My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Microchimica Acta

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Microchimica Acta]Hello, you are Visitor Number 75038 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleMicrochimica Acta
Journal Title AbbreviationsMICROCHIM ACTA
ISSN0026-3672
E-ISSN1436-5073
h-index74
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.101.3001.114
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Analytical Chemistry
Q116 / 119

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)29.10%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/604
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/MIAC
Open AccessYes (Hybrid OA journal)
PublisherSPRINGER WIEN, SACHSENPLATZ 4-6, PO BOX 89, WIEN, AUSTRIA, A-1201
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationAUSTRIA
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1937
Annual Article Volume846
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0026-3672%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher: 52 days, Submission to first decision
112 days, Submission to acceptance

Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 33%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Microchimica Acta】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Microchimica Acta: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-14 21:32:33
This journal is not too demanding for innovative work, but it is very strict and demanding. My understanding is that your article can be general, but the text, structure, and data must be very standardized. Your material must be treated carefully. There are 3 reviewers. I had 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul, and editorial advice of various kinds. The editor is very serious. The summary and introduction can all indicate a bunch of problems. I took a month to overhaul the article and resubmitted it. They accepted it.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 我以为你不再选我了呢


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-13 11:23:36
Submit more than 1After the month, I received the news: 3 reviewers gave a lot of comments, the editor gave the rejection, but invited the revision to re-attend.Revised for about a month, seriously replied to the opinions of the three reviewers, and the reply was super detailed.About 10 days after the resubmission, the editor accepted it directly and did not submit it for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(38) Thank | 我以为你不再选我了呢

Author: 18817313575@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 11:07:31
The manuscript of September 10th, 2017, the opinion coming in early November, the revised data will be returned at the beginning of December, and the 2018 New Year's Day will receive the information, a very good New Year gift.The impact factor of Online was 3 o'clock, and now it has risen to 5.7, which is even higher than the other one district article sent. It feels like a rise in the area is just around the corner!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 18817313575@163.com

Author: 739253589@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-09 08:23:15
Why did you receive it, but the page number is so slow?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 739253589@qq.com

Author: ASAP


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-26 23:11:49
The fourth part of this year's select. See the comment saying that the speed is fast. I selectd for the second submission. It is still Submitted to Journal but there is Manuscript Number.Can I come back in a month?Before the laboratory selectd inappropriately, it was the day that I refused to come to me. This efficiency is good, I hope it will be good luck...
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | ASAP

Author: yita


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-26 13:04:50
High, I received the first-instance opinion in about a month. Although I was rejected, I have to say that the reviewer is really serious and refuses to accept it.Personal feelings must be complete, take seriously, and highlight their own advantages.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | yita

Author: hahahaha


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-21 07:26:18
ending 2017 11. 20 Instant IF= 3387/679=4.98 If you can still increase by 20% before June 2018,The next IF will be more than 6.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | hahahaha

Author: aaa


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-07 17:44:35
How many impact factors are there now? How much next year?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aaa

Author: tutga


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-15 07:47:20
2017.9.14 even IFMicrochimica Acta 3.95Electroche. commun. 2.9Electrochimca Acta 3.25The 2018 IF is probably going beyond the EA and EC points, and it is a little faster!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | tutga

Author: Rios


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-14 09:10:51
Journal If you find a reviewer, the review comments are still very fast, usually half a month to a month.I submitted it on May 9th, I went to the editor on the 21st, an under review on June 9th, an under review on the 14th, a major revision on July 1st, a minor review of two reviewers, a major repair, and a journal for one month.Overhaul time.Seriously revised for 20 days, submitted a revised draft on July 20, only to the editor in the 31st, thought that it would be sent out for trial, did not expect the 12th state to become accept.The first SCI, the first time to submitted MCA, did not expect such a smooth ~ gave me a lot of confidence
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Rios

Author: 962968333@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-12 09:42:28
Help God.I selectd for three days, the status shows that I haven't edited yet, are you so slow?I want to page out before September. What should I do?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 962968333@qq.com

Author: cc300


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-11 13:25:38
2017.1.19 submitted, 3.17 received review comments, two reviewers, one minor repair, one heavy shot, and finally gave a major repair, one month of modification time; there are manyThe editor's office was changed very carefully, the editor was very responsible, and I rewrote my title and abstract..Compensatory experiment, carefully revised, 3.29 returned to the revised draft, 4.11 received.Very happy, I received it before graduation.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | cc300

Author: 499781143@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-01 16:08:13
8 at the end of the month, the state changes very slowly, return to the end of October, two reviewersThe results of the overhaul, and the opinions of many editorial offices, have been changed very carefully.The overhaul gave me 1 month, 20 days to seriously modify and return.It has been 13 days since the overhaul was submitted out, and it is still very embarrassing.Share it with everyone, like to receive good news quickly.This journal is still very fast in general.The impact factor also rises fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 499781143@qq.com

Author: 南_调


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-22 10:43:34
Good journal, first selectVery happy.The editor was very serious, and the comments were detailed and pertinent. After one month, I returned to the opinion overhaul. It took a month to carefully revise the reply and receive it after half a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 南_调

Author: 小浪花


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-12 20:25:13
journal is good!It is a very good journal, the review period is short, and the reviewers are very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小浪花

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-28 09:44:00
is very similar to the friend upstairs. I selectd for an article. After submitting it, I submitted Submitted to Journal. Two days later I received a rejection letter saying that the content did not match.In the manuscript, the recent impact factors of the MCA were highlighted to illustrate the rigor of the pre-review process before the review, but unlike other journals, the rejection letter used a template. The MCA rejection letter seems to be for different article editing.It has been processed, so it is still helpful.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-26 07:22:00
I have selectd for 3 papers.The first one: 1 week after the release with Editor, another week of under Review, then one month to review the comments, overhaul, give time one month, 25 days to finish the return, 3 days after receiving directly, the revised draft editor changedThe title and abstract of the article, about 4 days proof, will be published in the month, the total time is 2 and a half months from submission to seeing the page number, very quickly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-17 10:24:00
I also selectd for this journal, and it’s still a state of Submitted to Journal for ten days. It’s speechless.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-12 07:46:00
Is this journal going to collapse? After submiting for more than ten days, the manuscript number has not been assigned yet, and has not sent back to the editor.I don't know how to retract the manuscript, and I selectd for other journals and I was afraid of a manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-11 14:58:00
9月26投了 Today October 11 is still subject to the journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-11 10:37:00
Submitted on September 22nd, today, October 11th, the status is still Submitted to Journal, even a manuscript number is not assigned, in front of the insect friends said that the speed is fast, I see it toWhen did I drag it?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-06 15:35:00
I selectd in August, and I will give comments on the review in November, and receive it after revision.The questions raised by the two reviewers were very good, especially for the comparative experiments.The editor was very responsible and even rewrote my abstract, which made me very moved.One of the more interesting ones, the reviewers gave me some articles to use as a reference for answering the review comments. They are all articles of their own journals. Oh, it seems that they are self-citing in this way, so it is recommended that the latecomers prepare to select for this.When you journal, you can quote more articles, maybe there will be unexpected surprises!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-26 11:05:00
We recently published a paper in the journal, and our lab has published many articles in this journal. There are also many Chinese articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-15 06:15:00
In early November, submitted in the first half of November, assigned to the editor after technical check, another week, under review, mid-term, mid, minor, revision, mid-month, mid-month, accept is still awesome, luck is good, huh, huh~ feeling articleThere are some novelty, which is in line with the scope of the journal's submission, and the probability is quite large.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-13 18:44:00
8 At the end of the month, Under Review in early September, the results of the first trial on October 14th, gave a major repair, three reviewers, one opinion is minor repair, the other two reviewers eachI have raised nearly 10 questions, but the questions are still very good. The reviewers are still quite level; the experiment is to answer the questions seriously, and the revised draft and reply comments are submitted in early November. Accepting on November 12 is still quite fast.From submission to acceptance for 2 and a half months, the editor is good, and the abstract has been revised very seriously. I feel that it is quite good to recommend high-sensitivity testing. The classmate selectd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Microchimica Acta]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service