My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 61720 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ MAGN MAGN MATER
ISSN0304-8853
h-index153
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.200.6581.232
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q154 / 234
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q182 / 403

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)15.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505704/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/magma
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume1429
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0304-8853%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.8 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 10.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 28%
Data from Elsevier: 54%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3.6 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 15:15:00
The review speed is generally slow; don’t submit to this journal if you don’t have patience. J3M reviewers are experts. I was told that my experimental methods must be in line with international standards. They also pointed out grammatical errors. I submitted a revision and have now received further comments.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 老法师


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-17 09:49:26
The submission has undergone a major overhaul after three minor repairs, and in general it is more strict.The editor is very motivated, and each time he has just returned to the ten minutes, he will submit a review.This year, I rose to the second district, and then continued to make
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 老法师

Author: bao


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-02 10:34:20
The review period is one month. The first issue of the journal's journals took 71 days. The three shots were rejected, and the journal was transferred to the journal. 8.20 submissions, 10.31accept, intermediate minor repairs, twoReviewers, the questions are not very sharp, they are all textual symbols, because the direction of doing is more consistent, and I have done a lot of papers published in the journal, I feel that the articles published in the journal have a good influence, thanks to the journal editors.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | bao

Author: 大大


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-31 21:38:14
2017年11Monthly submitment, 18 years of April overhaul, received at the end of May, three reviewers, very professional
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 大大

Author: 1914140059@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-19 10:59:07
2017.11.27Submission, the editor is Renat Sabrianov.2018.1.15 comments for review. Two months review time, 2018.3.6 return, 2018.3.18 receivingI only have one reviewer, so I have fewer opinions on review, and I have given five review opinions. The comments are also very professional and pertinent. I don’t have any embarrassment. I personally feel that this submission experience is good, I am very happy with my first article.The paper submitted successfully
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1914140059@qq.com

Author: 丫丫


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-09 22:18:06
was rejected by the second district journal three times, and selectd 3M;With editor about 15 days,The reviewer is very strong and ends the review in 10 days;The editor made the changes, I lost 10 days, EVISE did not give me an email;I went up and saw the change.After the revision, the review was reviewed for 10 days.Receive directly.Thanks to the professional reviewers, the questions are very professional and fast!2.6, I hope to rise again next year!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 丫丫

Author: gxuwuwenwei@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-07 17:11:11
I submitted a paper to the journal in August 2016, and I did not give any revision until September 2017, but when I submitted the revised draft, “Choose Article Type” was displayed."None defined", I did not respond when I clicked on the article type, so I could not complete the submission of the revised manuscript. I sent the e-mail twice to ask the editor, but I still couldn't receive the reply, which is hard to understand.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | gxuwuwenwei@126.com

Author: wanghj29@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-20 14:43:47
07.02 submitStatus keeps reviewer invited to 08.26, reminder once, change under review09.27 Review draft in January, minor repairs, basically all changes, delayed for half a month, the reply is completed,10.20 acceptedThe first article is really hard.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wanghj29@163.com

Author: qshine


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-18 18:34:16
The recent review speed is OK, the new idea of ​​the article is very important, you can emphasize the new ideas in Cover letter
 My article has just been received, and the first-instance revision opinion given in a month or so will be received about one week after the revision.A little different from most people, my article found two reviewers and gave advice. The first reviewer is more inclined to experiment, and the second reviewer is more inclined to simulate.Received 12 December 2016, Revised 30 January 2017, Accepted 9 February 2017Welcome everyone to check:Spin-torque oscillation in large size nano-magnet with perpendicular magnetic fieldsHttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.02.011
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | qshine

Author: wu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-05 20:18:41
simply does not invite reviewers. People feel that the journal lacks authority.I can't find a reviewer in July. I have been in the middle of February. I found a reviewer in the middle. Minor repair, but no echo.In the end, I lost it for seven months. I refused to waste my time!2016.7.19 Submit2016.12.10 Major Revision2016.12.12 Submit revised manuscript2017.2.5 Reject
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wu

Author: zym_dlut@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-02 10:14:55
after submissionThe revised comments will be given one month, and will be submitted to the review again after revision. One month later, one reviewer will be accepted.I always feel that the focus is on the article's new ideas. The reviewers' suggestions are all relative to the content, and there is no requirement for English.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zym_dlut@163.com

Author: 2462281545@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-03 10:39:25
I submitted the manuscript around August 20th. I will give a review opinion after about one month. I met an expert in this field. The question was very sharp and I gave a major repair. I will review it on October 14.Draft, the direct result is unknown,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 2462281545@qq.com

Author: 21465156


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-31 15:01:44
with editor Half a month, no movement....无语
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 21465156

Author: luqhis@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-19 00:40:54
may be lucky, or it was rejected by the 2nd district journal several times and finally RP broke out. The submission was directly accepted for one month, and no word was changed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | luqhis@163.com

Author: K-L


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-01-13 00:05:52
Sep.16, 2014, submittedOct.30, 2014, submit for review, enter reviewDec.18, 2014 reminder onceJan.11, 2015 The journal manager replied that the editor has been trusted to review the reviewerJan.11, 2015 received the status message from Samuel D. Bader, editor-in-chief, saying that the review is over and the assessment is entered.Life and death are not satisfied, waiting patiently (not to be continued)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | K-L

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-10 06:14:00
submitted a long time ago, tragedy.As a reviewer several times, the review time is one month, and the interviews are all articles of domestic universities.To be honest, the few English articles I reviewed were a bad one. The logic is called a bad one. Hey, can't you check it carefully before submitting a manuscript?Usually give a major repair, no more minor repairs, it is recommended to receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-16 19:44:00
Is there a reviewer that is fast?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-13 07:10:00
四月 Directly hiring without words
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-12 09:05:00
is super slow, one month has not been submitted for review, 啥 efficiency, speechless.......
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-11 08:08:00
The first time I selectd for this journal is very temperamental reviewer is very responsible for the speed of super fast three days of evaluation, the evaluation is very high, so that the editor has not seen such a slow editor.And the staff first shot for more than half a month without editing and processing the number of emails before the editor, followed by a long with editor one month after the trial for three days, then a long wait for the editor to decide that the minor repair the next day isA long wait.... After more than a month, the editor who is not responsible for the direct acceptance does not send the reviewer and will not consider such irresponsible journals in the future!At the beginning, I didn't select for this good journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-26 22:07:00
has passed one article and refused two or three articles. This time it has been submitted for more than two months. The reviewer suddenly changed it today. It is estimated that this time is too much....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-28 11:32:00
There is only one reviewer, and the editing B.D. is slower, but the reviewer is extremely efficient, from submission to receiving for three and a half months.The work has novelty, and the article is still relatively good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-17 16:50:00
10 No. 8 submission, the editor selected is Samuel D. Bader, editor, October 11th under review, and then has not been moving, more than three months, very test people's patience.Status Date becomes January 20th, and the status is still under review. February 4, Required Reviews Completed, continue to wait.On February 8th, an overhaul was required. There was only one reviewer's opinion, and it felt a little painless.I have to look at the literature for the New Year, and submit the revise on February 19th and continue to wait.February 19 with editor.March 1
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-25 16:38:00
I have selectd 7 articles in this journal, and 4 of them.I just accepted an article recently, and the whole process is 2 and a half months. Other articles are also at this speed. It is not clear why many bugs say that the speed is very slow. This speed should still be acceptable.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-06 21:46:00
reviewed the draft for two months, gave a minor repair, passed it half a month, accepted after half a month.Feel the speed is moderate.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service