After three months, the second review began. The first revision before the second review was more troublesome, where various supplementary experiments and explanations were made. It happened to be the epidemic during the second review. I don't know if it was the reason that it took more than half a year before I received the acceptance notice. The whole process took one year and two months.

(1) Thank | aiyawai

The manuscript was submitted in May 2019. There was only one reviewer in the first round of review, who pointed out some grammatical errors, format errors of the references, and also raised some comments to enhance the persuasiveness of the experiment. The manuscript was resubmitted in November 2019. Major revision was required in March 2020. There were 2 reviewers in this time, who raised some very professional questions, and some of the questions were difficult to revise. I honestly admitted the shortcomings in the reply. In August 2020, minor revision was required by the editor. At this time, I revised some grammatical errors and submitted it. The minor revised manuscript will not be sent to the reviewers, and the editor reviewed it himself and accepted it. The whole submission lasted for 18 months. I personally think if you urge, it can speed up the process. I urged in the last round, and the status immediately changed to decision in process.

(0) Thank | eric1

2019.4.29, submission; 2020.3.19, the status was still under review. The change of status date last time was 2020.2.3. I am about to graduate soon. I feel hopeless.

(0) Thank | dandandanxin

I had a recent experience to share(1) Journal editors are good.(2) Reviewer: pretty tough. My article was not a great one, but adequate for the level of this journal. the reviewer rejects the manuscript based on a few sharp comments: a. Grammar problems. But look at the reviewer comments, how many grammatical mistakes are there? b. Another reviewer: The article did not make a breakthrough contribution. I don't want to overstate my finding, but I would like to ask, if I make a breakthrough contribution, would I have submitted to a better journal? The third reviewer, Minor revision. The first two, rejection.

(5) Thank | pernanoid

Are there any formatting requirements? Will Word automatically reject it?

(0) Thank | maple2506

May I ask if the changes made in the revised draft need to be highlighted in red?

(0) Thank | Quan

Not hired yet.

(0) Thank | tjf836

What is your research direction? Have you been hired now? Is it over?

(0) Thank | maple2506

Have you been hired yet, bro?

(0) Thank | maple2506

Excuse me, does this journal accept papers on low-light image enhancement?

(0) Thank | 丑猫

Hello everyone, when I was submitting to this journal, I saw on the journal's official website that the abstract should be less than 250 words. However, when I entered the abstract in the final step of the submission system, it required the abstract to be less than 150 words. Which requirement should I follow? Can the abstract filled in the system be different from the one submitted in the pdf? I would appreciate it if anyone could provide an answer. Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | good_good

Apr 23, 2025 Minor revise, resubmit, with editor
May 20, 2025 Accept

(0) Thank | accept+1000

Submission on October 10, 2024
First round of review on October 22, 2024
Major revision on December 31, 2024
Submission of revision on January 27, 2025
Second round of review on March 11, 2025
Accepted on May 8, 2025

(0) Thank | memory4963

I don't want anyone to submit to this *** journal, the editor is completely ***. Malicious rejection, with editor for three months, first review completed and revised uploaded by 5.4, all reviewers' comments were good, on 5.8 directly with editor became DIP and then rejected without going through reviewers' evaluation. The chief editor directly rejected the submission by saying that the journal did not have the energy to review so many articles and the innovation points were not enough. It has been a back and forth for six months, the paper was submitted in late November last year, this yuan editor is really something. The first review was satisfactory, but the paper was rejected after revisions. You are really something, lj journal, slow and delaying.

(1) Thank | 梦依恋

Why is there another major revise after the minor revise?

(0) Thank | accept+1000

Went through four rounds of revisions: two major revisions, one minor revision, and another major revision. Was feeling frustrated with the process, but thankfully finally received acceptance in the end.

(0) Thank | 科研小白符

Aren't you already very fast?

(0) Thank | Quan

The speed at which the editor handles manuscripts is really slow.

(0) Thank | accept+1000

Just want to ask what is the direction of the OP?

(0) Thank | 7个7

2024-04-01 小修正

(0) Thank | tjf836

24 days.

(0) Thank | tjf836

Bro, how long have you been waiting for the decision status?

(0) Thank | ke

2025.3.31 Required Reviews Completed

(0) Thank | Quan

Reviews Completed by March 31, 2025.

(0) Thank | Quan

2025-3-22 under review

(0) Thank | Quan