The journal is very efficient. The review comments returned in ten days. I got the notice in four days after submitting the revision, After the final confirmation that the manuscript was ok, it was published directly on the internet. It took less than a month for the whole process. It is a very good journal for those who do research on marine biological active substances to choose.

(1) Thank | denybear

The editing is very good. The minor repairs were directly accepted. The innovation requirements for the thesis are relatively high. Before the article was rejected, the structure was changed. In the past month, there were more experiments and more good work, so the small repair was accepted directly in 4 days. The reviewer's questions were very professional. It is necessary to look at the literature and answer it carefully.

(0) Thank | shine

8.15 Submmission 
9.13 Review with feedback, one no feedback, one with major revisions
9.15 Revised submission
9.18 Acceptance
9.25 Publication

(2) Thank | JimPN

The speed of magazine submission is indeed very fast. The submission was made on December 12, 2022, and the review comments were received on December 18, 2022. After submitting the revised article on December 21, 2022, the acceptance notification was received on December 23, 2022. The layout fee was remitted on December 26, 2022, and the article was published on December 28, 2022. The whole process took a total of 16 days, which is very suitable for people who are in a hurry to submit their graduation work.

(1) Thank | budingyueer

Review Speed: 24.0 
Experience Sharing

(0) Thank | Bella Cotton

Delete unnecessary parts based on the main content of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The selected charts and graphs clearly present the research context, while avoiding redundant information. Supplementary charts can be included in an appendix

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If I have too many pictures/too many tables that exceed the journal's requirements, how should I handle it?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

I have too many results, and the article can't contain them all. What should I do?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

Excellent journal

(0) Thank | Man

At the beginning, during the pandemic when there was nothing to do, I wrote a review and submitted it. It was under review within a day and took three weeks to receive the first review. I was not scared when I saw the feedback in the email. There were four reviewers, and I originally thought it would only be two, but they provided more than ten comments, which wasn't too many and relatively easy to handle. I submitted the revised version within 48 hours, and it was accepted within 30 minutes. It went smoothly like a rocket.

(11) Thank | KINGFAKU

The so-called commissioned work was rejected the day after submission

(0) Thank | Regan John

Hello, may I ask what type of articles this magazine prefers? My article focuses on the effects and molecular mechanisms of marine drugs, without a chemical component. Would it be suitable for submission?

(0) Thank | 螳螂光亮

The overall quality of the article is just average, it's acceptable for some sensationalism but not much on the content side

(0) Thank | 北风佳妮

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

Question and/or feedback from reviewers were super tough. Editors were super professional.

(0) Thank | bifidus

The editing is very good, minor revisions were made and accepted directly. The requirements for innovation in the paper are quite high. A previous submission was rejected due to structural issues, but this latest one, which included more experiments conducted and was done well, was accepted with just minor revisions in 4 days. The reviewers' questions were very professional, so it is essential to carefully read the literature and answer them seriously

(0) Thank | 五轮耀兴

The articles in this journal are of good quality now, and some articles are of higher quality than JNP.Some people who know each other have contributed tragedies. It seems that the quality of the articles is much higher.The academic editor is very responsible.The review speed is very fast, I hope this journal is getting better and better.

(9) Thank | 214022303

The quality of the articles in this magazine is good now, and some articles are even of higher quality than those in JNP. Some people I know have submitted tragic pieces. It seems that the requirements for article quality have increased a lot. The academic editor-in-chief is very diligent and responsible. The reviewing process is very fast, and I hope this magazine will continue to improve

(0) Thank | 气甲醉珊

The editor will be assigned the same day, and the next day will be reviewed.After nine days of submission, the results of the first trial came out, minor repairs.Later modified the languageFrom the first submission of 18.5.21 to the online publication of No. 6.20, the whole time is 30 days.After 8 days, the impact factor rose from 3.503 to 4.379.I feel very lucky!In honor of your first article!

(2) Thank | 小兰花