There were two reviewers. One reviewer asked some basic questions. The other reviewer who was very professional, asked quite a lot of questions. During the period, I experienced 1 major revision and 2 minor revisions. The main problem was that I waited too long during the preliminary process. It only took more than one month from modification to publication.

(2) Thank | 星空下

I recommend this journal to everyone. I had minor revisions, which I revised quickly. It took three months for acceptance.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

How long does it take for something to be under review?

(0) Thank | Wasya

What happened later? I submitted in early February, it was under review after 10 days, and now it's been a month with no news.

(0) Thank | Wasya

This journal is so strange, it has been reviewed by three reviewers for 5 months, revised and now it's under review again, it seems like it will take forever.

(0) Thank | Hedda Harvey

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: Are the editors of this journal not working at all?

(0) Thank | Byron Eddie

It's been half a month and I'm still with the editor. What's going on?

(0) Thank | 咏春秀慧

The review process of the magazine is relatively fast, with relatively high language requirements. The abstract, preface, and discussion sections are required to be strict. But overall, it is still very good

(0) Thank | EdIciusme

Well-established mainstream journals, with room for improvement in terms of categorization

(0) Thank | MolBreed

I was wondering how is your progress going? I haven't made any progress for over a month

(0) Thank | 东京一哲

It has been half a month already, will it be sent for review soon?

(0) Thank | 雅健小姐姐

Brother, how are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 珉林香冬

Has my brother withdrawn his submission? Mine has been with the editor for half a month

(0) Thank | 一只保胜呀

How do I withdraw my paper? I have emailed the editor but received no response. I have been “with editor” for a while now and cannot find the option to withdraw my submission

(0) Thank | 鹤轩小公主

What's the result? Any reminders for the submission?

(0) Thank | 千手白松

Have you had your external audit?

(0) Thank | 凌霄风珍

Four months is too long, brother

(0) Thank | 百花玉涵

Excuse me, how is it going? I have also been waiting for almost a month now. Is it still with the editor?

(0) Thank | 上清雅美

Review Speed: 12.0
Experience Sharing: It's really too slow, still under review after seven months, speechless

(0) Thank | 药王天亦

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Research focus: Gene polymorphism sharing experience: Submitted for nearly 2 months, still in the status with editor, sent an inquiry email to the section editor Martine Collart but no reply. It feels like a stone sinking into the sea, feeling exhausted. Does anyone have experience in urging this journal? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | 善思baby

Post hoc comparison refers to setting additional groups based on the characteristics of the data after data collection is completed, proposing research hypotheses, and conducting statistical analysis; it is testing non-research hypotheses and further exploratory analysis of the results

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

After-the-fact comparison is to test non-research hypothesis. It is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment, the hypothesis has been verified, but it is necessary to extend the research, so we need to continue to explore the data and see which direction will bring valuable conclusions. At this point, it is equivalent to testing all possible comparisons (although in reality, I cannot exhaust all comparisons, but because there is no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential). Because comparison does not only refer to the difference between the means of two treatments, linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why perform post-audit?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

What is post-hoc testing?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Five months have passed and it is still under review

(0) Thank | 药王天亦