My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 105994 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ NANOSCI NANOTECHNO
ISSN1533-4880
h-index93
CiteScoreN.A.
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.30%
Official Websitehttp://www.aspbs.com/jnn/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.aspbs.com/jnn/
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS, 25650 NORTH LEWIS WAY, STEVENSON RANCH, USA, CA, 91381-1439
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume1163
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1533-4880%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.2 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 87%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 暮生


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-15 22:27:32
Submission two weeks minor repairSubmit after modification, edit reply after a week to polishI have modified it many times, and I have also changed it to a professional English teacher. The editor still disagreed. I didn’t want to find a special organization to polish it. I also said that I couldn’t find a suitable one to recommend to us. Finally, I felt that the price is too low and I have missed it.When the time of the national award was won, there was no touch up and it was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 暮生

Author: Liu_ying@163.com


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-16 19:54:15
Modify the seven-time format, personal feeling, such a low-scoring journal, more than 1 point, still so proud,The self-introduction rate is quite high, and there are many articles in the year. The page fee is not low. I hope that it will not be removed by SCI.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Liu_ying@163.com

Author: 7654321


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-12 10:30:34
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) The editorial and management team has noted that there are problems with the cited models in the following journals, published by the American Science Press:Nanoscience and Nanotechnology LettersJournal of Biobased Materials and BioenergyJournal of Biomedical NanotechnologyJournal of Nanoscience and NanotechnologyBone ResearchManipulating the citation index is extremely bad behavior.As the sole provider of documentation statistics, Clarivate Analytics will continue to monitor, submitigate, and collate our data and identify anomalies that cause ranking distortions.We have submitigated the above journals and their affiliated publications.At the end of the submitigation, we will take appropriate measures, including moving the offending journals out of JCR and even removing Web of Science.So things will affect the citation index of many journals, Clarivate Analytics is hereby announced to remind users to pay attention
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 7654321

Author: 一叶子


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-07 20:33:12
selectd in November last year, reminded me to review the manuscript many times. In April this year, I wanted to retract the manuscript. The editor said to the manuscript. After the minor repair, I rushed three times and finally replied, even let the organization polish up.After accepting the English correction certificate, I accepted it. I didn’t say anything to spend money on it. It was really drunk.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 一叶子

Author: ww


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-04 17:40:04
Slow and snail-like journals, and the mailbox is submitted, very not broken
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ww

Author: 1243952276@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-31 10:28:03
First submission date: 2016.1.4First urging 2016.2.24Received a modified email 2016.3.18After the modification, re-submitment 2016.4.18Received date 2016.6.3
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 1243952276@qq.com

Author: jife


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-30 10:07:49
Review to accept faster, 2 months, but after PROOF submission to ONLINE at least 6 months, I have been 8 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jife

Author: 飞奔


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-10-08 09:33:14
used to be very slow, and it seems that the speed has increased recently, and it is accepted in 2 months.The editor is very nice, touched ING,In the old nano journals, the system level should be improved.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 飞奔

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-25 05:45:00
I am doing Wiener optics, doing metal microstructure processing, so I selectd for one.I selectd in September last year, and after two days I wrote back to ask for some formatting errors. It can be seen that the editing efficiency is still quite high.However, it has been news since then, and this journal has no online system and can't see the status.Four months later, in February of this year, I couldn’t help but send a letter asking about the review status of the article. I didn’t expect the editor to reply directly and said that it had been accepted.After about two weeks, I sent a proof of proof, and then I waited until I was in June.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-24 13:11:00
read everyone's comments, I also say two sentences.Two JNN articles have been accepted and have been revised in the middle.The first article from submission to receipt is exactly 50 days, the second 40 days, the speed is mainly to see the reviewer, the delivery of China is selectd for the academician Bai Chunli, but he generally does not judge, are to the assistant prof.ZhuAfter each delivery, it is generally the same as the day to reply to the mail to receive the submission.However, the time between the receipt of the paper and the manuscript is long and short. I will give proof about 10 days, and it will take nearly two months to proof.Then from the proof of the manuscript to the online publication is generally slow, in my experience, it takes about 3 months.However, the journal's recent impact factor has dropped dramatically. Of course, it is also easier to be accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-23 10:20:00
2February 24 submission, March 28 reminder, and soon reply raised two small questions, the middleThere has been no news, received on October 21st.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-05 09:03:00
I also submitted the manuscript for more than a month, and I didn’t even have an automatic reply. I was prepared to try the manuscript. I saw that everyone had waited for three months and didn’t reply, so I was ready to wait, now even the domesticThe journal has received the automatic reply function of the manuscript. Is this international journal still so backward?I don’t know if I will receive the manuscript after submitting the manuscript.石沈大海
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-29 15:56:00
The real junk submission system also did not directly send e-mails in the past, even the automatic reply did not have N days, no news
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-02 12:39:00
May 21 this year, the mailbox submitted,Now more than three months, I sent two emails in the middle to ask about the manuscript. I didn't reply. Because there was no news of the mud cows entering the sea, I changed the submitment after a while without any news.I can't find the online status. I don't recommend posting.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-22 08:50:00
The latest IF 1.149...Prospects worry
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 15:31:00
The first period is thick like an encyclopedia.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-21 18:21:00
The JNN journal was selectd in the end of last year, and the review comments came out on January 3 this year. The review comments were returned on February 6 and accepted on February 18.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-01 08:31:00
11No. 9 submission, no news after that, January 30th reminder, 20 minutes after direct notice of employment!Editing efficiency is super fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-31 10:31:00
Accepts the speed very quickly, it is better, it is accepted after one month's review, but the publication is too slow, it takes about half a year.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-06 16:32:00
Received a JNN acceptance notice today, which is actually not too slow, but many of the reviewers have been delayed!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-06 10:23:00
The first trial was about 2 months, two reviewers, overhauled.It took about 1 month to modify the paper. After the revised draft was uploaded, it was requested to upload “copyright transfer Agreement” during the week. After the submission, the fourth day was notified. The initial review was slower, but the overall speed was faster! The editor was very nice, like one.The impact factors in the past four years are as follows: 2010 2009 2008 2007 1.350 1.434 1.929 1.986 submission experience: Recei
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-16 13:09:00
There are too many reviewers, the results are really unrelenting or the restData, and then piece together to form an article and then the conference article was indexed by JNN
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-16 10:44:00
IF The journal of nanomaterials dropped year by year. It was less than 1.4 in 2011. After the article is receivedSee the network one year later. Very slow. Our group has filled 6 articles in this journal. There are 3 articles in one issue, "牛", ⊙_⊙b Khan. There is no format requirement, direct e-mail toCover letter is submitted in the form of a letter, and more than 3 suggested reviewers are required. The journal homepage has optional editors, except for the well-known scholar Bai Chunli, who is a Chinese and the other is a foreigner. One of the daysI am very quick to review, it is easy to be rejected. Bai Chunli's review is relatively fast. About 2 months. After the overhaul, seriously answer the reviewer's question. Explain clearly. See the points within 2 weeks.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-14 18:27:00
editing work efficiency is very high, my manuscript was rejected the next day and said that it does not meet the theme of the journal, it is recommended to select for other journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-09 20:54:00
7 The article posted at the end of the month, received the acceptance yesterdayNotice, I hope I can rush to publish it years ago.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service