My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nature Protocols

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nature Protocols]Hello, you are Visitor Number 42215 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNature Protocols
Journal Title AbbreviationsNAT PROTOC
ISSN1754-2189
E-ISSN1750-2799
h-index206
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
20.407.6493.026
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
Q15 / 197

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)1.30%
Official Websitehttp://www.nature.com/nprot
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mts-np.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, ENGLAND, N1 9XW
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume143
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1754-2189%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nature Protocols】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Nature Protocols: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-19 14:54:06
The draft paper was submitted in March. After three or four revisions, it was officially accepted in December. At the request of the editor, some experiments were carried out to apply protocols to other cell lines, supplementing the pictures of the thesis previously published by the instructor. Three reviewers reviewed the draft, and one of them dismissed it. But the editors expressed interest. The review process is meticulous and the requirements for troubleshooting are high.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 笑哥哥


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-05 00:22:38
tossing back and forth for 7 months. Recently, it has finally been accepted in principle.Also change some things according to the reviewer's intentions.The request is something that has already been published and is influential.Yeah, there is no problem of secondary publication, you can fill an article more, the factors are still okay, and it is ok in computational chemistry.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 笑哥哥

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-17 13:51:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-24 10:06:00
Fortunately, one of the requests is a method that has been used in the published articles.First, I want to write an outline to see if the editor is interested. Then I will recommend to select for the full version. I have done it twice before and after. The requirements are relatively high. I used to ask for a modification of nearly 100 places, which led me to give up.The final submission was accepted 4 months later.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-20 16:20:00
IF(2010): 8.362
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-28 15:14:00
IF(2007):1.671
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Nature Protocols]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service