

(0) Thank | 西柚

The quality of peer review is too poor now, with either accept, reject or revise decisions being made without asking technical questions. It is either punctuation or grammar, and very general.

(0) Thank | Uynixuiq