Research Creative   My Account   Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[NEUROIMAGE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 163733 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNEUROIMAGE
Journal Title AbbreviationsNEUROIMAGE
ISSN1053-8119
E-ISSN1095-9572
h-index320
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
11.302.4361.668
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Neuroscience
Subcategory: Cognitive Neuroscience
Q17 / 115
Category: Neuroscience
Subcategory: Neurology
Q113 / 192

Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021)13.20%
期刊简介Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Official Websitehttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/neuroimage
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/YNIMG/default.aspx
Open AccessYes
PublisherACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, USA, CA, 92101-4495
Subject AreaMedicine
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1992
Annual Article Volume582
Gold OA文章占比
OA期刊相关信息
WOS期刊SCI分区
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1053-8119%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 10 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NEUROIMAGE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on NEUROIMAGE: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-26 20:55:00
This is an interdisciplinary journal of life sciences and computer graphics. It has a 20% hit rate. The review and publication speed is relatively fast. Generally, there are four reviewers.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 雨巷少年芸溪


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-10-12 20:59:47
Hello, how many reviewers are there?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 雨巷少年芸溪

Author: Jalon


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-09-11 08:47:55
Direction: Deep Learning + Medical Image Processing
23.12.07 Submitted, two reviewers accepted the invitation
24.01.09 Rejection can be resubmitted
24.04.26 Resubmitted, two reviewers accepted the invitation, one new (many issues) and one old (almost no issues)
24.05.31 Major revision, given 21 days, requested extension for one month
24.07.21 Submitted
24.08.09 One reviewer provided feedback
24.08.21 The other reviewer seems to have not accepted the invitation, editor sent out 4 new invitations
24.09.11 A total of 9 invitations were sent out, no new reviewers accepted the invitation (this journal is not working, all reviewers have blacklisted it)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Jalon

Author: vito


Subject Area: 计算机科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-08-02 16:30:55
24.8.2 Accept

请提供更多上下文以便进行翻译。
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | vito

Author: vito


Subject Area: 计算机科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-08-01 14:15:14
Deep Learning Direction
24.5.31 Submission, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted
24.6.21 Major Revision
Both reviewers provided professional comments. The first reviewer requested additional experimental details (mainly for reproducibility) and modifications to the discussion section, with mostly positive feedback. The second reviewer questioned the novelty and raised some minor issues, with more negative feedback.
24.7.5 R1 submission
24.7.15 Major Revision
Reviewer 1 mostly agreed and provided some minor suggestions. Reviewer 2 acknowledged the previous revisions but continued to question the novelty.
24.7.25 R2 submission
24.7.31 Minor Revision
Reviewer 1 was not invited for direct acceptance. Reviewer 2 quickly reviewed and expressed doubts being resolved and agreed to accept after the addition of an ethics statement requested by the editor in the email.
24.8.1 R3 submission

The review process was fast, and reviewers were invited promptly after the initial submission. The review speed was also good. However, one thing to note is that while R1, R2, and R3 were all given 21 days in the emails, only R1 had the full 21 days in the system, with the subsequent two times having only 14 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | vito

Author: 南瓜的南


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-07-05 13:24:56
There is no way, imaging neuroscience has no impact factor yet, and it is not even in SCI. Some work still needs to be submitted to NeuroImage first. This year, the proportion of Chinese manuscripts accepted for publication is unprecedentedly high, the situation is not optimistic.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 南瓜的南

Author: 不良帅哥


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-07-05 10:20:03
The questions asked by the reviewers are very professional, and they also respond relatively quickly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 不良帅哥

Author: 慕白ss


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-06-17 11:24:24
We have received very positive and widespread feedback after the release of our statement. The positive feedback comes not only from within the field: scholars from other fields have also expressed support and suggested that journals in their fields undergo similar reforms. Within a few days, over 1200 scholars have signed up to review manuscripts for "Imaging Neuroscience". In less than a year since its founding, we have received 800 submissions and published 150 high-quality papers. After rigorous peer review (usually 2-3 rounds), we have accepted approximately 35% of submissions. The academic community has confidence in the editing team of "Imaging Neuroscience" and is committed to building the new journal.

We expect to release more information related to the impact factor of "Imaging Neuroscience" in the coming years. "Imaging Neuroscience" has been listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The MIT Press has applied to include "Imaging Neuroscience" in PubMed search results, and if successful, all new and previously published papers from this journal will be searchable in PubMed. Similarly, we have applied for inclusion in Scopus and Web of Science/ESCI/JCR
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 慕白ss

Author: 慕白ss


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-06-17 11:24:11
The editing team of "Imaging Neuroscience", the research field, and the control of paper quality are completely consistent with the editorial team of "NeuroImage" and "NeuroImage: Reports" before the editorial team resigned.

The editing team of "Imaging Neuroscience" includes one chief editor, 11 senior editors, and 31 associate editors; it is a highly committed and dedicated team composed of leading experts in the field. In addition, we also have an editorial board consisting of over 60 renowned scholars who provide the core editing team with richer experience and professional knowledge, and they also participate in the journal's strategic planning, serving as "trusted representatives" of the current development in the field
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 慕白ss

Author: 慕白ss


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-06-17 11:23:32
In April 2023, all 43 editors of the journals "NeuroImage" and "NeuroImage: Reports" collectively resigned. One month later, this editorial team (referred to as "us") founded "Imaging Neuroscience". For a long time, "NeuroImage" has been the flagship journal in the field of neuroimaging, both in terms of quality and quantity of papers, but its high publishing costs were considered unethical and unsustainable by all editors (and colleagues in the neuroimaging community). Despite several rounds of negotiations, the publisher of "NeuroImage", Elsevier, refused to lower the publishing costs, prompting us to collaborate with the MIT Press to create "Imaging Neuroscience" with the aim of replacing "NeuroImage" as the new flagship journal in the field. We see "Imaging Neuroscience" as the successor to "NeuroImage", with the key difference being that the academic community has greater control over the new journal in terms of adopting "modern" and "ethical" publishing practices (including publishing costs
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 慕白ss

Author: 彬冰


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-06-01 20:09:55
This magazine is completely useless now. Due to its high fees, it has been almost blacklisted by all the big shots in the field of neuroimaging
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 彬冰

Author: hayuyi


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-05-31 10:29:45
Is it an OA journal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hayuyi

Author: jlr666


Subject Area: 心理学
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-05-16 15:20:17
Can this journal only choose OA?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jlr666

Author: Ron Tommy


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2023-12-26 12:59:13
So are you accepting it?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Ron Tommy

Author: 小耗子


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2023-11-03 11:37:44
Accepted with revisions, everything was fast except for the review time, with two weeks for initial review and two weeks for review after revisions
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小耗子

Author: 小耗子


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2023-09-08 22:56:21
An email was sent from the system to remind you, and the revised draft has been returned with comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小耗子

Author: zsq0616


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2023-08-18 19:46:05
The same situation, it feels like it's related to a large number of editors resigning. Is there any new progress upstairs? Do we need to remind the editors?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zsq0616

Author: 小耗子


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2023-08-09 13:30:29
I have been with the editor for over two months, and it still hasn't been reviewed. I feel hopeless!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小耗子

Author: 巴蜀书妍


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2022-11-17 23:05:11
How do magazines recommend reviewers?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 巴蜀书妍

Author: FrankPub


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2022-07-15 05:16:47
Submitted on December 28, 2021;
Notified of major revisions three months later;
Returned for minor revisions in June;
Accepted on July 11, 2022.

Both reviewers asked professional questions, with one being particularly meticulous. After half a year of submission, it was finally accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | FrankPub

Author: 这个这个这个


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2022-06-07 00:40:09
Received by the editor, the article was sent for review after 4 days. The first review result was given after 2 months, followed by major revisions which were accepted one month later. There were three reviewers, one of whom provided 8 very high-level comments but no suggestions, another gave two suggestions for acceptance, and the third had no suggestions but recommended acceptance. The editor requested major revisions, which were completed and accepted after one month. The review process was fast, and the reviewers demonstrated a high level of expertise.
Show Review in Original Language
(33) Thank | 这个这个这个

Author: 这个这个这个


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2022-05-31 22:11:34
With the editor, it usually takes about two weeks. After the editor approves it, it is sent for review. Rejections are also typically given within two weeks. The speed is considered quite fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 这个这个这个

Author: alex_zhao_zi


Subject Area: Life Science学
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2022-04-14 11:22:27
First job in reading a doctorate... The reviewer's comments are constructive. However, as I read more papers, I found that the quality of the content varies. In the future, I will continue to consider submitting some small works or unsatisfactory results to this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | alex_zhao_zi

Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2021-12-30 20:14:11
Different journals may have different requirements, so it's important to follow the specific guidelines of each journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2021-12-30 13:56:38
Journal official websites will have author guidance, and there will be detailed formatting requirements on the page
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [NEUROIMAGE]:







© 2010-2025  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Servic