| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | NANOMED-NANOTECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1549-9634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1549-9642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 3.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | http://www.nanomedjournal.com/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | http://ees.elsevier.com/nano/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 220 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1549-9634%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 6.0 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 8.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 31.25% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 12.2 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine: | Write a review |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-15 19:42:00 The process is slow. First of all, the reviewers were very professional and helpful. They were all established in the medical field. However, my work uses new nano-compounds. One reviewer asked me what is the use of this? He doesn't care whether it is new or not. He only cares about whether he can use it in the future. What is better than traditional materials?  (0) Thank | Anonymous  |
| Author: hxx Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-27 09:12:54 Nanomedicine, submitted in December of the 16th, has been returned for 4 months in the first trial. The reviewer's opinion is very detailed and requires a lot of time. It gives two months to complete the experiment, and then goes through the second and third trials.The twists and turns were officially accepted in November 17th.The review is slow, and if you want to hurry up, don't recommend this journal. (0) Thank | hxx |
| Author: niming Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-23 10:44:22 Submission in late May, waited for two months to have a review opinion, and received it in late August after the minor repair, for more than three months. (0) Thank | niming |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-07-01 10:58:00 The method of controlling the number of articles is very effective. It has risen to 6.692. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-02-24 11:03:00 This journal is very slow. After submitting the status, it has been submitted to journal.The state of the day was changed to with editor. Later, when the Internet was checked for a long time, the journal was submitted for a long time. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-04-06 00:16:00 feels too slow, not only the review process, but the entire manuscript acceptance process is also very slow.My manuscript was selectd on December 6th. With the editor status approaching 3 months, I was ready to fill the manuscript after 3 months of no news. The result was under review on February 26, now 40 days, still under review.It seems that the first half of the year is not reporting hope. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-03-25 14:54:00 has been reviewed for 1 month until today, and has not been reviewed. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-02-04 12:06:00 is very slow, but the editor is very responsible. (0) Thank | Anonymous |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |