Microchimica Acta

The journal is very good, which is equal to its impact factor! The editor basically updates the status every Friday. The first submission will be with editor (it should be an assistant editor of the journal, checking the similarity, etc.). After a week, the status becomes editor invited. We thought the editor was changed, and we were so worried. Later it became with editor (who managed our manuscript). The review cycle is a bit long for 2 months, with two reviewers, and one minor revision and one major revision were required. The review comments for the major revision should be raised by the editor, which were especially careful. One month was given for revision. We responded very carefully and wrote a full 32 pages of response to the comments (which was longer than our article). It was not accepted directly as said by the people upstairs, but was sent for review, then it got accepted in two days after submission! The editor is very responsible and serious. It is worth recommending.

(13) Thank | young

December 26, 2018, submit to the journal; February 24, 2019, major revision needed. (There were three reviewers, the first reviewer required a minor revision and the second one rejected it. The third reviewer was probably the journal’s editor, who gave a lot of comments and required major revision.) Revised submission on April 16, 2019. (It's really too busy to delay for a long time for I have to write a graduation design thesis during the time. Sorry, sorry.) The article was direct accepted on April 27, 2019, without sending for review again. May 3, 2019, proof. Thanks! This is my first article on a SCI journal! I wish the journal will be better and better!

(15) Thank | 123123123

This journal is not too demanding for innovative work, but it is very strict and demanding. My understanding is that your article can be general, but the text, structure, and data must be very standardized. Your material must be treated carefully. There are 3 reviewers. I had 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul, and editorial advice of various kinds. The editor is very serious. The summary and introduction can all indicate a bunch of problems. I took a month to overhaul the article and resubmitted it. They accepted it.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Submit more than 1After the month, I received the news: 3 reviewers gave a lot of comments, the editor gave the rejection, but invited the revision to re-attend.Revised for about a month, seriously replied to the opinions of the three reviewers, and the reply was super detailed.About 10 days after the resubmission, the editor accepted it directly and did not submit it for review.

(38) Thank | 我以为你不再选我了呢

The manuscript of September 10th, 2017, the opinion coming in early November, the revised data will be returned at the beginning of December, and the 2018 New Year's Day will receive the information, a very good New Year gift.The impact factor of Online was 3 o'clock, and now it has risen to 5.7, which is even higher than the other one district article sent. It feels like a rise in the area is just around the corner!

(1) Thank | 18817313575@163.com

Why did you receive it, but the page number is so slow?

(0) Thank | 739253589@qq.com

The fourth part of this year's select. See the comment saying that the speed is fast. I selectd for the second submission. It is still Submitted to Journal but there is Manuscript Number.Can I come back in a month?Before the laboratory selectd inappropriately, it was the day that I refused to come to me. This efficiency is good, I hope it will be good luck...

(5) Thank | ASAP

High, I received the first-instance opinion in about a month. Although I was rejected, I have to say that the reviewer is really serious and refuses to accept it.Personal feelings must be complete, take seriously, and highlight their own advantages.

(4) Thank | yita

ending 2017 11. 20 Instant IF= 3387/679=4.98 If you can still increase by 20% before June 2018,The next IF will be more than 6.

(2) Thank | hahahaha

How many impact factors are there now? How much next year?

(0) Thank | aaa

2017.9.14 even IFMicrochimica Acta 3.95Electroche. commun. 2.9Electrochimca Acta 3.25The 2018 IF is probably going beyond the EA and EC points, and it is a little faster!

(2) Thank | tutga

Journal If you find a reviewer, the review comments are still very fast, usually half a month to a month.I submitted it on May 9th, I went to the editor on the 21st, an under review on June 9th, an under review on the 14th, a major revision on July 1st, a minor review of two reviewers, a major repair, and a journal for one month.Overhaul time.Seriously revised for 20 days, submitted a revised draft on July 20, only to the editor in the 31st, thought that it would be sent out for trial, did not expect the 12th state to become accept.The first SCI, the first time to submitted MCA, did not expect such a smooth ~ gave me a lot of confidence

(3) Thank | Rios

Help God.I selectd for three days, the status shows that I haven't edited yet, are you so slow?I want to page out before September. What should I do?

(0) Thank | 962968333@qq.com

2017.1.19 submitted, 3.17 received review comments, two reviewers, one minor repair, one heavy shot, and finally gave a major repair, one month of modification time; there are manyThe editor's office was changed very carefully, the editor was very responsible, and I rewrote my title and abstract..Compensatory experiment, carefully revised, 3.29 returned to the revised draft, 4.11 received.Very happy, I received it before graduation.

(4) Thank | cc300

8 at the end of the month, the state changes very slowly, return to the end of October, two reviewersThe results of the overhaul, and the opinions of many editorial offices, have been changed very carefully.The overhaul gave me 1 month, 20 days to seriously modify and return.It has been 13 days since the overhaul was submitted out, and it is still very embarrassing.Share it with everyone, like to receive good news quickly.This journal is still very fast in general.The impact factor also rises fast.

(1) Thank | 499781143@qq.com

Good journal, first selectVery happy.The editor was very serious, and the comments were detailed and pertinent. After one month, I returned to the opinion overhaul. It took a month to carefully revise the reply and receive it after half a month.

(4) Thank | 南_调

journal is good!It is a very good journal, the review period is short, and the reviewers are very good!

(1) Thank | 小浪花

is very similar to the friend upstairs. I selectd for an article. After submitting it, I submitted Submitted to Journal. Two days later I received a rejection letter saying that the content did not match.In the manuscript, the recent impact factors of the MCA were highlighted to illustrate the rigor of the pre-review process before the review, but unlike other journals, the rejection letter used a template. The MCA rejection letter seems to be for different article editing.It has been processed, so it is still helpful.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have selectd for 3 papers.The first one: 1 week after the release with Editor, another week of under Review, then one month to review the comments, overhaul, give time one month, 25 days to finish the return, 3 days after receiving directly, the revised draft editor changedThe title and abstract of the article, about 4 days proof, will be published in the month, the total time is 2 and a half months from submission to seeing the page number, very quickly.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I also selectd for this journal, and it’s still a state of Submitted to Journal for ten days. It’s speechless.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Is this journal going to collapse? After submiting for more than ten days, the manuscript number has not been assigned yet, and has not sent back to the editor.I don't know how to retract the manuscript, and I selectd for other journals and I was afraid of a manuscript.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

9月26投了 Today October 11 is still subject to the journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on September 22nd, today, October 11th, the status is still Submitted to Journal, even a manuscript number is not assigned, in front of the insect friends said that the speed is fast, I see it toWhen did I drag it?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I selectd in August, and I will give comments on the review in November, and receive it after revision.The questions raised by the two reviewers were very good, especially for the comparative experiments.The editor was very responsible and even rewrote my abstract, which made me very moved.One of the more interesting ones, the reviewers gave me some articles to use as a reference for answering the review comments. They are all articles of their own journals. Oh, it seems that they are self-citing in this way, so it is recommended that the latecomers prepare to select for this.When you journal, you can quote more articles, maybe there will be unexpected surprises!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

We recently published a paper in the journal, and our lab has published many articles in this journal. There are also many Chinese articles.

(0) Thank | Anonymous