The process is slow. First of all, the reviewers were very professional and helpful. They were all established in the medical field. However, my work uses new nano-compounds. One reviewer asked me what is the use of this? He doesn't care whether it is new or not. He only cares about whether he can use it in the future. What is better than traditional materials?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Nanomedicine, submitted in December of the 16th, has been returned for 4 months in the first trial. The reviewer's opinion is very detailed and requires a lot of time. It gives two months to complete the experiment, and then goes through the second and third trials.The twists and turns were officially accepted in November 17th.The review is slow, and if you want to hurry up, don't recommend this journal.

(0) Thank | hxx

Submission in late May, waited for two months to have a review opinion, and received it in late August after the minor repair, for more than three months.

(0) Thank | niming

The method of controlling the number of articles is very effective. It has risen to 6.692.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is very slow. After submitting the status, it has been submitted to journal.The state of the day was changed to with editor. Later, when the Internet was checked for a long time, the journal was submitted for a long time.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

feels too slow, not only the review process, but the entire manuscript acceptance process is also very slow.My manuscript was selectd on December 6th. With the editor status approaching 3 months, I was ready to fill the manuscript after 3 months of no news. The result was under review on February 26, now 40 days, still under review.It seems that the first half of the year is not reporting hope.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been reviewed for 1 month until today, and has not been reviewed.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is very slow, but the editor is very responsible.

(0) Thank | Anonymous