Molecular Medicine Reports

Contribution log: 2019.10.1 Contribution, 2019.10.13 There had been no news for 3 months after returning the format modified revision. The reminder letter was sent every month. The replies were all under review. Then I forgot this article. I received the recommendation of major revisions while I was busy with other things. Major revisions were required on April 24, 2020. The major revisions were completed, including the editing of Spandidos' journals (polishing fee 1500). Minor revisions were required on June 17th, 2020, it was returned that night. It was accepted on June 18th, 2020. I received the proof email on June 25th, 2020. The proof content was quite troublesome. I need add references, adjust the format by myself, correct the table, etc. On July 1, 2020, the proof was completed. It went through four major and minor revisions during the proof stage. I wish you all success.

(3) Thank | polyae

The editor was very careful, and all the places he did not understand will let you explain, and let you provide the data, and let you revise. What’s more, the reviewers raised comments. The article was accepted after revision. After acceptance, the editor still raised a lot of comments, and edited the text. At that time, as long as you answered his questions on time, the manuscript would not be rejected. In this time, there were three editors who reviewed and raised comments in three stages. There were dozens of comments in total, which were very detailed.

(0) Thank | fanbiao

The editor was very responsible, and the comments the reviewer gave were very good. The manuscript was accepted after the second revision. There were only three statuses on the website: submit, under review and accept, and I was not clear about each specific step. They can only be understood by mail. It has been accepted now, but I have not yet received the proof.

(1) Thank | 珍珍猪

The process was a long period of review and revisions, and then acceptance. It took over 6 months for acceptance. The layout fee is not cheap. The material has to be read clearly and if it is not, then it will be rejected. It is said that this journal has a high self-introduction rate.

(1) Thank | Bluer

The journal is quit easy for acceptance. The review reports came after one month later. They have higher language quality to accept papers.

(0) Thank | pharmaalmamun@yahoo.com

has been submitted for more than 1 month, and is currently waiting for review comments

(0) Thank | torotov

Molecular biology content, a little more than two months after the initial review, return to minor repair, minor repair for twenty days, return to threeAccepted by the day.The editor is very good and makes a lot of good suggestions.I was also very patient. I sent three emails about the FIG format problem.

(0) Thank | lytton

2月外审回回一大修 3次小修

(0) Thank | 安安

is better, but it's really long, the manuscript is really useless, only patiently waiting

(1) Thank | luis

has been submitted without editing.

(0) Thank | kuoff

is really easy, but the time is long, noIf you are anxious, you can select

(0) Thank | yceee

proof is really slow, has not been received for a long time, has not received, the state is still in production

(2) Thank | yuuu

proof have to wait for more than half a year

(0) Thank | Anonymous

In 2012, I selectd for a small article in the lab for another Ph.D.In this journal, overall it is good.Focus on the logic of the whole.The information was modified for more than a month, and the editor was very responsible for helping to modify the grammar sentences.The page fee is 220 Euros, if you have a color map or a super page number, you will have to pay more.If you are anxious to wait for an article to graduate, or if you don't have too many good results to make a big article, this journal can give it a try.The impact factor was 1.17 in 2012, not bad.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Just-submitted with news to comment

(2) Thank | Anonymous