X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine]Hello, you are Visitor Number 40298 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOMED-NANOTECHNOL
ISSN1549-9634
E-ISSN1549-9642
h-index106
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
10.701.2631.080
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Pharmaceutical Science
Q16 / 166
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Medicine (miscellaneous)
Q115 / 238
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Biomedical Engineering
Q119 / 229
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Molecular Medicine
Q116 / 167
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Materials Science (all)
Q147 / 455
Category: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q119 / 148

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)3.20%
Official Websitehttp://www.nanomedjournal.com/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/nano/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started2005
Annual Article Volume220
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1549-9634%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 6.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.9 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 31.25%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 12.2 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine: Write a review
Author: 不带们


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-06-01 17:22:52
The article was submitted in April, and the result was returned in the mid-May, and minor revision was required. One week after the submission of reply, it was accepted directly. The main reason why I chose this journal is that I usually read the articles and think the direction is relatively appropriate. I feel the editor and reviewers were very professional and efficient, and I don't know what happened to those who said the review was slow in the comments.

(7) Thank | 不带们

Author: yuzhangxueren


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-29 11:46:30
Although the cycle is long, the journal is very rigorous, and the three-page full of comments from reviewers is also of great benefit to the improvement of the quality of the article. When can we settle down to do scientific research? Does this epidemic help? I look forward to it. I also look forward that this journal could be a classic, and it can leave some excellent works after the nano is no longer a research hot.

(2) Thank | yuzhangxueren

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-15 19:42:00
The process is slow. First of all, the reviewers were very professional and helpful. They were all established in the medical field. However, my work uses new nano-compounds. One reviewer asked me what is the use of this? He doesn't care whether it is new or not. He only cares about whether he can use it in the future. What is better than traditional materials?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: hxx


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-27 09:12:54
Nanomedicine, submitted in December of the 16th, has been returned for 4 months in the first trial. The reviewer's opinion is very detailed and requires a lot of time. It gives two months to complete the experiment, and then goes through the second and third trials.The twists and turns were officially accepted in November 17th.The review is slow, and if you want to hurry up, don't recommend this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hxx

Author: niming


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-23 10:44:22
Submission in late May, waited for two months to have a review opinion, and received it in late August after the minor repair, for more than three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | niming

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-01 10:58:00
The method of controlling the number of articles is very effective. It has risen to 6.692.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-24 11:03:00
This journal is very slow. After submitting the status, it has been submitted to journal.The state of the day was changed to with editor. Later, when the Internet was checked for a long time, the journal was submitted for a long time.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-06 00:16:00
feels too slow, not only the review process, but the entire manuscript acceptance process is also very slow.My manuscript was selectd on December 6th. With the editor status approaching 3 months, I was ready to fill the manuscript after 3 months of no news. The result was under review on February 26, now 40 days, still under review.It seems that the first half of the year is not reporting hope.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-25 14:54:00
has been reviewed for 1 month until today, and has not been reviewed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-04 12:06:00
is very slow, but the editor is very responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service